| 
 CONTENTS OF   
    THIS SECTION  
    19/09/09  | 
 India & the 
Struggle for Tamil Eelam  
  
On LTTE's Air Capability 
  B.Raman,
	South Asia Analysis Group (SAAG) 
	
	 
	
	LTTE Air Strike on Katunayake - An Assessment, 27 March 2007 
	 
	 
	
	Another Pre-Emptive LTTE Air Strike, 24 April 2007 
	  
	Countering LTTE's 
	Air Capability, 26 April 2007 
	
	  
	
	Countering LTTE's Air Capability - An Interesting Feed Back, 28 April 
	2007 
	[see also
	
	
	Katunayake Military Airbase Bombed by LTTE Air Wing, 25 March 2007 ;
	
	Liberation Tigers bomb Sri Lankan military�s main base complex in Jaffna  
	and
	
	Liberation Tigers bomb Fuel Refinery in Kolonnawa near Colombo, 28 April 
	2007]  
 
 
  
LTTE Air Strike on Katunayake - An Assessment, 
 
B.Raman,
South Asia Analysis Group (SAAG)
	27 March 2007 
	
	
	"The TAF's [Tamileelam Air Force's] air strike was 
	well-planned and equally well-executed. It was a night operation taking 
	advantage of the weak capability of the SLAF for night operations. It was a 
	precision attack, which carefully avoided causing any casualty or damage in 
	the international airport, which could have roused international ire. There 
	were no civilian casualties----targeted or collateral. As a result, it would 
	not be possible to characterise the attack as an act of terrorism. It was 
	pure and simple a conventional air strike... 
The LTTE should not be allowed to retain its TAF. The matter 
should be taken up in the UN Security Council under Resolution 1373 and an 
ultimatum issued to the LTTE to surrender its planes to observers appointed by 
the UNSC. If it fails do so, the bank accounts of all members of the Sri Lankan 
Tamil diaspora suspected or known to be funding the LTTE should be frozen as a 
first step to make it see reason. If it continues to be defiant, other measures 
have to be considered like knocking them out. These measures have to be combined 
with pressure on the Rajapakse Government to initiate a political process 
towards a federal solution. Unilateral action only against the LTTE without 
simultaneous action against the Rajapakse Government or vice versa will prove 
counter-productive."  
 
The Sri Lankan Government has imposed a total black-out on the 
losses suffered by it from the conventional air strike launched by the Tamil 
Eelam Air Force (TAF) of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) on the air 
base of the Sri Lankan Air Force (SLAF) at Katunayake outside Colombo on March 
26,2007. The air base is located adjoining the international airport. The 
black-out is meant to hamper any damage assessment by the media and other 
analysts -from Sri Lanka as well as outside. One has to therefore, depend on 
source reports. 
 
2. The only information which the Government has given out is that two 
helicopters were damaged. It has tried to create an impression as if there was 
no damage to its fighter aircraft. Source reports, on the other hand, indicate 
that the TAF air strike has severely damaged, if not destroyed, at least a half 
of the aircraft holdings of the SLAF. The truth will be known only if and when 
the SLAF resumes its operations in the Tamil areas. If the Government's 
contention that there was no damage to its fighter aircraft is correct, then 
there would be no impact on its air operations in the Tamil areas. If the source 
reports' contention is correct, one would see a marked decrease in the SLAF's 
air operations in the days to come. 
 
3. The TAF's air strike was well-planned and equally well-executed. It was a 
night operation taking advantage of the weak capability of the SLAF for night 
operations. It was a precision attack, which carefully avoided causing any 
casualty or damage in the international airport, which could have roused 
international ire. There were no civilian casualties----targeted or collateral. 
As a result, it would not be possible to characterise the attack as an act of 
terrorism. It was pure and simple a conventional air strike. The bombs targeted 
the hangar or hangars at the base inside which the aircraft of the SLAF are 
normally parked at night. Three SLAF personnel were killed and about 20 injured. 
It is not yet known whether they were the maintenance people or whether any of 
them were pilots. Maintenance casualties can be easily replaced, but not pilot 
casualties. 
 
4.Some worrisome questions arise. Even professional pilots of a State Air Force 
need regular flying practice. You can't just assemble or take out an aircraft 
from a hide-out and fly out on a bombing mission. Where were the TAF pilots 
doing their flying practice? How come the Air Force intelligence set-ups of Sri 
Lanka as well as India missed detecting these training flights of the TAF? One 
needs fuel for the aircraft. From the way the LTTE has been warning of more air 
attacks, it seems to have an adequate reserve of fuel. Where from it got the 
fuel? Hopefully, not from India. Since April last year, when the Government of 
President Mahinda Rajapakse started using the SLAF, the latter has been claiming 
that it had repeatedly bombed the air strip of the TAF. When an air strip is 
bombed, it takes time to repair it. How did the LTTE manage to repair it without 
any problem? Or, does it have another air strip, which has not come to the 
notice of the Sri Lankan intelligence? 
 
