CONTENTS OF
THIS SECTION
19/09/09 |
India & the
Struggle for Tamil Eelam
On LTTE's Air Capability
B.Raman,
South Asia Analysis Group (SAAG)
LTTE Air Strike on Katunayake - An Assessment, 27 March 2007
Another Pre-Emptive LTTE Air Strike, 24 April 2007
Countering LTTE's
Air Capability, 26 April 2007
Countering LTTE's Air Capability - An Interesting Feed Back, 28 April
2007
[see also
Katunayake Military Airbase Bombed by LTTE Air Wing, 25 March 2007 ;
Liberation Tigers bomb Sri Lankan military�s main base complex in Jaffna
and
Liberation Tigers bomb Fuel Refinery in Kolonnawa near Colombo, 28 April
2007]
LTTE Air Strike on Katunayake - An Assessment,
B.Raman,
South Asia Analysis Group (SAAG)
27 March 2007
"The TAF's [Tamileelam Air Force's] air strike was
well-planned and equally well-executed. It was a night operation taking
advantage of the weak capability of the SLAF for night operations. It was a
precision attack, which carefully avoided causing any casualty or damage in
the international airport, which could have roused international ire. There
were no civilian casualties----targeted or collateral. As a result, it would
not be possible to characterise the attack as an act of terrorism. It was
pure and simple a conventional air strike...
The LTTE should not be allowed to retain its TAF. The matter
should be taken up in the UN Security Council under Resolution 1373 and an
ultimatum issued to the LTTE to surrender its planes to observers appointed by
the UNSC. If it fails do so, the bank accounts of all members of the Sri Lankan
Tamil diaspora suspected or known to be funding the LTTE should be frozen as a
first step to make it see reason. If it continues to be defiant, other measures
have to be considered like knocking them out. These measures have to be combined
with pressure on the Rajapakse Government to initiate a political process
towards a federal solution. Unilateral action only against the LTTE without
simultaneous action against the Rajapakse Government or vice versa will prove
counter-productive."
The Sri Lankan Government has imposed a total black-out on the
losses suffered by it from the conventional air strike launched by the Tamil
Eelam Air Force (TAF) of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) on the air
base of the Sri Lankan Air Force (SLAF) at Katunayake outside Colombo on March
26,2007. The air base is located adjoining the international airport. The
black-out is meant to hamper any damage assessment by the media and other
analysts -from Sri Lanka as well as outside. One has to therefore, depend on
source reports.
2. The only information which the Government has given out is that two
helicopters were damaged. It has tried to create an impression as if there was
no damage to its fighter aircraft. Source reports, on the other hand, indicate
that the TAF air strike has severely damaged, if not destroyed, at least a half
of the aircraft holdings of the SLAF. The truth will be known only if and when
the SLAF resumes its operations in the Tamil areas. If the Government's
contention that there was no damage to its fighter aircraft is correct, then
there would be no impact on its air operations in the Tamil areas. If the source
reports' contention is correct, one would see a marked decrease in the SLAF's
air operations in the days to come.
3. The TAF's air strike was well-planned and equally well-executed. It was a
night operation taking advantage of the weak capability of the SLAF for night
operations. It was a precision attack, which carefully avoided causing any
casualty or damage in the international airport, which could have roused
international ire. There were no civilian casualties----targeted or collateral.
As a result, it would not be possible to characterise the attack as an act of
terrorism. It was pure and simple a conventional air strike. The bombs targeted
the hangar or hangars at the base inside which the aircraft of the SLAF are
normally parked at night. Three SLAF personnel were killed and about 20 injured.
It is not yet known whether they were the maintenance people or whether any of
them were pilots. Maintenance casualties can be easily replaced, but not pilot
casualties.
4.Some worrisome questions arise. Even professional pilots of a State Air Force
need regular flying practice. You can't just assemble or take out an aircraft
from a hide-out and fly out on a bombing mission. Where were the TAF pilots
doing their flying practice? How come the Air Force intelligence set-ups of Sri
Lanka as well as India missed detecting these training flights of the TAF? One
needs fuel for the aircraft. From the way the LTTE has been warning of more air
attacks, it seems to have an adequate reserve of fuel. Where from it got the
fuel? Hopefully, not from India. Since April last year, when the Government of
President Mahinda Rajapakse started using the SLAF, the latter has been claiming
that it had repeatedly bombed the air strip of the TAF. When an air strip is
bombed, it takes time to repair it. How did the LTTE manage to repair it without
any problem? Or, does it have another air strip, which has not come to the
notice of the Sri Lankan intelligence?
