LTTE's Military Victories & International Response: 1997 - 2000 |
17 December 1999 |
Paranthan falls to LTTE
"Paranthan army camp,
situated strategically on the southern sector of Elephant Pass base
complex, has fallen to the LTTE fighters today after intense
fighting that lasted more than 24 hours. Paranthan junction and its
surrounding areas are now under the control of the LTTE fighters..."
|
25 January 2000 |
What's the Solution -
Nadesan Satyendra
"...In the end, a solution
to the Tamil Eelam - Sri Lanka conflict will have to be found by
looking behind the stated positions of the parties to the conflict
and trying to clarify and understand the interests that each
party seeks to protect. There is a need to genuinely understand
these interests. There may be a need to refine, and build on, the
approaches spelt out in
Sri Lanka-Tamil Eelam:
Getting to Yes..."
|
28 March 2000 |
Institute of Commonwealth Studies -
Workshop on Peace Process
"In comparison to consecutive Sri
Lankan governments, the LTTE have consistently had a better grasp of
political and military realities.. the government's analysis is frequently
based on hearsay, telling powerful people what they want to hear..."
|
22 April 2000 |
Elephant Pass Falls to LTTE
"Yakachchi
and Elephant Pass bases forming the giant military complex of the Sri
Lankan army on the gateway to Jaffna fell to the combat formations of the
Liberation Tigers this afternoon following 48 hours of fierce and bloody
fighting. Over one thousand Sri Lankan troops were killed and the rest fled
in total disarray..."
|
11 May 2000 |
LTTE scores spectacular military gains
"..The combat units of the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) achieved spectacular
military gains in the battle of Jaffna today when they advanced
close to the city centre in the Jaffna municipal area and overran
two major military bases in the Chavakachcheri sector..."
|
21 May 2000 |
India ready to
take any step that is necessary in Sri Lanka says Indian Prime Minister
|
22 May 2000 |
Eelam will not harm India
says LTTE Spokesman in London |
24 May 2000 |
India has offered to play the role of broker says Minister Kadirgamar |
31 May 2000 |
India will not broker
ceasefire says Indian Statesman |
31 May 2000 |
India happy to let Norway deal
with LTTE confirms Indian Express |
1 June 2000 |
US based Centre for Strategic & International Studies on LTTE's
'Dramatic Advance to Gates of Jaffna'
"The dramatic advance of
the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) into the Jaffna
peninsula, the heart of the Tamil area, is a shattering blow for Sri
Lanka's President Chandrika Kumaratunga and raises concerns of
regional instability for India. The immediate danger is massive
bloodshed, with upwards of 25,000 Sri Lankan troops still in Jaffna
city ....In the longer term, the prospects for Sri Lanka's fragile
peace efforts
have been badly undercut. Reviving them will require a much more
radical approach to power sharing than the government has been
willing to consider in the past. This will be very hard to sell to
both the Sinhalese political mainstream and the LTTE, but it will
only get harder with time.... A loose confederal structure, with
some kind of explicit recognition of the Tamils as a collective
group within it and with stronger guarantees of their inclusion in
power at the national level, might be more successful. Two draft
Canadian constitutions proposed that certain legislative changes
would require a "double majority" of both English and
French-speaking parliamentarians; an analogous provision might be
useful. Obviously, this type of radical departure would be intensely
controversial in the Sri Lankan political mainstream. But half
measures will only prolong the country's agony..."
|
2 June 2000 |
US think tank moots
confederal Sri Lanka says Deccan Herald |
3 June 2000 |
US Confederation
move divides Sri Lanka claims Hindustan Times |
15 June 2000 |
World Bank Report - Sri Lanka:
Recapturing Missed Opportunities
"The conflict has reduced Sri Lanka�s economic
growth and the most obvious direct cost is in terms of defence
expenditures, which increased from 1.3% of GDP in 1980 to 4-6% over
recent years. Some of the other direct costs are government
expenditures on relief, damaged infrastructure and military
expenditure by the LTTE. ...Sri
Lanka�s future economic and social development will depend not
merely on maintaining sound macroeconomic management, but more
importantly on the country�s ability to resolve the continuing
conflict..."
|
31 July 2000 |
Karunanithi suggests Czechoslovakian Model to end conflict - Victor
Rajakulendran |
1 September 2000 |
US
Congressman Brad Sherman to US Secretary of State
"The
United States has an opportunity make Sri Lanka a model and help it
to evolve, by negotiating,
two
autonomous democratic political structures within a system acceptable to
both parties, where ethnic communities can coexist peacefully on the
Island. The US should be firm in its message to the government and the
opposition, that if negotiations are not forthcoming immediately, they
should be prepared to conduct a referendum of the Tamil people in Sri
Lanka.This can be done with the assistance of the United Nations similar
to the
referendum in East Timor. Thus, in the absence of a negotiated
settlement, the Tamil people could determine whether they want a
confederation or
a separate state as endorsed by the Tamil people in the last
democratic elections held in 1977 in the north and east of Sri Lanka..."
|
October 2000 |
Sri Lanka�s Long War - Miriam Young
"..Unless consistent
pressure is brought to bear on both the LTTE and the government,
they are unlikely to make serious efforts to change. Although the
parties cannot be forced to the negotiating table, points of
leverage need to be considered.
One
point of leverage is aid, an option donor countries have been
unwilling to use in the past but which bears another look, given
that the Sri Lankan government is now channeling a much higher
proportion of its resources into the war. At the same time, it would
be helpful for the U.S. to find a way to open a channel of
communication with the LTTE, as it has done with other guerrilla
groups in the past. The willingness of many countries to concur
with the Sri Lankan government�s demonization of the LTTE will not
lead to an environment conducive to negotiations, and Washington
should avoid such a one-sided approach..."
|
1 November 2000 |
LTTE leader meets
Norwegian Peace Envoy |
November 2000 |
Raymond Johansen,
Norwegian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, to Mr.V.Pirabhakaran,
Leader of LTTE
with proposal for Memorandum of Understanding |
23 November 2000 |
The British Devolution
Experience - Peter Hain, UK Minister of State, Foreign Affairs
"This is a war neither side
can win militarily. It is a conflict that cannot be resolved without
elected leaders being prepared to sit down with people who may well be
responsible for barbarous assassinations, but
who do have a legitimate political programme which needs to be engaged,
not shunned. It took far too long for us to learn that lesson in
Britain, and far too many lives were lost as a consequence. Equally, the
LTTE, like the IRA, need to acknowledge that, whilst a Tamil Kingdom
constitutionally split from the rest of the island will not receive
recognition by Europe, the USA or indeed India, the principle of self
determination and control over most if not all the key policies
affecting daily life would be supported by the international community.
There is no future for a Sri Lanka paralysed by dogma, intransigence and
cruelty. Compromises, difficult decisions and tough choices will be
needed, some painful..."
|