5. The air strike was a daring operation. The TAF aircraft were air-borne for a 
little over two hours. There was every danger of the aircraft being intercepted 
and destroyed by the SLAF. The fact that the LTTE leadership decided to face 
this risk speaks of a certain desperation behind the decision to launch the air 
strike. One could detect a similar desperation in its efforts to smuggle 
material required for improvised explosive devices (IEDS) from Tamil Nadu. Since 
November,2006, a number of consignments of ball bearings, aluminium and similar 
material intended for smuggling to the LTTE-controlled areas have been 
intercepted by the Tamil Nadu Police and the Coast Guard. "The Hindu" of March 
24,2007, has reported that one of the arrested persons admitted during the 
interrogation that one consignment had managed to reach Sri Lanka. (see item 
titled " Two Held in Iron Balls Seizure Case" on Page 8). Two conclusions 
emerge: First, the LTTE is so desperate for replenishments from Tamil Nadu that 
it is prepared to face the risk of the arrest of some of its collaborators in 
Tamil Nadu. Second, if one consignment managed to avoid detection and 
interception and reach the LTTE, there is a strong possibility of more 
consignments having reached the LTTE. This reveals gaps in our counter-LTTE 
security measures. 
 
6.This desperation has arisen from the LTTE's fears that the Sri Lankan Armed 
Forces were planning to launch an offensive in the Northern Province after 
having ejected the LTTE from nearly 85 per cent of the total territory in the 
Eastern Province. If the SL Armed Forces score similar successes in the Northern 
Province, that could deal a severe blow to the LTTE's political objectives. LTTE 
spokesmen have been repeatedly hinting that any offensive in the North would 
lead to a blood-bath in areas outside the Eastern and Northern Provinces.The Sri 
Lankan Armed Forces and their Foreign Office were treating these warnings 
casually as the dying gasp of the LTTE. Through its daring air strike, the LTTE 
has conveyed a credible message that it may be down, but not out. It still has a 
lot of daring, fight and innovative ability left in it. 
 
7.The Sri Lankan Armed Forces would be stupid to over-estimate the significance 
of their successes in the Eastern Province and under-estimate the LTTE's 
capabilities in the Northern Province. The successes in the Eastern Province 
were largely due to the role played by Karuna and his men, and the ruthless use 
of the SLAF and the heavy artillery of Pakistani origin. Karuna is a former 
commander of the LTTE from the Batticaloa District of the Eastern Province, who 
deserted from the LTTE in March 2004 due to differences with Prabakaran.  
  
The LTTE did not consider it necessary to use the TAF to prevent 
the set-backs in the Eastern Province. It is facing a serious shortage of 
anti-aircraft weapons and ammunition, but still has some, which have been kept 
in the reserve for use in the North and to prevent a decapitation strike against 
Prabakaran. The Sri Lankan Army will have to operate in the North without the 
support of Karuna and his men, who are detested there as Sinhalese quislings. 
Moreover, the LTTE's soldiers will be fighting in their own area with which they 
are familiar. Any operations in the North will see the LTTE fighting 
ferociously----possibly making full use of its air and anti-aircraft capability. 
It will hit out against the Sinhalese in the rest of Sri Lanka. It is not doing 
so presently due to fears of a backlash against the Tamils living in the 
Sinhalese majority areas, but a desperate LTTE will not be inhibited by such 
considerations. 
 
8. The demonstrated air attack capability of the LTTE poses immediate, short, 
medium and long-term threats to Sri Lanka and medium and long-term threats to 
India. The first immediate threat is to the security of President Rajapakse and 
other VIPs. The ability to use an aircraft---either conventionally or through a 
suicide mission--- will enable the LTTE to circumvent access control measures. 
Without effective access control, there is no effective VIP security. The second 
immediate threat is psychological---the negative impact on foreign tourists and 
investors. This impact will be enhanced if the TAF carries out attacks on 
economic targets. 
 