5. The air strike was a daring operation. The TAF aircraft were air-borne for a
little over two hours. There was every danger of the aircraft being intercepted
and destroyed by the SLAF. The fact that the LTTE leadership decided to face
this risk speaks of a certain desperation behind the decision to launch the air
strike. One could detect a similar desperation in its efforts to smuggle
material required for improvised explosive devices (IEDS) from Tamil Nadu. Since
November,2006, a number of consignments of ball bearings, aluminium and similar
material intended for smuggling to the LTTE-controlled areas have been
intercepted by the Tamil Nadu Police and the Coast Guard. "The Hindu" of March
24,2007, has reported that one of the arrested persons admitted during the
interrogation that one consignment had managed to reach Sri Lanka. (see item
titled " Two Held in Iron Balls Seizure Case" on Page 8). Two conclusions
emerge: First, the LTTE is so desperate for replenishments from Tamil Nadu that
it is prepared to face the risk of the arrest of some of its collaborators in
Tamil Nadu. Second, if one consignment managed to avoid detection and
interception and reach the LTTE, there is a strong possibility of more
consignments having reached the LTTE. This reveals gaps in our counter-LTTE
security measures.
6.This desperation has arisen from the LTTE's fears that the Sri Lankan Armed
Forces were planning to launch an offensive in the Northern Province after
having ejected the LTTE from nearly 85 per cent of the total territory in the
Eastern Province. If the SL Armed Forces score similar successes in the Northern
Province, that could deal a severe blow to the LTTE's political objectives. LTTE
spokesmen have been repeatedly hinting that any offensive in the North would
lead to a blood-bath in areas outside the Eastern and Northern Provinces.The Sri
Lankan Armed Forces and their Foreign Office were treating these warnings
casually as the dying gasp of the LTTE. Through its daring air strike, the LTTE
has conveyed a credible message that it may be down, but not out. It still has a
lot of daring, fight and innovative ability left in it.
7.The Sri Lankan Armed Forces would be stupid to over-estimate the significance
of their successes in the Eastern Province and under-estimate the LTTE's
capabilities in the Northern Province. The successes in the Eastern Province
were largely due to the role played by Karuna and his men, and the ruthless use
of the SLAF and the heavy artillery of Pakistani origin. Karuna is a former
commander of the LTTE from the Batticaloa District of the Eastern Province, who
deserted from the LTTE in March 2004 due to differences with Prabakaran.
The LTTE did not consider it necessary to use the TAF to prevent
the set-backs in the Eastern Province. It is facing a serious shortage of
anti-aircraft weapons and ammunition, but still has some, which have been kept
in the reserve for use in the North and to prevent a decapitation strike against
Prabakaran. The Sri Lankan Army will have to operate in the North without the
support of Karuna and his men, who are detested there as Sinhalese quislings.
Moreover, the LTTE's soldiers will be fighting in their own area with which they
are familiar. Any operations in the North will see the LTTE fighting
ferociously----possibly making full use of its air and anti-aircraft capability.
It will hit out against the Sinhalese in the rest of Sri Lanka. It is not doing
so presently due to fears of a backlash against the Tamils living in the
Sinhalese majority areas, but a desperate LTTE will not be inhibited by such
considerations.
8. The demonstrated air attack capability of the LTTE poses immediate, short,
medium and long-term threats to Sri Lanka and medium and long-term threats to
India. The first immediate threat is to the security of President Rajapakse and
other VIPs. The ability to use an aircraft---either conventionally or through a
suicide mission--- will enable the LTTE to circumvent access control measures.
Without effective access control, there is no effective VIP security. The second
immediate threat is psychological---the negative impact on foreign tourists and
investors. This impact will be enhanced if the TAF carries out attacks on
economic targets.
