On the 1st of June 2006, I had the privilege to read
            a poem written by Arugan from Italy: Karpu enpathu nambikkai. It is Arugan's
            poem which acted as catalyst to writing this piece.
            Some long while ago, when I was working for my first
            degree, I wrote an essay on Inculturation. The
            professor who marked the paper had the good sense to
            mark it "A". Bless his heart! However, this upper crust
            American, wrote in red ink in the margins, with his
            indecipherable scribble. 'Had you not discussed the
            archaic concept of Karpoo I would have given you
            A*'
            
            Westerners except in exceptional cases always seem to
            miss the point in understanding alien and ancient
            cultures. I'll say it again there are exceptions a
            plenty. This is a considered opinion. Unwittingly
            perhaps they seem to have not over come the 'civilising
            concept'. There is an element of sub-conscious feeling
            of superiority. Except a few avant-garde intellectuals,
            most western academicians seem to think, any thing
            foreign has to be redeemed from its primitive
            ignorance. Hence there is a sense of false altruistic
            propulsion to emancipate the under-developed souls from
            oppression. Of course, in every culture - whether
            Western or Eastern there are both good and bad. But it
            is utterly ludicrous or blatant arrogance for some one
            to think, let alone suggest, that the Tamils of Eelam -
            an ancient stock of people, should be emancipated from
            the concept of Karpu.
            
            Karpu is a core value of the Tamil culture. Any good
            society will promote freedom and liberty. But in the
            name of freedom, one should not give way to license.
            Licentious living has produced far greater evil. Most
            ancient Eastern religions including Christianity [by
            the way it is not a Western religion] advance the
            concept of human freedom and responsibility. No
            religion in its right mind, promotes a permissive
            society nor a repressive society. None should
            misinterpret as if I'm hinting to promote illiberal
            restrictions on personal freedom.
            
            I have been in familial contact with Scandinavia and
            its splendid people since 1972. I was told by
            Westerners [both Europeans and North Americans] that
            Sweden and its adjoining countries have permissive
            societies. I felt disgusted when I learnt that in
            Denmark even paedophiles could run their own website in
            the name of liberty and free-speech. I cannot comment
            further because only a sick mind would engage in such
            atrocity. It is indeed laughable when academicians with
            their own cultural-glasses, bias, vested-interests and
            in-bread prejudices try to judge and interpret ancient
            cultures. If some one were to say casteism, dowry
            system, oppression of weaker sections of society,
            child-labour to name only a few - that all these are
            oppressive and must be abolished. Most decent Tamils
            would say. Yes, of course yes! Karpu - modesty,
            chastity, loyalty, beauty, godliness, self-control,
            virginity in terms of spirituality etc etc ─
            these qualities are oppressive? One could be childish
            or churlish in advancing such an ill-conceived
            position.
            
            The Tamils want a free society but not a permissive
            society.
            
            In my recent cursory readings I found an informative
            paper written by a Sweden-based academician who has
            produced some good materials regarding Tamil struggle.
            I shall refer to that paper later but first a word
            about the Tamil leader Mr Prabaharan.
            
            As a young person I was drawn by the liberation
            movement and the idea of Tamil Eelam. I needed a longer
            period however, in fact some considerable years, to
            watch and perceive the character of Prabaharan by
            reading his actions. He was undoubtedly an indomitable
            spirit. Each time I read about the man in the formative
            days of the struggle, I would secretly weep there was a
            blood-pull of overwhelming affection towards him. I
            concealed my emotions, as one would, within me: I knew
            instinctively in my spirit, that he is living an
            underground, fugitive life in order to free his people
            tomorrow.
            