9. The third immediate impact is also psychological on the minds of the Sri 
Lankan Tamils. Prabakaran is stated to be a voracious reader. He reads 
everything that is available on guerilla warfare, covert actions etc. A 
favourite quote of his from one of these books is:" Those, who dare, win". It is 
said that this quote is exhibited in all training centres of the LTTE. The TAF 
dared on the morning of March 26 against tremendous odds. It succeeded. There 
was elation among the Sri Lankan Tamils all over the world. Many champagne 
bottles were broken by members of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. An added reason 
for this elation is stated to be the fact that all the TAF pilots are from the 
diaspora. One could see a fresh flow of volunteers to join the LTTE from Sri 
Lanka itself as well as from the diaspora. And a fresh flow of funds. 
 
10. To neutralise these psychological impacts, the the SLAF has to demonstrate 
quickly that its capability and morale have not been affected. Can it do so? It 
is very important. 
 
11.The short, medium and long-term threats to Sri Lanka will arise if as a 
result of this demonstrated air capability of the TAF, the SLAF loses its 
present air superiority. If that happens, the SL Armed Forces and the LTTE will 
be more evenly matched on the ground than they are today. That means continuing 
bloodshed and the danger of Tamil Eelam becoming a reality one day.  
The statements of the close advisers of Rajapakse before the air 
raid including those of his Foreign Minister show considerable naivete. They 
seem to think the LTTE can be defeated militarily. The only instances in recent 
history where terrorist organisations have collapsed without achieving any of 
their stated objectives are those of the Khalistanis and of the Western 
ideological groups such as the German Red Army Faction. They collapsed or 
withered away because they had no support from the people for whose cause they 
claimed to be fighting.  
The LTTE has considerable support from the Sri Lankan 
Tamils---in Sri Lanka as well as abroad. Unless they are weaned away from the 
LTTE through appropriate political measures, a military victory is doubtful. 
Repeated bombing raids by the SLAF on Sri Lankan Tamils in order to intimidate 
them are not the way of winning over the Tamils.  
Barring the US, which has been heavily using air strikes against 
the Neo Taliban in Afghanistan and the terrorists and resistance-fighters in 
Iraq, without any significant success, and Israel, which did so in the Lebanon 
in July last year, no other country in the world uses air strikes for 
counter-insurgency operations in such a ruthless manner as the Rajapakse 
Government has been doing. At the least the US and Israel have been bombing 
foreign people in foreign territory, but the Rajapakse Government has been 
bombing from air its own people in its own territory. 
 
12. There is no immediate security threat to India. The medium and long-term 
threats will arise from the likelihood of copy-cat terrorism and the LTTE one 
day using it against an Indian target. India has any number of terrorist and 
insurgent organisations active in different parts of the country. Some of them 
might be tempted to emulate the LTTE. Successful development and use of an 
independent air strike capability by a terrorist organisation is largely 
conditional on its having territorial control over the rural areas. Purely urban 
terrorist organisations would find it difficult to develop an independent air 
capability. In India, the Naxalites (Maoists) have effective control over large 
parts of rural areas. One has to be careful about them. 
 
13. India is no stranger to air terrorism. The plane hijackings by the Jammu and 
Kashmir Liberation Front, the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen and the Khalistanis, the 
blowing-up of the Kanishka aircraft of Air India by the Babbar Khalsa of Canada 
and the clandestine air drop of weapons by a plane manned by a mercenary crew in 
Purulia were instances of air terrorism. In the early 1990s, a member of the 
Babbar Khalsa trained by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence had stated 
during his interrogation that the ISI had asked him to join the Mumbai Flyting 
Club, take a trainer aircraft up and crash it on the Bombay High Oil platform. 
Such instances of air terrorism can be prevented by effective physical security 
on the ground. 
 
14. But when an insurgent or a terrorist organisation acquires an independent 
air strike capability, the task of countering it becomes much more difficult. 
Preventive intelligence is an effective way, but it totally failed in the case 
of the LTTE. It was able to hoodwink the intelligence agencies of many 
countries---including those of India, Sri Lanka and the European countries--- 
get its pilots recruited from the diaspora and trained in foreign training 
institutions ---like Al Qaeda did-- and smuggle the aircraft in dismantled forms 
to the areas controlled by it. 
 