9. The third immediate impact is also psychological on the minds of the Sri
Lankan Tamils. Prabakaran is stated to be a voracious reader. He reads
everything that is available on guerilla warfare, covert actions etc. A
favourite quote of his from one of these books is:" Those, who dare, win". It is
said that this quote is exhibited in all training centres of the LTTE. The TAF
dared on the morning of March 26 against tremendous odds. It succeeded. There
was elation among the Sri Lankan Tamils all over the world. Many champagne
bottles were broken by members of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. An added reason
for this elation is stated to be the fact that all the TAF pilots are from the
diaspora. One could see a fresh flow of volunteers to join the LTTE from Sri
Lanka itself as well as from the diaspora. And a fresh flow of funds.
10. To neutralise these psychological impacts, the the SLAF has to demonstrate
quickly that its capability and morale have not been affected. Can it do so? It
is very important.
11.The short, medium and long-term threats to Sri Lanka will arise if as a
result of this demonstrated air capability of the TAF, the SLAF loses its
present air superiority. If that happens, the SL Armed Forces and the LTTE will
be more evenly matched on the ground than they are today. That means continuing
bloodshed and the danger of Tamil Eelam becoming a reality one day.
The statements of the close advisers of Rajapakse before the air
raid including those of his Foreign Minister show considerable naivete. They
seem to think the LTTE can be defeated militarily. The only instances in recent
history where terrorist organisations have collapsed without achieving any of
their stated objectives are those of the Khalistanis and of the Western
ideological groups such as the German Red Army Faction. They collapsed or
withered away because they had no support from the people for whose cause they
claimed to be fighting.
The LTTE has considerable support from the Sri Lankan
Tamils---in Sri Lanka as well as abroad. Unless they are weaned away from the
LTTE through appropriate political measures, a military victory is doubtful.
Repeated bombing raids by the SLAF on Sri Lankan Tamils in order to intimidate
them are not the way of winning over the Tamils.
Barring the US, which has been heavily using air strikes against
the Neo Taliban in Afghanistan and the terrorists and resistance-fighters in
Iraq, without any significant success, and Israel, which did so in the Lebanon
in July last year, no other country in the world uses air strikes for
counter-insurgency operations in such a ruthless manner as the Rajapakse
Government has been doing. At the least the US and Israel have been bombing
foreign people in foreign territory, but the Rajapakse Government has been
bombing from air its own people in its own territory.
12. There is no immediate security threat to India. The medium and long-term
threats will arise from the likelihood of copy-cat terrorism and the LTTE one
day using it against an Indian target. India has any number of terrorist and
insurgent organisations active in different parts of the country. Some of them
might be tempted to emulate the LTTE. Successful development and use of an
independent air strike capability by a terrorist organisation is largely
conditional on its having territorial control over the rural areas. Purely urban
terrorist organisations would find it difficult to develop an independent air
capability. In India, the Naxalites (Maoists) have effective control over large
parts of rural areas. One has to be careful about them.
13. India is no stranger to air terrorism. The plane hijackings by the Jammu and
Kashmir Liberation Front, the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen and the Khalistanis, the
blowing-up of the Kanishka aircraft of Air India by the Babbar Khalsa of Canada
and the clandestine air drop of weapons by a plane manned by a mercenary crew in
Purulia were instances of air terrorism. In the early 1990s, a member of the
Babbar Khalsa trained by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence had stated
during his interrogation that the ISI had asked him to join the Mumbai Flyting
Club, take a trainer aircraft up and crash it on the Bombay High Oil platform.
Such instances of air terrorism can be prevented by effective physical security
on the ground.
14. But when an insurgent or a terrorist organisation acquires an independent
air strike capability, the task of countering it becomes much more difficult.
Preventive intelligence is an effective way, but it totally failed in the case
of the LTTE. It was able to hoodwink the intelligence agencies of many
countries---including those of India, Sri Lanka and the European countries---
get its pilots recruited from the diaspora and trained in foreign training
institutions ---like Al Qaeda did-- and smuggle the aircraft in dismantled forms
to the areas controlled by it.