            I disciplined my self to not get hooked to the myths
            and positive and negative spin in circulation about the
            man. After Tantai Chelva's demise I refused
            to consider any one to be my Talaivar. Post-Chelva it
            was evident, most front men were tongue-twisting
            lawyers. Talaivar is a serious word, not to be used too
            hastily on any person, at least that is what I was
            brought up to believe. It speaks of commitment and
            loyalty - "Karpu". One is not expected to "prostitute"
            their principles or values. Being part of a
            sycophantic-lot was not my cup of tea. I knew the idea
            of Eelam was much bigger than any one person. Until
            2004 I did not feel comfortable within me to call
            Prabaharan with the title "Talaivar" while of course
            being an adherent of the movement. That connection was
            established in the Vanni soil.
            
            Crisis reveals character. T Sabaratnam's excellent series on
            Prabaharan reveals the "Talaivar" -
            
              "...Ramachandran told Pirapaharan their
              predicament when they met in Chennai. "Is it a big
              problem?" Ramachandran asked Pirapaharan. Pirapaharan
              was furious. He said, "For you people who live in
              London it is not a major problem. Here, in our
              society, it is a serious problem. Who will permit
              their daughters to join a movement in which leaders
              molest their cadres?" Kandiah Urmila Devi, Urmila in
              brief, was LTTE's first woman cadre. She was active
              in the Colombo branch of the Tamil Youth Forum and
              had worked closely with Uma. She was admitted into
              the LTTE on the recommendation of Uma. Ramachandran,
              whom I met many years later, said he had no answer to
              Pirapaharan's query. He returned to London..."
            
            Most Tamils know the history of the struggle. To the
            Western mind-set or even to some easterners of loose
            inclinations, moral lapse could be not a big deal,
            after all. "Is it a problem?" It depends from where you
            are viewing. Whether you are willing to exclude
            morality and values while, stretching the idea of
            secularism to the extreme breaking-limit. It is the
            result of selfish materialistic extension of an idea by
            the depletion of spirit and spirituality. It is like a
            lifeless corpse a spiritless soul. Tragedy that.
            
            Karpu is wider in its semantic field and the
            overarching meaning is not strictly sexual. For rape
            the Tamil word that was employed was Karpu-alippu
            {destruction of Karpu} but the current word in usage is
            more closely translated to the concept of Karpu:
            Paliyal Val-Uravu.
            
            One had been violently forced into having sex by
            coercive force [palathkaram, vanmurai]. In other words,
            the emphasis is placed on violation and violence. This
            is the plight of the Tamil virgins in the hands of
            Cingala forces. A molested woman or man whether a
            virgin or other wise (unmarried or otherwise) was
            sexually pure in spirit. Karpu is much more than a
            biological damage and violent intrusion. A wife could
            be raped by a husband! In essence, It speaks of the
            spirit, sould and body of a whole person - not just
            constricting to a physical act. When a uravu - a
            relationship is forced upon it is a rape. One should
            not underestimate the trauma. That is the purity, and
            punitham of Karpu.
            
            As the Lord Jesus pointed out, the moral breach -
            adultery first happens in one's eye of lust. In Tamil
            that is called apacam. This is an opposite of pacam and
            anpu. One reads in the Gospel, when a woman was caught
            in the act of adultery the men brought her to Jesus and
            they wanted her to be stoned to death in front of him.
            The crowd wanted to see Jesus' reaction. He said, a man
            in the crowd who does not have sin let him throw the
            first stone. None did. This speaks eloquently about
            crowd-contagion. The trigger is in the "first-stone"
            This is what occurs in gang rapes. But it does not
            condone the sin of adultery. I often tend to ask why
            the crowd didn't bring the man who was caught
            red-handed also to be stoned. [Jesus did not aprove of
            stoning] Aha! A societal breach!
            
