Murdered, missing, imprisoned in camps...The guns may be 
					silent in Sri Lanka for the first time in 26 years, but the 
					price of peace for the innocent Tamils caught up in the 
					fighting could not be higher ... Dan McDougall travels from 
					the Tamils' UK protest in Parliament Square to the killing 
					fields of Sri Lanka
				
				A foul-smelling monsoon closes in from the north, carrying 
				dark clouds of ash from the Hindu funeral pyres burning along 
				the "Highway for Peace and Unity". At the roadside, translucent 
				glasswing butterflies flutter and dance in the charred iron 
				shell of an old British Leyland bus, its undercarriage ripped 
				apart and shredded like paper by a Claymore landmine. 
				
				Little more than a cratered strip of asphalt running 100 miles 
				due north from the ancient city of Anuradhapura to Jaffna, the 
				road's grandiose Marxist title is typically deceptive: today it 
				bisects a dramatically transformed landscape - the broken heart 
				of Sri Lanka's former Tamil Tiger country, a battle-scarred 
				route lined with thousands of shallow graves, unexploded 
				landmines and the rotting stumps of palmyra trees blackened by 
				the rain. 
				
				Here, sheltering from the darkening skies at a remote army 
				checkpoint, a group of weary teenage soldiers gather around an 
				old Russian television impassively watching the capital, 
				Colombo, celebrate the end of the war. 
				
				Dressed in messianic white, the Sri Lankan president, Mahinda 
				Rajapaksa, is walking through the streets of the capital as 
				followers shower him with pink flower petals. At each street 
				corner he is offered traditional kiribath (milk rice) and kavung 
				(oil cakes). Crudely dubbed over the footage, hastily assembled 
				songs declare "Our King Rajapaksa", wishing him "Ayubowewa" - a 
				long life. 
				
				"We won the war, we won, OK!" shouts an army NCO in coarse 
				Sinhalese, breaking the silence and ordering the young soldiers 
				on to a personnel carrier heading north. "Now get back to work."
				
				
				At their journey's end, no more than 30 miles north along the 
				single-track road, the conscripts will be brutally confronted 
				with more than a quarter of a million personal hells - Tamil 
				refugees who have fled the Sri Lankan civil war in recent days 
				and weeks, as the secessionist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam 
				(LTTE) fought and lost a brutal endgame for a separate Tamil 
				state in the country's northeast. Malnourished and traumatised, 
				the displaced stare out from behind the barbed wire of 
				internment camps erected by the Sri Lankan government. 
				
				Elderly grandmothers, infants, pregnant women, wounded fathers, 
				their faces as twisted and contorted as the razorwire that 
				imprisons them, trapped in a state of incarceration the Colombo 
				authorities claim is necessary for the refugees' own "safety". 
				Further into the bush are the field hospitals, hidden from the 
				eyes of the world yet overflowing with civilian victims of the 
				war. Beyond the medical camps, according to eyewitnesses, are 
				thousands of freshly dug graves. Six thousand miles away in 
				London, a growing body of UK-based campaigners are calling it 
				quite simply "The War Without Witness".
				
				"The British government doesn't give a fuck about Sri Lanka, 
				they just don't give a fuck, nobody here does." The British 
				Tamil student's anger peaks as he is marched across Parliament 
				Square in central London by his girlfriend, his fists, his 
				entire body shaking with grief and loss as he waves a photograph 
				of a bloodied child, much of her stomach missing. "Is it a 
				relative?" I ask. Nobody seems to know. In his fury the young 
				man lets go of the deathly image, and is forced to chase it down 
				in the breeze. 
				
				Another Tamil woman, middle-aged, an NHS nurse in faux ruby 
				earrings, holds up a photocopied print of her missing sister for 
				the photographer, pauses, and breaks down, lost in chest-racking 
				sobs. Nobody consoles her. Everyone stands back. Blinking in the 
				sunshine, the others are drowning in their own private grief. 
				Most of them wait patiently, portraits of their loved ones in 
				their hands, their own stories of horror at the forefront of 
				their minds. Behind them a crowd is gathering, their number is 
				growing. To reach our impromptu studio, each has passed by a 
				wooden hut erected in the heart of the square where hundreds of 
				passport photographs of the dead and the missing have been 
				posted. Some are gory. Bodies decapitated, dead eyes staring 
				out. Beneath each photograph are contact numbers for concerned 
				relatives.
				
				It had started as a simple idea in the dreary hotel room in 
				Colombo that I was sharing with photographer Robin Hammond. As 
				the lights of the old port twinkled below and Sri Lanka heralded 
				a new beginning, I read an Amnesty report that ranked Sri Lanka 
				second in terms of numbers seeking asylum in the UK. Tamils in 
				Britain, largely thanks to a mass exodus in the 1980s, now 
				number approximately 200,000, mostly in south and west London.
				