15. The LTTE should not be allowed to retain its TAF. The matter should be taken
up in the UN Security Council under Resolution 1373 and an ultimatum issued to
the LTTE to surrender its planes to observers appointed by the UNSC. If it fails
do so, the bank accounts of all members of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora
suspected or known to be funding the LTTE should be frozen as a first step to
make it see reason. If it continues to be defiant, other measures have to be
considered like knocking them out. These measures have to be combined with
pressure on the Rajapakse Government to initiate a political process towards a
federal solution. Unilateral action only against the LTTE without simultaneous
action against the Rajapakse Government or vice versa will prove
counter-productive.
|
Comment by
tamilnation.org
- Mr.Raman is right to point out in
LTTE Air Strike on Katunayake - An Assessment
that "unilateral action only against the LTTE without simultaneous action
against the Rajapakse Government will prove counter-productive." It
may be that Mr.Raman is only too aware of something which
Professor Johan Galtung said recently -
"..But imagine it happens:
Killinochchi is flattened,
Mr P is dead,
LTTE
dissolved. Will the Tamil
dream of a Tamil Eelam die? Of course not. It will be revived, and new
cycles of violence will occur. And probably
new CFAs. And possibly the same mistake,
confusing
ceasefire with peace, using it as a sleeping pillow to do nothing..."
Again it may be that Mr. Raman is not
unmindful of the story line in the
Marlon Brando film
Queimada -
"... The young boy who guards the captured (rebel leader) Dolores
stays with him and provides (Director) Pontecorvo with a means of allowing Jose
Dolores to give his ideas expression through dialogue. Jose Dolores does not
assail his captor; he tries to inspire and convert him. He tells the young man
that he does not wish to be released because this would only indicate that it
was convenient for his enemy. What serves his enemies is harmful to him.
"Freedom is not something a man can give you," he tells the boy. Dolores is
cheered by the soldier's questions because, ironically, in men like the soldier
who helps to put him to death, but who is disturbed and perplexed by Dolores, he
sees in germination the future revolutionaries of Quemada. To enter the path
of consciousness is to follow it to rebellion..."
Mr.Raman is ofcourse, right to point out that the "statements of the close
advisers of Rajapakse before the air raid including those of his Foreign
Minister show considerable naivet� - they seem to think the LTTE can be defeated
militarily."
But then, it seems that Mr.Raman also
displays some considerable naivet� in suggesting that a Sinhala Government
can be pressurised to "initiate a political process towards a federal
solution" - unless ofcourse by 'federalism' Mr.Raman had in mind
something akin to the
comic opera 'reforms' of the Indo Sri Lanka Accord and the 13th Amendment.
Here, Mr.Raman may gain some insight into the
'legitimate aspirations' of the people of Tamil Eelam and even 'enter their
path of consciousness' by re-visiting the
words of the Gandhian Tamil leader S.J.V.Chevanayagam more than 30 years
ago in 1975 -
"Throughout the ages the Sinhalese and Tamils in the
country lived as distinct sovereign people till they were brought under
foreign domination. It should be remembered that the Tamils were in the
vanguard of the struggle for independence in the full confidence that they
also will regain their freedom.
We
have for the last 25 years made every effort to secure our political rights
on the basis of equality with the Sinhalese in a united Ceylon."
"It is a regrettable fact that successive Sinhalese
governments have used the power that flows from independence
to deny us our
fundamental rights and reduce us to the position of a subject people. These
governments have been able to do so only by using against the Tamils the
sovereignty common to the Sinhalese and the Tamils."
"I wish to announce to my people and to the country that I
consider the verdict at this election as a mandate that the
Tamil Eelam nation should exercise the sovereignty already vested in the Tamil
people and become free."
The struggle of the people of Tamil Eelam is
not about the LTTE (or about what the LTTE may have or may not have
done) - the struggle of the people of Tamil Eelam is
about
freedom from alien Sinhala rule. Mr.Raman is right to point out that
"the LTTE has considerable support from the Sri Lankan Tamils - in Sri Lanka
as well as abroad." But Mr.Raman may want to recognise that that support has
come about because of the steadfast commitment of the LTTE to the goal
that Thanthai Chelva articulated so eloquently in 1975. And as for "weaning"
the People of Tamil Eelam from their thirst for freedom, Mr.Raman may want
to address his mind to the words of
Aurobindo, a hundred years ago, in Bande Mataram -
"The mistake which despots, benevolent or
malevolent, have been making ever since organised states came into existence
and which, it seems, they will go on making to the end of the chapter, is
that they
overestimate their
coercive power, which is physical and material and therefore palpable,
and underestimate the power and vitality of ideas and sentiments. A
feeling or a thought,
the aspiration
towards liberty, cannot be estimated in the terms of concrete power, in
so many fighting men, so many armed police, so many guns, so many prisons,
such and such laws, ukases, and executive powers. But such feelings and
thoughts are more powerful than fighting men and guns and prisons and laws
and ukases. Their beginnings are feeble, their end is mighty. But of
despotic repression the beginnings are mighty, the end is feeble... But the
despot will not recognise this superiority,
the teachings
of history have no meaning for him. ..He is deceived also by the
temporary triumph of his
repressive measures.. and thinks,
�Oh, the circumstances in my case are quite
different, I am a different thing from any yet recorded in history, stronger,
more virtuous and moral, better organised. I am God�s favourite and can never
come to harm.�
And so the old drama is staged again and acted
till it reaches the old catastrophe..."