15. The LTTE should not be allowed to retain its TAF. The matter should be taken 
up in the UN Security Council under Resolution 1373 and an ultimatum issued to 
the LTTE to surrender its planes to observers appointed by the UNSC. If it fails 
do so, the bank accounts of all members of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora 
suspected or known to be funding the LTTE should be frozen as a first step to 
make it see reason. If it continues to be defiant, other measures have to be 
considered like knocking them out. These measures have to be combined with 
pressure on the Rajapakse Government to initiate a political process towards a 
federal solution. Unilateral action only against the LTTE without simultaneous 
action against the Rajapakse Government or vice versa will prove 
counter-productive. 
   
 | 
| 
	 
	
	Comment by 
	tamilnation.org  
	- Mr.Raman is right to point out  in 
	
	LTTE Air Strike on Katunayake - An Assessment 
	that "unilateral action only against the LTTE without simultaneous action 
	against the Rajapakse Government will prove counter-productive."  It 
	may be that Mr.Raman is only too aware of something which
	
	 Professor Johan Galtung said recently - 
 "..But imagine it happens: 
		
Killinochchi is flattened, 
		Mr P is dead, 
		LTTE 
		dissolved. Will the Tamil 
		
dream of a Tamil Eelam die? Of course not. It will be revived, and new 
cycles of violence will occur. And probably
		
new CFAs. And possibly the same mistake,
		confusing 
ceasefire with peace, using it as a sleeping pillow to do nothing..." 
		
	 Again it may be that Mr. Raman is not 
	unmindful of the story line in the 
	Marlon Brando film 
	Queimada - 
"... The young boy who guards the captured (rebel leader) Dolores 
stays with him and provides (Director) Pontecorvo with a means of allowing Jose 
Dolores to give his ideas expression through dialogue. Jose Dolores does not 
assail his captor; he tries to inspire and convert him. He tells the young man 
that he does not wish to be released because this would only indicate that it 
was convenient for his enemy. What serves his enemies is harmful to him. 
"Freedom is not something a man can give you," he tells the boy. Dolores is 
cheered by the soldier's questions because, ironically, in men like the soldier 
who helps to put him to death, but who is disturbed and perplexed by Dolores, he 
sees in germination the future revolutionaries of Quemada. To enter the path 
of consciousness is to follow it to rebellion..." 
Mr.Raman is ofcourse,  right to point out that the "statements of the close 
advisers of Rajapakse before the air raid including those of his Foreign 
Minister show considerable naivet� - they seem to think the LTTE can be defeated 
militarily." 
	 But then, it seems that Mr.Raman also 
	displays some considerable naivet� in suggesting that a Sinhala Government 
	can be pressurised to "initiate a political process towards a federal 
	solution"  - unless ofcourse by 'federalism' Mr.Raman had in mind  
	something akin to the
	
	comic opera 'reforms' of the Indo Sri Lanka Accord and the 13th Amendment. 
	 Here, Mr.Raman may gain some insight into the 
	'legitimate aspirations' of the people of Tamil Eelam and even 'enter their 
	path of consciousness' by re-visiting the
	
	words of the Gandhian Tamil leader S.J.V.Chevanayagam more than 30 years 
	ago in 1975 - 
	 "Throughout the ages the Sinhalese and Tamils in the 
	country lived as distinct sovereign people till they were brought under 
	foreign domination. It should be remembered that the Tamils were in the 
	vanguard of the struggle for independence in the full confidence that they 
	also will regain their freedom. 
	We 
	have for the last 25 years made every effort to secure our political rights 
	on the basis of equality with the Sinhalese in a united Ceylon."  
"It is a regrettable fact that successive Sinhalese 
governments have used the power that flows from independence 
to deny us our 
fundamental rights and reduce us to the position of a subject people. These 
governments have been able to do so only by using against the Tamils the 
sovereignty common to the Sinhalese and the Tamils."  
"I wish to announce to my people and to the country that I 
consider the verdict at this election as a mandate that the 
	
Tamil Eelam nation should exercise the sovereignty already vested in the Tamil 
people and become free."
   
	The struggle of the people of Tamil Eelam is 
	not about the LTTE (or about what the LTTE may have or may not have  
	done) - the struggle of the people of Tamil Eelam is 
	about 
	freedom from alien Sinhala rule. Mr.Raman is right to point out that 
	"the LTTE has considerable support from the Sri Lankan Tamils - in Sri Lanka 
	as well as abroad." But Mr.Raman may want to recognise that that support has 
	come about because of the steadfast commitment  of the LTTE to the goal 
	that Thanthai Chelva articulated so eloquently in 1975. And as for "weaning" 
	the People of Tamil Eelam from their thirst for freedom, Mr.Raman may want 
	to address his mind to the words of 
	Aurobindo, a hundred years ago, in Bande Mataram - 
	 "The mistake which despots, benevolent or 
	malevolent, have been making ever since organised states came into existence 
	and which, it seems, they will go on making to the end of the chapter, is 
	that they 
			overestimate their 
	coercive power, which is physical and material and therefore palpable, 
	and underestimate the power and vitality of ideas and sentiments. A 
	feeling or a thought,
			the aspiration 
	towards liberty, cannot be estimated in the terms of concrete power, in 
	so many fighting men, so many armed police, so many guns, so many prisons, 
	such and such laws, ukases, and executive powers. But such feelings and 
	thoughts are more powerful than fighting men and guns and prisons and laws 
	and ukases. Their beginnings are feeble, their end is mighty. But of 
	despotic repression the beginnings are mighty, the end is feeble... But the 
	despot will not recognise this superiority,
			the teachings 
	of history have no meaning for him. ..He is deceived also by the 
	temporary triumph of his
			
