INDIA MUST STOP REPRESSION OF
TAMILS
- N. SANMUGATHASAN
- 15 October 1987, Tamil Times
The kaleidescope o f Sri Lankan history has
been changing so fast
in the past few weeks, that it is difficult to
keep a balanced point
of view, even from a distance.
The Peace Accord
First came the Peace Accord at the end of July
when President Jayewardene reversed himself on
several important positions which he had hitherto
held. The man who was one of three State
Councillors who opposed S. W. R. D.
Bandaranaike's resolution, in the second State
Council in 1944, calling for the replacement of
English as the official language by both Sinhala
and Tamil and instead demanded Sinhala Only; the
man who had led the March to Kandy in opposition
to the Bandaranaike - Chelvanayagam Pact and was
instrumental in getting it abrogated, now signed
an agreement to make Tamil and English as
official languages along with Sinhala.
The man who was dead opposed to the merger of
the Northern and Eastern Provinces now signs an
agreement for their merger, even though subject
to a referendum in 1988.
Peacekeepers become Oppressors
But the most spectacular development was the
reversal of the role of the Indian Peacekeeping
Force which had been greeted by the Tamils with
garlands, hugs and kisses as saviours of the
Tamils from Sinhala brutality and their changing
into oppressors - even more brutal than the
Sinhala army.
It is difficult to find a reason for this base
treachery. One can come to terms with an enemy.
But it is difficult to deal with a friend who has
become an enemy. After all India had pretended to
be a supporter of the Tamil cause. It had allowed
the Tamil militants to virtually use Tamil Nadu
as their base. It had trained and armed them.
Now, it has turned its guns against the very
people who had looked upon it as a saviour.
The Political Game of Rajiv & JR
The explanation for this Indian action, apart
from the aim of bringing Sri Lanka under its
control, lies in the fact that the interests of
Rajiv Gandhi, no less than those of J. R.
Jayewardene, demand that the revolution - any
movement of the Tamils - be not allowed to
succeed lest it set a 'bad' example. That is also
the reason why the Super-Powers rushed in to
support the Accord. All reactionary forces are
eager to douse the flames of revolution lest the
'injection' spread to other countries in the
region.
That, initially, India had supported the Tamil
cause is undoubted and cannot be denied. But it
would seem that it gave support to the Tamil
militants with the aim of controlling and
manipulating them against the Sri Lankan
government.
Unfortunately for them, the Tamil Tigers did
not prove pliable instruments. So they had to be
suppressed!
That innocent Tamils caught in between were
going to suffer does not seem to have entered the
calculations of the Indians. India's image in the
world stands besmirched. From pretending to be a
supporter of liberation movements it has
transformed itself into an oppressor of the Tamil
national movement. Its troops are fighting on
foreign soil and killing people in one of its
important states.
The Tamil militant groups cannot be absolved
of all blame for precipitating this situation.
Quite apart from the question of whether better
tactics could have prevented Indian military
intervention, their strategy of putting all their
eggs in one basket, of relying too heavily on
Indian support, was hound to lead to disastrous
results.
Here is an important lesson that all
liberation movements must learn. They must not
place exclusive reliance on foreign sources of
support. They should have more faith in
self-reliance. It is better to develop slowly
over a long period than be inflated into a big
force with foreign support. Because, if for any
reason the foreign support is withdrawn, the
movement will fall flat on its face. Whereas, if
it had depended on self-reliance, it would be
unshakable.
The blame for the present situation must also
be shared by the progressive and left movement in
Sri Lanka. It is the fact that the left movement
betrayed the correct international principles it
had once championed and fell into the mire of
parliamentary opportunism and thereby alienated
themselves from the Tamils that has been
responsible for a good part of the mess we are
in.
Parliamentary Democracy unsuited for a
multi-racial society
In a multi-racial, multi-linguistic society,
parliamentary democracy does not work. If they
want to come to power through parliament, all
parliamentary parties must seek to woo the
majority and ignore the minority. They support
not what is right but what would bring them to
power with majority support. That is why it is
correct to say that the Donoughmore constitution
which gave us adult franchise and territorial
presentation contained within it the seeds of
communal dissension.