Mr.Raman may then begin to understand
something about the deep felt feelings of
Tamils living today in many lands and across distant seas - feelings
encapsulated in their oft repeated aspiration: தமிழரின் தாகம் தமிழ் ஈழத்
தாய் அகம். And that thirst is not for 'weaning'.
|
|
Countering LTTE's
Air Capability, 26 April 2007
(To be read in continuation of my earlier article titled
LTTE Air Strike on Katunayake - An Assessment)
There are four likely components of the air capability of the Liberation Tigers
of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)-----air defence capability, interception capability,
bombing capability and capability for air terrorism on ground targets.
2. In the past, the LTTE had exhibited fairly effective air defence capability
in the form of anti-aircraft guns and shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles.
This has been considerably weakened since 2001 due to its inability to procure
and smuggle in ammunition for its anti-aircraft guns and replacements for its
missiles. It has kept reserved whatever ammunition and missiles it still has for
the protection of Prabakaran, its leader, and its headquarters in the Northern
Province. It has not brought them into use against the Sri Lankan Air Force
(SLAF) since the SLAF went into action against the LTTE-held positions and its
naval wing after April, 2006. This has so far given the SLAF a complete command
of the skies for nearly a year now. There has not been a single confirmed
instance of the SLAF losing an aircraft due to effective ground action by the
LTTE.
3. The LTTE has not so far exhibited any mid-air interception capability. The
kind of small aircraft it has are not suitable for interception roles. Moreover,
interception requires greater professional skills, which can normally be
acquired only in a professional training institution of a state air force. They
cannot be acquired in a flying club even if it has retired air force officers as
instructors.
4. The Tamileelam Air Force (TAF) has a good bombing capability as seen from the
well-planned and well-executed air strikes carried out by it at night on the
Katunayake air base near Colombo on March 26, 2007, and on the Palaly military
base in the Jaffna peninsula on April 25, 2007. It has shown technical skills in
converting small aircraft, which are not meant for such bombing missions, into
specialised planes capable of undertaking bombing missions. It has also managed
to get its pilots trained in bombing missions. It is not possible to acquire
such conversion and bombing skills in a normal flying club. Either they must
have acquired them in a flying club having retired air force pilots as
instructors or it has been assisted by retired air force officers of some
country. It could be retired Tamil pilots of the SLAF, if there are any, or
retired air force pilots of some foreign country or the other.
5. The LTTE should be presumed to have a capability for air terrorism, though it
has not so far exhibited it. Air-mounted terrorism does not require any special
skills. All it requires is individual motivation, a flying object which could be
even a glider and the ability to glide or fly which could be acquired in any
flying club. The use of an aircraft for air-mounted terrorism would result in
the definitive loss of the aircraft. The TAF is estimated to have not more than
five small planes. It is doubtful whether it would undertake an act of
air-mounted suicide terrorism and lose a plane except in a desperate situation.
6. The small TAF does not pose a strategic threat to Sri Lanka. A well-planned
and well-executed ground strike against a strategic target causes more damage
than a strike from the air. One had seen the damage caused to the SLAF by the
LTTE's ground strike in 2001 against the Katunayake airport. The TAF is unlikely
to turn the tide of the conflict in Sri Lanka in favour of the LTTE. Its value
is as an image symbol in the eyes of the Sri Lankan Tamils in Sri Lanka and
abroad and as an additional psywar tool. Every unintercepted air strike of the
TAF will weaken the credibility of the SLAF in the eyes of its people. Moreover,
the TAF will add to the defence expenditure of the Government.
7. The most worrisome aspect is that the LTTE has been able to acquire even this
limited capability without being countered by the intelligence and security
agencies of Sri Lanka, India and many other countries. Indian media reports
after the TAF's first air strike of March 26, 2007, had quoted Indian
intelligence sources as claiming that they knew that the LTTE had procured five
small aircraft and had passed on the intelligence to the Sri Lankan authorities.
