"..It has been reported 
	that you have publicly participated in LTTE activities by personally and 
	knowingly attending and speaking at pro-LTTE events such as PongoThamil in 
	Madrid and London. In addition, you have publicly announced your support for 
	B. Nadesan. As a prominent member of a political party that has historically 
	and consistently shown support for the LTTE we can conclude that your 
	actions constitute membership in the LTTE..." 
	
	Canadian High Commissioner's Letter to Dr Vickramabahu 
	Karunarathne, 18 September 2008 
	"Thank you for your letter dated 18 Sep 
	2008, which I found quite amusing. Firstly, let me correct some absolute 
	untruths included in your letter. I have never been to Spain; and I could 
	not attend Pongu Thamil meeting in London as I got the British visa after 
	the event..". 
	
	Dr Vickramabahu Karunarathne's Response to Canadian High 
	Commission 
	
	 
	
	Canadian High Commissioner's Letter to Dr Vickramabahu Karunarathne, 18 
	September 2008 
	
	 
	
	Dr Vickramabahu Karunarathne's Response to Canadian High Commission 
 
			
			Comment by 
			
			
			tamilnation.org 
			The sequential logic of the Canadian High Commission in 
			Colombo beggars belief.  
			
			
			That 
			Mr.Karunaratne has never been to Spain and did not attend the Pongu 
			Thamil event in London is not the question. That the
			Canadian High Commission's  
			allegation that Mr.Karunaratne had 'personally and knowingly' 
			attended these events was an allegation made with a reckless 
			disregard to truth is also not the question. 
			 
			Again the question 
			is not whether Mr.Karunaratne is right when he says that 'his party 
			is a (Marxist) socialist party whilst the LTTE is a Tamil 
			nationalist bourgeois party' or whether 
			Benedict Anderson  was right 
			when he pointed out many years ago -  
			
				"..Nationalism has proved an 
				uncomfortable anomaly for Marxist theory and precisely for that 
				reason, has been largely elided, rather than confronted. How 
				else to account for the use, for over a century of the concept 
				of the 'national bourgeoisie' without any serious attempt to 
				justify theoretically the relevance of the adjective? Why is 
				this segmentation of the bourgeoisie - a world class in so far 
				as it is defined in terms of the relations of productions - 
				theoretically significant? ... A nation is an imagined political 
				community... It is imagined as a community, because 
				regardless of the actual inequality and exploitation that may 
				prevail in each, the nation is always conceived as a deep 
				horizontal comradeship. 
				Ultimately, it is this fraternity that makes it possible, over 
				the past two centuries, for so many millions of people, not so 
				much to kill, as willingly to die for such limited imaginings." 
				Benedict Anderson: Imagined Communities - Reflections on the 
				Origin and Spread of Nationalism, 1991 
				quoted in What is a 
				Nation - Nadesan Satyendra 
			 
			The question is 
			also not whether Mr.Karunaratne is right when he says that the  
			"LTTE uses the method of terror in the course of the struggle" or 
			whether UN 
			Special Rapporteur, Kalliopi K. Koufa was right when he declared 
			in 2004 - 
			
				"...The most 
				problematic issue relating to terrorism and armed conflict is 
				distinguishing terrorists from lawful combatants, both in terms 
				of combatants in legitimate struggles for self-determination and 
				those involved in civil wars or non-international armed 
				conflicts." 
				
				Terrorism and Human Rights  Final Report of the Special 
				Rapporteur, Kalliopi K. Koufa,  25 June 2004 
				"Throwing a 
				bomb is bad, 
				
				Dropping a bomb is good; Terror, no need to add, 
				Depends on who's wearing the hood." 
				 R.Woddis 'Ethics for Everyman'  quoted by
				Igor Primoratz 
				in State Terrorism & Counter Terrorism 
			 
			The real issues lie 
			elsewhere. The real issue is whether 'public participation' in 
			events such as 
			Pongu Thamil 
			constitutes evidence of membership of  the LTTE. The real issue 
			is whether support for the struggle of the people of Tamil Eelam to 
			free themselves from alien Sinhala rule constitutes evidence of 
			membership of the LTTE. 
			
			
			The fact is that 
			if Mr.Karunaratne had attended
			
			the Pongu Thamil ('pro LTTE') event in London he would have been 
			in good company. 
			