	repressive measures.. and thinks, 
�Oh, the circumstances in my case are quite 
different, I am a different thing from any yet recorded in history, stronger, 
more virtuous and moral, better organised. I am God�s favourite and can never 
come to harm.�  
And so the old drama is staged again and acted 
till it reaches the old catastrophe..."  
	Mr.Raman may then begin to understand 
	something about the deep felt feelings of 
	Tamils living today in many lands and across distant seas - feelings 
	encapsulated in their oft repeated aspiration: தமிழரின் தாகம் தமிழ் ஈழத் 
	தாய் அகம். And that thirst is not for 'weaning'. 
 | 
| 
  | 
  
Countering LTTE's 
Air Capability, 26 April 2007 
(To be read in continuation of my earlier article titled
LTTE Air Strike on Katunayake - An Assessment)  
 
There are four likely components of the air capability of the Liberation Tigers 
of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)-----air defence capability, interception capability, 
bombing capability and capability for air terrorism on ground targets.  
 
2. In the past, the LTTE had exhibited fairly effective air defence capability 
in the form of anti-aircraft guns and shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles. 
This has been considerably weakened since 2001 due to its inability to procure 
and smuggle in ammunition for its anti-aircraft guns and replacements for its 
missiles. It has kept reserved whatever ammunition and missiles it still has for 
the protection of Prabakaran, its leader, and its headquarters in the Northern 
Province. It has not brought them into use against the Sri Lankan Air Force 
(SLAF) since the SLAF went into action against the LTTE-held positions and its 
naval wing after April, 2006. This has so far given the SLAF a complete command 
of the skies for nearly a year now. There has not been a single confirmed 
instance of the SLAF losing an aircraft due to effective ground action by the 
LTTE.  
 
3. The LTTE has not so far exhibited any mid-air interception capability. The 
kind of small aircraft it has are not suitable for interception roles. Moreover, 
interception requires greater professional skills, which can normally be 
acquired only in a professional training institution of a state air force. They 
cannot be acquired in a flying club even if it has retired air force officers as 
instructors.  
 
4. The Tamileelam Air Force (TAF) has a good bombing capability as seen from the 
well-planned and well-executed air strikes carried out by it at night on the 
Katunayake air base near Colombo on March 26, 2007, and on the Palaly military 
base in the Jaffna peninsula on April 25, 2007. It has shown technical skills in 
converting small aircraft, which are not meant for such bombing missions, into 
specialised planes capable of undertaking bombing missions. It has also managed 
to get its pilots trained in bombing missions. It is not possible to acquire 
such conversion and bombing skills in a normal flying club. Either they must 
have acquired them in a flying club having retired air force pilots as 
instructors or it has been assisted by retired air force officers of some 
country. It could be retired Tamil pilots of the SLAF, if there are any, or 
retired air force pilots of some foreign country or the other.  
 
5. The LTTE should be presumed to have a capability for air terrorism, though it 
has not so far exhibited it. Air-mounted terrorism does not require any special 
skills. All it requires is individual motivation, a flying object which could be 
even a glider and the ability to glide or fly which could be acquired in any 
flying club. The use of an aircraft for air-mounted terrorism would result in 
the definitive loss of the aircraft. The TAF is estimated to have not more than 
five small planes. It is doubtful whether it would undertake an act of 
air-mounted suicide terrorism and lose a plane except in a desperate situation.
 
 
6. The small TAF does not pose a strategic threat to Sri Lanka. A well-planned 
and well-executed ground strike against a strategic target causes more damage 
than a strike from the air. One had seen the damage caused to the SLAF by the 
LTTE's ground strike in 2001 against the Katunayake airport. The TAF is unlikely 
to turn the tide of the conflict in Sri Lanka in favour of the LTTE. Its value 
is as an image symbol in the eyes of the Sri Lankan Tamils in Sri Lanka and 
abroad and as an additional psywar tool. Every unintercepted air strike of the 
TAF will weaken the credibility of the SLAF in the eyes of its people. Moreover, 
the TAF will add to the defence expenditure of the Government.  
 