Their contention was that there was, therefore, no intelligence failure. The
pertinent question is not whether the TAF has one or a dozen planes, but how it
was able to clandestinely procure them and smuggle them in right under the nose
of so many intelligence and physical security agencies without their being able
to prevent it. It is a serious intelligence and physical security failure. If
the LTTE can do it today, many other terrorist organisations can do it tomorrow.
8. There are so many questions for which there are no satisfactory answers.
Where did the LTTE procure the planes? How did it pay for them? How did it
manage to smuggle them into the areas controlled by it? How and where did it get
its pilots trained not only in normal flying, but also in bombing missions? Did
former pilots of the air force of any country play a role in this? Who are they?
Wherefrom has it been smuggling the aviation fuel? How has it been able to have
it transported without being detected? Without answers to these questions, it
would be difficult to assess the magnitude of the intelligence and security
lapse.
9. The SLAF has been operating against the LTTE since April, 2006. Its
operations have been more reactive and punitive than proactive. While it has
been able to mount some successful reactive operations against the Sea Tigers
after their ships had ventured out into the seas, it has not mounted a single
proactive strike against the LTTE's ships in their hide-outs while they are not
out operating. Successful proactive strikes require precise intelligence of
their hide-outs, which the SLAF apparently does not have. Despite this, it must
be noted that the SLAF---even through its successful reactive operations--- has
been able to restrict the operations of the Sea Tigers.
10. The SLAF's strikes against suspected ground positions of the LTTE have been
reactive and punitive---more punitive than reactive. They were blind and
indiscriminate causing large civilian casualties and adding to the anger of the
Tamils against the Government. There have been very few confirmed targeted
strikes against the operational nerve-centres of the LTTE. The LTTE has carried
out a number of decapitation suicide strikes against Government and Tamil
leaders in Colombo. The Government has, therefore, the right to retaliate in
kind through targeted strikes against important political and military leaders
of the LTTE. The SLAF has been fighting shy of doing this either due to want of
precise intelligence or due to fears of reactions in the Tamil community were
Prabakaran and others to die in these strikes.
11. The SLAF is still confused as to how to deal with the TAF. It has bombed
some suspected air strips of the TAF, but this has not prevented the TAF from
operating. This is because for these small planes no regular air strip is
required. They could take off from and land in any open space such as a
playground or a road with a metalled surface. Absence of precise intelligence
regarding the hide-outs of these planes comes in the way of proactive bombings
to destroy them on the ground. A good radar cover would help prevent future air
strikes in the Colombo area, but may not in the Palaly area due to the very
short distance involved. The SLAF needs a good mid-air interception capability
to seek and destroy the TAF planes after they are air-borne even if they manage
to evade ground fire. The kind of Russian, Ukrainian and Israeli planes the SLAF
has presently are good for bombing missions, but not for mid-air interception
roles. Moreover, they require regular airfields for take-off and landing. They
can't scramble fast. The SLAF requires some small, easily manoeuvrable aircraft,
which can take off and land almost anywhere, with specially-trained pilots.
12. The LTTE, despite all its bravado, cannot use its planes frequently. Loss of
aircraft due to ground fire or accidents would impair its air capability. The
law of probability of loss of aircraft would operate more effectively against
the TAF than against the SLAF. Availability of fuel would be another
constraining factor. A three-fold strategy is called for: First, ensure that the
LTTE would not be able to add to its fleet. Second, ensure that it would not be
able to replenish its stocks of fuel and spare parts for its existing fleet.
Third, collect precise intelligence about the location of the hide-outs of the
planes and target them.