		
		  
			
			
			 If 
			Mr.Karunaratne had attended
			
			the Pongu Thamil ('pro LTTE') event in London he would have been 
			in the company of more than 30,000 supporters of the Tamil struggle 
			for justice. - and he would have been in the company of  
			
			Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrats Foreign Affairs 
			spokesman,
			Andrew 
			Pelling MP (Conservative) 
			
			Virendra Sharma MP 
			(Labour),
			
			Mike Griffiths MP 
			(Labour),  
			Siobhan McDonnagh, Labour MP, Baroness Sarah Luxford MEP 
			(Liberal Democrats) and
			Dawn Butler 
			MP
						(Labour).  
			Again, it appears that 
			Mr.Karunaratne did send a message to the Pongu Thamil event in 
			London. And here he was in the distinguished company of  Tony 
			Benn MP (Labour), Robert Evans MEP (Labour), Stephen Hammond MP 
			(Conservatives), Simon Hughes MP (Liberal Democrats), Susan Kramer 
			MP (Liberal Democrats), Joan Ryan MP (Labour) and Roy Padayachie 
			(South Africa�s Deputy Minister of Communications) who also sent 
			messages. 
			The Canadian High Commission in 
			Colombo offends reason and insults intelligence when it asserts that 
			participation in 
			Pongu 
			Thamil events 
			such as those in London on 12 July 2008, constitutes evidence of 
			membership of the LTTE. 
			Again it appears that in the 
			eyes of the Canadian High Commission 'public support' for 
			Mr.B.Nadesan, Head of the Political Wing of the LTTE constitutes 
			evidence of  Mr.Karunaratne's membership of the LTTE! 
			Presumably public support for US President Bush would in the eyes of 
			the Canadian High Commision constitute evidence of the supporter's 
			membership of the Republican Party.  
			Furthermore, in the eyes of the 
			Canadian High Commission,  the fact that  Mr.Karunaratne 
			has defended
			
			the right of self determination of the Tamil people, constitutes 
			evidence of his membership of the LTTE - presumbly because it is a 
			right which the LTTE has also defended.
			 
			The sequential logic of the 
			Canadian High Commission is no different to the sequential logic of 
			the murderous regime of President Mahinda Rajapakse - a murderous 
			regime in whose eyes every Tamil who is committed to the vision of 
			an independent Tamil Eelam that was articulated by the Gandhian 
			Tamil leader S.J.V.Chelvanayagam in 1975 is a member of the LTTE and 
			therefore  must  be hunted down and killed. The Canadian 
			High Commission appears to have extended this principle to even 
			those Sinhalese who may agree with that which the
			
			Gandhian Tamil leader S.J.V.Chelvanayagam said in 1975 - 
			 
			
				"Throughout the ages the Sinhalese and Tamils 
				in the country lived as distinct sovereign people till they were 
				brought under foreign domination. It should be remembered that 
				the Tamils were in the vanguard of the struggle for independence 
				in the full confidence that they also will regain their freedom. 
				
				We have for the last 25 years made every effort to secure our 
				political rights on the basis of equality with the Sinhalese in 
				a united Ceylon."  
				"It is a regrettable fact that successive 
				Sinhalese governments have used the power that flows from 
				independence 
				to deny 
				us our fundamental rights and reduce us to the position of a 
				subject people. These governments have been able to do so 
				only by using against the Tamils the sovereignty common to the 
				Sinhalese and the Tamils."  
				"I wish to announce to my people and to the 
				country that I consider the verdict at this election as a 
				mandate that the 
				
				Tamil Eelam nation should exercise the sovereignty already 
				vested in the Tamil people and become free."
  				 
			 
			Mr.Karunaratne says that he was amused at the 
			Canadian High Commission's letter. We ourselves are not amused. We 
			are angry. We are angry that support for the goals of an 
			organisation leads the Canadian High Commission to conclude that the 
			supporter is a member of that organisation. We are angry at the 
			refusal of the Canadian High Commission to recognise that support 
			for the goals of an organisation is not support for all the methods 
			that an organisation may employ. We are angry at the refusal of the 
			Canadian High Commission to recognise that in any case, even 
			support for an organisation,  is not membership 
			of that organisation -  and that this is more so in the case of 
			an organisation which restricts its members to those wearing a 
			cyanide capsule and to those who have committed their lives to the 
			struggle. We are angry at the brazen denial of reason by a 
			representative of a country  which often holds itself out as 
			the defender of fundamental freedoms. And, yes, sometimes, it is  
			right to be angry. 
			
				நெஞ்சு 
				பொறுக்குதில்லையே - இந்த 
				நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால் - 
				
				Subramaniya  Bharathy 
			 
			 |