7. The most worrisome aspect is that the LTTE has been able to acquire even this 
limited capability without being countered by the intelligence and security 
agencies of Sri Lanka, India and many other countries. Indian media reports 
after the TAF's first air strike of March 26, 2007, had quoted Indian 
intelligence sources as claiming that they knew that the LTTE had procured five 
small aircraft and had passed on the intelligence to the Sri Lankan authorities. 
Their contention was that there was, therefore, no intelligence failure. The 
pertinent question is not whether the TAF has one or a dozen planes, but how it 
was able to clandestinely procure them and smuggle them in right under the nose 
of so many intelligence and physical security agencies without their being able 
to prevent it. It is a serious intelligence and physical security failure. If 
the LTTE can do it today, many other terrorist organisations can do it tomorrow.
 
 
8. There are so many questions for which there are no satisfactory answers. 
Where did the LTTE procure the planes? How did it pay for them? How did it 
manage to smuggle them into the areas controlled by it? How and where did it get 
its pilots trained not only in normal flying, but also in bombing missions? Did 
former pilots of the air force of any country play a role in this? Who are they? 
Wherefrom has it been smuggling the aviation fuel? How has it been able to have 
it transported without being detected? Without answers to these questions, it 
would be difficult to assess the magnitude of the intelligence and security 
lapse.  
 
9. The SLAF has been operating against the LTTE since April, 2006. Its 
operations have been more reactive and punitive than proactive. While it has 
been able to mount some successful reactive operations against the Sea Tigers 
after their ships had ventured out into the seas, it has not mounted a single 
proactive strike against the LTTE's ships in their hide-outs while they are not 
out operating. Successful proactive strikes require precise intelligence of 
their hide-outs, which the SLAF apparently does not have. Despite this, it must 
be noted that the SLAF---even through its successful reactive operations--- has 
been able to restrict the operations of the Sea Tigers.  
 
10. The SLAF's strikes against suspected ground positions of the LTTE have been 
reactive and punitive---more punitive than reactive. They were blind and 
indiscriminate causing large civilian casualties and adding to the anger of the 
Tamils against the Government. There have been very few confirmed targeted 
strikes against the operational nerve-centres of the LTTE. The LTTE has carried 
out a number of decapitation suicide strikes against Government and Tamil 
leaders in Colombo. The Government has, therefore, the right to retaliate in 
kind through targeted strikes against important political and military leaders 
of the LTTE. The SLAF has been fighting shy of doing this either due to want of 
precise intelligence or due to fears of reactions in the Tamil community were 
Prabakaran and others to die in these strikes.  
 
11. The SLAF is still confused as to how to deal with the TAF. It has bombed 
some suspected air strips of the TAF, but this has not prevented the TAF from 
operating. This is because for these small planes no regular air strip is 
required. They could take off from and land in any open space such as a 
playground or a road with a metalled surface. Absence of precise intelligence 
regarding the hide-outs of these planes comes in the way of proactive bombings 
to destroy them on the ground. A good radar cover would help prevent future air 
strikes in the Colombo area, but may not in the Palaly area due to the very 
short distance involved. The SLAF needs a good mid-air interception capability 
to seek and destroy the TAF planes after they are air-borne even if they manage 
to evade ground fire. The kind of Russian, Ukrainian and Israeli planes the SLAF 
has presently are good for bombing missions, but not for mid-air interception 
roles. Moreover, they require regular airfields for take-off and landing. They 
can't scramble fast. The SLAF requires some small, easily manoeuvrable aircraft, 
which can take off and land almost anywhere, with specially-trained pilots.  
 
12. The LTTE, despite all its bravado, cannot use its planes frequently. Loss of 
aircraft due to ground fire or accidents would impair its air capability. The 
law of probability of loss of aircraft would operate more effectively against 
the TAF than against the SLAF. Availability of fuel would be another 
constraining factor. A three-fold strategy is called for: First, ensure that the 
LTTE would not be able to add to its fleet. Second, ensure that it would not be 
able to replenish its stocks of fuel and spare parts for its existing fleet. 
Third, collect precise intelligence about the location of the hide-outs of the 
planes and target them.  
 