13. Sri Lanka alone would not be able to do this. Other countries, including
India, should help it by effective action against clandestine procurement and
smuggling by the LTTE. India could take the following steps. First, help Sri
Lanka in improving its radar cover. Second, intensified and independent sea
patrolling by ships of the Indian Navy and Coast Guard. All suspect ships should
be stopped, boarded and searched. Third, issue advisories to all Indian flying
clubs that no Sri Lankan national should be admitted without the clearance of
the Government of India. Fourth, verify the background and antecedents of those
already under training. Fifth, take action to prevent any smuggling of aviation
fuel by pro-LTTE elements from India. Sixth, use unmanned aerial vehicles to
spot suspected hide-outs of the TAF. Seventh, periodically use an ELINT aircraft
of the Aviation Research Centre (ARC) to look for possible ELINT signals
emanating from the TAF. The TAF pilots would almost definitely observe radio
silence during their operations and hence the possibility of ELINT signals is
remote. But still, one must look for them. Eighth, share all actionable
intelligence promptly with the Sri Lankan authorities.
|
|
Countering LTTE's Air Capability - An Interesting Feed Back, 28 April 2007
(In response to my article titled "Countering LTTE's Air
Capability" at
http://www.saag.org/papers23/paper2217.html, many interesting comments
have been received. I am giving below the most interesting of them, which
gives a lot of elaboration and also questions/corrects some of my
observations. This has been received from Mr. Prasun K Sengupta, a Southeast
Asia-based regional security analyst who is a regular contributor to FORCE
magazine published out of India ,and is also Contributing Editor of TEMPUR,
a monthly regional security affairs magazine published from Malaysia. We
thank him for his detailed comments, which would enable a better assessment
of this issue----B. Raman)
With reference to your analysis titled 'Countering Tigers In Air ' and the
following questions raised by you, kindly allow me to offer the following
answers:
1) There are so many questions for which there are no satisfactory answers.
Where did the LTTE procure the planes?
The aircraft�Zlin Z242L model to be precise�based on published photos thus far
by the TAF, were bought from a private South African flying club. The aircraft
were and are built by Moravan Aviation s.r.o., Leti�t� 1578, 765 81 Otrokovice,
Czech Republic. You yourself can go to the company's website at
http://www.zlinaircraft.cz/ and check out the aircraft's details yourself.
2) How did it pay for them?
That is the least of the LTTE's problems as any one of the LTTE's front
companies based in Europe and South Africa could have made the payment. The LTTE
usually maintains its proxy bank accounts with Standard Chartered Bank. One such
account was in existence way back in 1999 with US$190 million.
3) How did it manage to smuggle them into the areas controlled by it?
The Zlin Z242L ultra-light model is delivered from its manufacturer in
completely knocked-down condition and therefore it can be transported
unsuspecting in kit form and can easily be disguised as automobile parts or
components for heavy commercial vehicles. By all accounts, the aircraft were
ferried by sea-freight using forged bills of laden and false declarations were
made to the Colombo Port-based Customs authorities to deliberately disguise the
nature of the consignment. Once on land, due to its completely knocked-down
nature, it was probably transported by land on board commercial freight carriers
bound for the north-east.
4) How and where did it get its pilots trained not only in normal flying, but
also in bombing missions? Did former pilots of the air force of any country play
a role in this? Who are they?
All aspects of flying training and attainment of pilot proficiency levels were
obtained from the same South Africa-based flying club that ordered the aircraft
from the Czech Republic. As far as dropping ordnance is concerned, this training
too was provided in South Africa as there is no dearth of mercenaries there who
are highly experienced in such flying sorties (they did it day in and day out
during the numerous civil wars prevailing throughout the African continent).
That is why it is significant that the first air raid on Colombo was conducted
at night, an act that requires a high degree of flying proficiency using
instrument flying ratings (IFR) for the TAF aircrew. It is a well-known fact
that South African pilots excel in this area. This technique is popularly known
as 'bush-flying'.
5) Where from has it been smuggling the aviation fuel?
Aircraft like the Zlin Z242L are powered by engines that are multi-fuel, i.e.
they do not require avgas or aviation fuel. They can be run using ordinary
diesel. In fact, most flying clubs are nowadays resorting to re-equipping their
aircraft with such multi-fuel engines as it results in a dramatic reduction in
the direct operating costs per hour of such aircraft.
6) Successful proactive strikes require precise intelligence of their hide-outs,
which the SLAF apparently does not have.
Again, this is an area in which the SLAF does have a capability, but it is not
yet proficient in exploiting its capability. Precise intelligence can only come
from either ground-based HUMINT, or by airborne assets like long-endurance
unmanned aerial vehicles like the Searcher Mk2 UAVs already in service and
delivered by Israel Aircraft Industries. However, UAVs can only locate the
dispositions of such light aircraft and the ultimate destruction on the ground
of such Zlin aircraft will have to be performed by either field artillery or by
a heliborne special operations force.