            I now turn to the paper that I mentioned earlier. It is
            entitled: The Martial Feminism of Atel Palacinkam.
            Herein below, I quote from it at length in order for
            the reader to get the drift:
            
              "...The word Karpu, however, is not mentioned, nor
              is the concept in Atel Palacinkam'a books. It does
              not appear at all. She has adopted, it seems, a
              discrete, traditional and predictable silence on
              these matters. One does not simply talk about Karpu.
              Indeed, a direct attack on Karpu would have been
              counter-productive because it would have been an
              attack on a core value of traditional Tamil culture
              supported by both men and women. Karpu is an ultimate
              value for female behaviour. Besides Karpu need not
              necessarily be attacked, because the suppression of
              women is clearly observable in other terms, because
              the suppression of women is clearly observable in
              other terms, in spite of the removal of some
              discriminatory restrictions like those education for
              females. A refutation of the concept of Karpu would,
              however, have shown the author's historical awareness
              of values about female segregation in Yalppanam that
              is, an awareness of the difficulty of eliminating
              this concept..."(Schalk: Women fighters of the LTTE.
              The Martial Feminism of Atel Palacinkam. South Asia
              Research, Vol.14, No.2, autumn 1994, p 178)
            
            Is Schalk discussing here of a Taliban
            ruled Afghanistan or the Yalppanam we love and know
            from our childhood? Sadly, I cannot recognize Yalpanam
            - our cultural capital, in his writing at all. In my
            discussion with Tamilini- LTTE Women's politicalwing
            leader, she emphatically said that there is still room
            for emancipation for Tamil women. There is no argument
            in this regard. Yalpannam society is a highly religious
            and conservative society but that is also a society yet
            which has produced thousands of emancipated and
            educated women even before pre-colonial period. These
            highly intelligent and articulate women, during or
            post-colonial times up to now have never ever voiced
            that what the Tamils urgently require is Western-type
            feminism. Far from it, our emancipatory concepts will
            be unique to our own context, confirmed Tamilini. The
            emphasis was that the Tamils are not willing to accept
            importation of novel ideas for the sake of it. The text
            will have to fit the context or else it will be just a
            pretext.
            
            Can any Jaffna wo/man [run! ask your grand mothers]
            remotely identify women segregation? In my old age I am
            yet to come across a Tamil who has experienced
            segregation because of gender! If Schalk challenges
            caste segregation and discrimination in Jaffna - then
            the answer is, an overwhelming Yes. But when did Jaffna
            segregate in terms of gender? Are women experiencing
            "restrictions in education" in Jaffna? What a
            preposterous idea!
            
            Palacinkam's political perceptions have caused her to
            act wisely in silence. It seems Schalk and Palacinkam
            have viewed Karpu as a subversive tool of oppression.
            The latter has been extremely cautious and sensible not
            to impose one's view on a highly-civilized people of
            mature culture. I have known many young Tamil
            expatriate professional gentlemen in the West who have
            returned to Eelam with the view to marrying young girls
            who have gone through paliyal val-uravu during the IPKF
            days or in the hands of Cingalavan forces. Of course,
            these noble Tamils do not go around giving interviews
            to write research papers! I have personally witnessed
            numerous such weddings. It never entered the minds of
            these noble men that their wives had no Karpu. What an
            ill-mannered suggestion is that?
            
            If karpu is suppression and segregation then is
            permissiveness the answer? I do have to sadly admit in
            shame that in recent years I have dealt with some cases
            in which some crooked Tamil youngsters from Western
            countries have gone to Eelam and married young girls
            with fat dowries and returned to the West and
            completely forgotten about their wives! But no culture
            is immune to such small men. Schalk further comments in
            the above mentioned paper thus:
            
              "Even though she does not mention it, Palacinkam
              implicitly rejects the ideal of Karpu by condemning
              some of its social expressions and implications. The
              value is connected with the social marginalisation of
              raped women and widows, and with the daily
              ideological control of men over women. The concept of
              Karpu is also connected with the gender specific and
              sex-connected concept of female power that is
              generated by the exercise of Karpu. All these
              expressions and implications, to which we must also
              add former practice of widow burning, are condemned
              by her. She does not, however, show that she is aware
              that all have their base in the sophisticated and
              manipulative concept of Karpu."
            
            I doubt Schalk or Palacinkam are really being
            serious about what they are talking about. Either both
            have misunderstood each other or both trying to
            liberate the Tamil women from a wrongly perceived
            concept.
            