13. Sri Lanka alone would not be able to do this. Other countries, including 
India, should help it by effective action against clandestine procurement and 
smuggling by the LTTE. India could take the following steps. First, help Sri 
Lanka in improving its radar cover. Second, intensified and independent sea 
patrolling by ships of the Indian Navy and Coast Guard. All suspect ships should 
be stopped, boarded and searched. Third, issue advisories to all Indian flying 
clubs that no Sri Lankan national should be admitted without the clearance of 
the Government of India. Fourth, verify the background and antecedents of those 
already under training. Fifth, take action to prevent any smuggling of aviation 
fuel by pro-LTTE elements from India. Sixth, use unmanned aerial vehicles to 
spot suspected hide-outs of the TAF. Seventh, periodically use an ELINT aircraft 
of the Aviation Research Centre (ARC) to look for possible ELINT signals 
emanating from the TAF. The TAF pilots would almost definitely observe radio 
silence during their operations and hence the possibility of ELINT signals is 
remote. But still, one must look for them. Eighth, share all actionable 
intelligence promptly with the Sri Lankan authorities.  
  
 | 
| 
  | 
  
Countering LTTE's Air Capability - An Interesting Feed Back, 28 April 2007
	(In response to my article titled "Countering LTTE's Air 
	Capability" at 
	http://www.saag.org/papers23/paper2217.html, many interesting comments 
	have been received. I am giving below the most interesting of them, which 
	gives a lot of elaboration and also questions/corrects some of my 
	observations. This has been received from Mr. Prasun K Sengupta, a Southeast 
	Asia-based regional security analyst who is a regular contributor to FORCE 
	magazine published out of India ,and is also Contributing Editor of TEMPUR, 
	a monthly regional security affairs magazine published from Malaysia. We 
	thank him for his detailed comments, which would enable a better assessment 
	of this issue----B. Raman)  
 
With reference to your analysis titled 'Countering Tigers In Air ' and the 
following questions raised by you, kindly allow me to offer the following 
answers:  
 
1) There are so many questions for which there are no satisfactory answers. 
Where did the LTTE procure the planes?  
 
The aircraft�Zlin Z242L model to be precise�based on published photos thus far 
by the TAF, were bought from a private South African flying club. The aircraft 
were and are built by Moravan Aviation s.r.o., Leti�t� 1578, 765 81 Otrokovice, 
Czech Republic. You yourself can go to the company's website at 
http://www.zlinaircraft.cz/ and check out the aircraft's details yourself.  
 
2) How did it pay for them?  
 
That is the least of the LTTE's problems as any one of the LTTE's front 
companies based in Europe and South Africa could have made the payment. The LTTE 
usually maintains its proxy bank accounts with Standard Chartered Bank. One such 
account was in existence way back in 1999 with US$190 million.  
 
3) How did it manage to smuggle them into the areas controlled by it?  
 
The Zlin Z242L ultra-light model is delivered from its manufacturer in 
completely knocked-down condition and therefore it can be transported 
unsuspecting in kit form and can easily be disguised as automobile parts or 
components for heavy commercial vehicles. By all accounts, the aircraft were 
ferried by sea-freight using forged bills of laden and false declarations were 
made to the Colombo Port-based Customs authorities to deliberately disguise the 
nature of the consignment. Once on land, due to its completely knocked-down 
nature, it was probably transported by land on board commercial freight carriers 
bound for the north-east.  
 
4) How and where did it get its pilots trained not only in normal flying, but 
also in bombing missions? Did former pilots of the air force of any country play 
a role in this? Who are they?  
 
All aspects of flying training and attainment of pilot proficiency levels were 
obtained from the same South Africa-based flying club that ordered the aircraft 
from the Czech Republic. As far as dropping ordnance is concerned, this training 
too was provided in South Africa as there is no dearth of mercenaries there who 
are highly experienced in such flying sorties (they did it day in and day out 
during the numerous civil wars prevailing throughout the African continent). 
That is why it is significant that the first air raid on Colombo was conducted 
at night, an act that requires a high degree of flying proficiency using 
instrument flying ratings (IFR) for the TAF aircrew. It is a well-known fact 
that South African pilots excel in this area. This technique is popularly known 
as 'bush-flying'.  
 
5) Where from has it been smuggling the aviation fuel?  
 
Aircraft like the Zlin Z242L are powered by engines that are multi-fuel, i.e. 
they do not require avgas or aviation fuel. They can be run using ordinary 
diesel. In fact, most flying clubs are nowadays resorting to re-equipping their 
aircraft with such multi-fuel engines as it results in a dramatic reduction in 
the direct operating costs per hour of such aircraft.  
 
6) Successful proactive strikes require precise intelligence of their hide-outs, 
which the SLAF apparently does not have.  
 
Again, this is an area in which the SLAF does have a capability, but it is not 
yet proficient in exploiting its capability. Precise intelligence can only come 
from either ground-based HUMINT, or by airborne assets like long-endurance 
unmanned aerial vehicles like the Searcher Mk2 UAVs already in service and 
delivered by Israel Aircraft Industries. However, UAVs can only locate the 
dispositions of such light aircraft and the ultimate destruction on the ground 
of such Zlin aircraft will have to be performed by either field artillery or by 
a heliborne special operations force.  
 