A good radar cover would help prevent future air strikes in the Colombo area,
but may not in the Palaly area due to the very short distance involved.
This issue also begs one to raise one more question: did the TAF carry out its
first air strike on March 26, 2007 knowing fully well that both the BEL-built
Indra-2 tactical air defence radars were inoperable due to periodic maintenance
requirements? Or was the radars' shut-down a sheer coincidence? But it must be
said here that deployment of radars like the Indra-2 is like using a
sledgehammer to kill an ant. Such radars are used only for detecting low-flying
aircraft (at an altitude of 500 feet) inbound at high speeds, NOT an
experimental-category aircraft like the Zlin, which is normally used for
recreational flying and therefore has a minimal radar cross-section. The Zlin
has been employed before in South Africa to drop light ordnance when flying at
an altitude of only 200 feet. Therefore the India-origin radars of the SLAF are
next to useless as of now. What the SLAF now needs to do is to procure tactical
low-level manportable radars like the EL/M-2106NG made by Israel Aircraft
Industries' ELTA Systems Division. This type of radar has its operating
parameters optimised for detecting airborne targets with radar cross-sections
similar to those of the Zlin ultralight. It is reliably learnt that the SLAF,
due to cost grounds, is now negotiating with China for procuring a similar radar
with matching performance. Contract negotiations are now underway for procuring
up to four such radars for the air defence of Colombo.
7) The SLAF needs a good mid-air interception capability to seek and destroy the
TAF planes after they are airborne even if they manage to evade ground fire. The
kind of Russian, Ukrainian and Israeli planes the SLAF has presently are good
for bombing missions, but not for mid-air interception roles. Moreover, they
require regular airfields for takeoff and landing. They can't scramble fast. The
SLAF requires some small, easily manoeuverable aircraft, which can take off and
land almost anywhere, with specially-trained pilots.
With due respect, you have gone off on a tangent here. Both the Kfir C-2/7 (from
Israel) and MiG-27M (acquired from Ukraine, with six more ordered late last
year) of the SLAF are equipped with both airborne cannons as well as short-range
air-to-air missiles like the Vympel R-60T. Manoeuvrability is not a factor here
as even the Zlin cannot pull off high-G manoeuvres! The main limiting factor of
the MiG-27M is its ability to search for an airborne target as it does not have
an internally-mounted airborne fire-control radar, which is required if an
aerial interception is required to take place at night. The Kfir C-2/7 on the
other hand does have such a radar and can be used for aerial interception at
night. The MiG-27M, though, can be effectively used to launch the R-60T during
daytime when there are no visibility problems. As far as scramble times go, both
these aircraft types can scramble within 1 minute 57 seconds but only if they
are maintained on an alert status known as quick reaction alert (QRA). But then
again, it will be highly expensive and unwise to use combat aircraft to shoot
down the Zlins. What the SLAF needs are a small batch (only a Battery) of
shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles like the FIOM-92A Stinger or the
Chinese FN-6 or the Russian IGLA-S, all of which can be integrated with the
early warning alerting mode of low-level air defence radars like the
EL/M-2108NG. This is a more cost-effective approach.
In terms of pro-actively seeking out the TAF's aircraft assets, a two-pronged
approach could be adopted on a one-off basis: using satellites equipped with
synthetic aperture radars (like the private Canadian RADARSAT); or using
aircraft such as Su-30MKI Mk3s to make a couple of sweeps over suspected TAF
hideouts, provided the Zlins are stored at ground level, and not in underground
bunkers.
8) Periodically use an ELINT aircraft of the Aviation Research Centre (ARC) to
look for possible ELINT signals emanating from the TAF.
Again, such action is deemed highly cost-prohibitive. SIGINT and ELINT aircraft
are normally employed for at least 10-hour continuous flight durations and the
sortie profile is pre-arranged because the end-user/operator knows precisely
what to look for and where to look. In the LTTE's case, such airborne
ELINT/SIGINT sorties are totally worthless. A far more pragmatic approach will
be to install such SIGINT/ELINT mission sensors on board both the Indian Navy
and Coast Guard Do-229-201s that are tasked with flying routine surveillance
sorties adjacent to the airspace of northern Sri Lanka, and installing similar
hardware on board the Coast Guard vessels patrolling the seas off Rameshwaram
and Jaffna.
|