            Having said that, one must agree without singling out
            Tamil culture Karpu can be gender specific. The
            emancipation of women is still being fought for in the
            West. By no means is it complete or final. Multitude of
            White men goes to Sri Lanka with full of lust and
            perversion knowing that only a mere pittance could buy
            him a virgin to be exploited and abused. Paedophiles of
            the West expose destitute Sri Lankan children to
            frightful indecency. Such fun loving sex-tourists might
            have to think twice if they are allowed to engage in
            such despicable pursuits in Eelam. Why? Eelam has high
            moral standards. Recent developments in the East Eelam
            with regard to Paliyal val-uravu by white NGO personnel
            on fellow local workers and the production of 'Blue
            movies' became a big issue, and rightly so. Do we
            interpret that as suppression? Can any one point to
            a Tamil Tiger ever raping a Cingala woman?
            The concept of Karpu is not to be talked about
            loosely because that is not considered a decent thing.
            These are culturally sensitive matters. Tamils are a
            very discreet people. Hence it should not be
            interpreted as sign of oppression. It is hilarious
            should some one compare widow burning [Sati] with
            Karpu. The British Missionaries helped to abolish or
            out law widow burning in 1829 in India and the Tamils
            have had no qualms about it. Widow burning is by no
            means unique to the Sub-continent. It is believed that
            it was the Scythians who brought with them this custom
            to India. It was practised by Egyptians, Greeks, Goths
            and others. Not all Hindu communities in India
            practised it.
            
            This is the unfortunate result when foreign researchers
            with their own pre-conceived misperceptions and biased
            cultural glasses find them selves meddling in other
            people's cultures. Many ancient original peoples in the
            world faced and still do face such intrusive abuse. The
            missionaries of old in spite of their many sacrificial
            and great deeds failed miserably to understand deeply
            spiritual concepts of indigenous cultures. The Colonial
            frame of mind was filled with imperialistic modes of
            understanding and the mercantile nature of the colonial
            Christianity which brought with it the notion of racial
            superiority and the condescending impulses to act as
            "saviours" of the native population. Things have been
            glossed over in a politically correct world but the
            changing of attitudes have been by and large
            superficial. Hence there is an enormous risk of such
            fallacies being repeated in theory and practice in the
            name of flimsy emancipation of academicians.
            
            Schalk has written many informative papers. He has
            insights in to both Tamil and Cinhala cultures. He has
            to be appreciated for his contribution in regard to the
            struggle from Cinhala hegemony. Nonetheless, the
            serious mis-understanding and the heretical exposition
            of Schalk is a vain attempt to promote a dilapidated
            view on the concept of Karpu. It must be said, it is
            not at all convincing. On a positive note however,
            perhaps his intentions are good, but his liberative
            thrust is alarmingly misplaced. The arguments do not
            seem to hold any water.
            
            I look forward to reading his other papers in hand. One
            would think, it will prove to be different. Obviously.
            In conclusion I quote below in sentamil, excerpts from
            Arugan's Karpu:
            
              
                அதாவது
                கற்பு
                என்பது
                நம்பிக்கை.
                
                கணவன்
                மனைவியிடத்தில்
                வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                தந்தை
                மகளிடத்தில்வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                தாய்
                மகனிடத்தில்
                வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                நண்பன்
                தன்
                நண்பனிடம்
                வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                காதலன்
                காதலியிடம்
                வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                காதலி
                காதலனிடம்
                வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                தொண்டர்கள்
                தலைவனிடத்தில்
                வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                அரசன்
                மக்களிடம்
                வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                மக்கள்
                இறைவனிடம்
                வைக்கும்
                நம்பிக்கை
                கற்பு.
                …
                இப்படிச்சொல்லிக்கொண்டே
                போகலாம்…
                
                இந்த
                நம்பிக்கைக்கு
                எப்போது
                பங்கம்
                வருகிறதோ
                அப்போது
                கற்பு
                அங்கே
                அழிக்கப்படுகிறது;
                
                இதில்
                ஆண் என்ன
                பெண்
                என்ன ?