A good radar cover would help prevent future air strikes in the Colombo area, 
but may not in the Palaly area due to the very short distance involved.  
 
This issue also begs one to raise one more question: did the TAF carry out its 
first air strike on March 26, 2007 knowing fully well that both the BEL-built 
Indra-2 tactical air defence radars were inoperable due to periodic maintenance 
requirements? Or was the radars' shut-down a sheer coincidence? But it must be 
said here that deployment of radars like the Indra-2 is like using a 
sledgehammer to kill an ant. Such radars are used only for detecting low-flying 
aircraft (at an altitude of 500 feet) inbound at high speeds, NOT an 
experimental-category aircraft like the Zlin, which is normally used for 
recreational flying and therefore has a minimal radar cross-section. The Zlin 
has been employed before in South Africa to drop light ordnance when flying at 
an altitude of only 200 feet. Therefore the India-origin radars of the SLAF are 
next to useless as of now. What the SLAF now needs to do is to procure tactical 
low-level manportable radars like the EL/M-2106NG made by Israel Aircraft 
Industries' ELTA Systems Division. This type of radar has its operating 
parameters optimised for detecting airborne targets with radar cross-sections 
similar to those of the Zlin ultralight. It is reliably learnt that the SLAF, 
due to cost grounds, is now negotiating with China for procuring a similar radar 
with matching performance. Contract negotiations are now underway for procuring 
up to four such radars for the air defence of Colombo.  
 
7) The SLAF needs a good mid-air interception capability to seek and destroy the 
TAF planes after they are airborne even if they manage to evade ground fire. The 
kind of Russian, Ukrainian and Israeli planes the SLAF has presently are good 
for bombing missions, but not for mid-air interception roles. Moreover, they 
require regular airfields for takeoff and landing. They can't scramble fast. The 
SLAF requires some small, easily manoeuverable aircraft, which can take off and 
land almost anywhere, with specially-trained pilots.  
 
With due respect, you have gone off on a tangent here. Both the Kfir C-2/7 (from 
Israel) and MiG-27M (acquired from Ukraine, with six more ordered late last 
year) of the SLAF are equipped with both airborne cannons as well as short-range 
air-to-air missiles like the Vympel R-60T. Manoeuvrability is not a factor here 
as even the Zlin cannot pull off high-G manoeuvres! The main limiting factor of 
the MiG-27M is its ability to search for an airborne target as it does not have 
an internally-mounted airborne fire-control radar, which is required if an 
aerial interception is required to take place at night. The Kfir C-2/7 on the 
other hand does have such a radar and can be used for aerial interception at 
night. The MiG-27M, though, can be effectively used to launch the R-60T during 
daytime when there are no visibility problems. As far as scramble times go, both 
these aircraft types can scramble within 1 minute 57 seconds but only if they 
are maintained on an alert status known as quick reaction alert (QRA). But then 
again, it will be highly expensive and unwise to use combat aircraft to shoot 
down the Zlins. What the SLAF needs are a small batch (only a Battery) of 
shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles like the FIOM-92A Stinger or the 
Chinese FN-6 or the Russian IGLA-S, all of which can be integrated with the 
early warning alerting mode of low-level air defence radars like the 
EL/M-2108NG. This is a more cost-effective approach.  
 
In terms of pro-actively seeking out the TAF's aircraft assets, a two-pronged 
approach could be adopted on a one-off basis: using satellites equipped with 
synthetic aperture radars (like the private Canadian RADARSAT); or using 
aircraft such as Su-30MKI Mk3s to make a couple of sweeps over suspected TAF 
hideouts, provided the Zlins are stored at ground level, and not in underground 
bunkers.  
 
8) Periodically use an ELINT aircraft of the Aviation Research Centre (ARC) to 
look for possible ELINT signals emanating from the TAF.  
 
Again, such action is deemed highly cost-prohibitive. SIGINT and ELINT aircraft 
are normally employed for at least 10-hour continuous flight durations and the 
sortie profile is pre-arranged because the end-user/operator knows precisely 
what to look for and where to look. In the LTTE's case, such airborne 
ELINT/SIGINT sorties are totally worthless. A far more pragmatic approach will 
be to install such SIGINT/ELINT mission sensors on board both the Indian Navy 
and Coast Guard Do-229-201s that are tasked with flying routine surveillance 
sorties adjacent to the airspace of northern Sri Lanka, and installing similar 
hardware on board the Coast Guard vessels patrolling the seas off Rameshwaram 
and Jaffna.  
 
   |