The extent of the degeneration of the left
movement can be seen from the fact that the
bombing of Jaffna brought forth no discernible
protest in the south. When the Anthony Eden
government bombed the Suez Canal in 1956, the
British Labour Party organised huge
demonstrations in London. When Israel invaded
Lebanon in 1982, there were demonstrations
against it in Jerusalem. But, when the Sinhala
air force bombed Jaffna, there was not even a
whimper of a protest from the left parties in the
south.
The left movement - except for small groups -
failed to take up a principled, internationalist
stand on the Tamil problem because it did not
want to alienate itself from the Sinhala
majority. The result was that it could not fight
back the Communalism unleashed not only by the
government but also by the SLFP and the JVP. It
was this tragedy (to which the bourgeois
leadership of the Tamils also contributed by
their refusal to see the Sinhala left as an ally)
that pushed the Tamils to look for allies and
friends abroad in India, rather than draw closer
to their natural allies in the left movement. It
was tragic for both sides.
Unity of Progressive forces essential
Where do we go from here? I believe that the
future lies in the unity of the progressive and
revolutionary forces among both the Sinhalese and
the Tamils. It is true that, at the moment, the
signs are not propitious and the Tamils have a
right to despair of any such hope. But, we must
have faith and work perseveringly for such a
unity.
Such unity must be built on the basis of the
recognition of the right of self-determination of
the Tamils. But, how the right of
self-determination is to be exercised and in what
form is a matter that can be discussed. The
acceptance of the right of self-determination for
the Tamils does not necessarily mean that they
must separate. Lenin once said that the right of
divorce does not mean that all married couples
must divorce. It depended on the
circumstances.
Solution to Ethnic Problem
In the interests of the future building of
socialism in Sri Lanka for which the unity of the
revolutionary forces of the Sinhalese and the
Tamils is an absolute pre-requisite, we have a
right to ask the Tamil people to
exercise the right of self-determination not
in the form of a separate state but in the form
of a federal state or full regional autonomy for
the Tamil-speaking Northern and Eastern
Provinces. By regional autonomy is meant full
powers for the regional unit over all subjects,
except such central subjects' as Defence,
Finance, External Affairs, etc. It must include
power over internal security i.e. the police,
land and land settlement, i.e. colonisation.
While on the matter of a solution I must point
out that a solution must he found to the vexed
problem of colonisation. Colonisation is
intimately connected to the question of
nationhood. Without territory no people can
develop as a nation. The claim of the Tamils to
be a nation depends on the fact that they have
occupied a contiguous territory in the North and
Lot of Sri Lanka for a long period of time. cut
them off from this territory and they will cease
to be a nation.
That is why, starting with a D.S. Senanayake,
all Shillala leaders have tried through
state-aided colonisation schemes to colonise the
Tamil areas with Sinhalese peasants. The
diabolical aim was to convert a Tamil majority
province into Sinhala majority province by
altering the ethnic ratio. That is how the
proportion of Sinhalese lip big in the Eastern
Province rose from only 8% at the end of the
second world war to its position of about 25%
The Tamil problem cannot be resolved without
solving the problem of land and colonisation.
Unfortunately, the Accord does not mention a word
about this subject. The result was that the
Jayawardene government hastened to take steps to
intensify colonisation of the Eastern Province
with Sinhalese peasants so that it could get a
favourable result in the referendum next year
which is to decide whether the merger was to
continue or not. Equally, some sections of the
Tamil militants tried to frighten the Sinhalese
into leaving the Eastern Province. It was a fight
for land.
The Tamils have no objection to individual
Sinhalese buying land in Tamil areas and living
there peacefully. What they object to is
state-aided colonisation schemes under which
large numbers of Sinhalese are transported to
Tamil areas and settled as colonists. Unless this
problem is solved, there cannot he any settlement
of the Tamil problem.
The Tamil militants have courageously resisted
the Sinhala armed forces for nearly four years.
Now they are faced with a more powerful and a
more brutal enemy. I applaud their courage in
taking on such a powerful enemy. But they will
need more than courage. They must follow correct
tactics. They must win the sympathy of the world
by desisting from unnecessary violence,
particularly against innocent people - be they
Sinhalese or Tamils. They must so behave that the
world will demand that the Indian troops should
stop repressing the Tamils.
|