				
				So I sent an email home, asking a few London-based Tamils I knew 
				had been affected by the war if they would pose for portraits 
				when we returned. The replies, within 24 hours, were staggering. 
				"We have 50 and can get you 500 more," said one source. "More 
				can come at short notice," said another campaigner. "How many do 
				you need? We have thousands of photographs, missing, dead, 
				children, grandmothers, this is a genocide, what do you expect?"
				
				I shouldn't have been surprised. An organised and galvanised 
				diaspora, who haven't slept in two months, as the battle to end 
				all battles raged on the island that bore them - all of the UK's 
				Tamils have been affected by the war. 
				
				While the expenses scandal has gripped British political life in 
				recent weeks, Britain's Tamils have taken over Parliament 
				Square. Over a month ago, one of the protestors, Prarameswaran 
				Subramaniam, lay down on a fetid mattress opposite parliament 
				and went on hunger strike. His ultimatum was simple: 
				
				"I will stay here until either my body can continue no longer or 
				the British government persuades the Sri Lankan government to 
				stop shelling my people," he said. Subramaniam began his protest 
				at the end of April after discovering that his mother and 
				several siblings had been killed in Sri Lankan military attacks. 
				He is now recovering in hospital.
				
				Other UK-based Tamils threatened to throw themselves off the top 
				of Big Ben or drown themselves in the Thames; two actually made 
				it into the water but were rescued by a police boat patrol. In 
				response to the Tamil takeover of Parliament Square, Westminster 
				council complained about their numbers and moved to protect the 
				grass, which they claimed was going through an "urgent 
				reseeding". The Times accused the Tamils of turning Parliament 
				Square into a "shanty town", a banner headline that particularly 
				irked the Tamil diaspora - professors, doctors, school teachers, 
				engineers and architects among their number. 
				
				In the Commons, the Speaker of the House, Michael Martin, 
				condemned the actions of some Tamil protesters, who, he claimed, 
				put young children "in the way" of police officers. Conservative 
				MP Gerald Howarth raised a point of order to ask what powers the 
				Speaker had to order the Metropolitan Police to secure "free 
				access to Parliament" for MPs. He said: "It is completely 
				outrageous that members of this House have been subjected to 
				this inconvenience, that the people of London have been 
				subjected to this inconvenience. The situation in Sri Lanka is 
				nothing to do with this House. Surely law and order has broken 
				down outside the Houses of Parliament." Not surprisingly, 
				Howarth's stance provoked fury among the new occupants of 
				Parliament Square. 
				
				As he unfurled a peace banner in Parliament Square, Tamil 
				campaigner Prakesh Mano, 36, told me: "Britain is to blame for 
				this; like Palestine, like Zimbabwe, your history has a hand in 
				the death of innocents in 2009, and the British government 
				should stand up and take ownership of it - and you are more 
				worried about some overpaid politicians not being able to get to 
				work?" It is a view of history held by most Tamils, who believe 
				that Sri Lanka's substantial Tamil minority once had their own 
				autonomy in the north before the British Empire turned the whole 
				island into the colony of Ceylon. Britain, they claim, then 
				handed Ceylon's Sinhalese majority rule and independence in 1948 
				as a single entity, without enshrining the rights of the Tamils 
				to their own land and language. 
				
				Krishna Ruban, another protester, said: "This is a war without 
				witness. The media is cut off from what is really happening in 
				Sri Lanka. A genocide is being hidden from the world." He then 
				added: "London-born teenagers who have never even been to Sri 
				Lanka are marching with their grandparents. This is about 
				brothers and fathers and sisters being killed. I know people who 
				have lost 15 members of their family. It is not just here - 
				there are demonstrations in France, Germany, Holland, 
				Switzerland, America and Canada. It is literally everywhere."
				
				
				According to the UN, more than 8,000 civilian refugees were 
				killed on the Sri Lankan battlefield this year, mostly in the 
				past three months in a government-designated "no-fire zone". 
				There is also mounting evidence, including testimony from those 
				who escaped it, to suggest that army bombardments were mostly to 
				blame for this. Some, although fewer in number, have also 
				accused the LTTE of shooting at them to try to prevent their 
				escape. 
				
				On 25 May, the United Nations Human Rights Council convened a 
				special session on Sri Lanka, following a request submitted by 
				Germany on behalf of 17 mostly European countries. Its members 
				proceeded to vote down a proposed resolution decrying the Sri 
				Lankan government's disregard for civilian life. But another 
				draft resolution tabled by the Sri Lankan government itself, 
				praising its own commitment to human rights, was passed by a 
				vote of 29 to 16. Its supporters included China, Cuba, India, 
				Russia, Pakistan and Egypt. 
				
				By effectively welcoming the "liberation" of tens of thousands 
				of the island's citizens from the grip of the Tamil Tigers, the 
				UN made no mention of the shelling of civilians and kept silent 
				on the desperate need to allow the Red Cross and other 
				humanitarian groups into the camps where some 300,000 Tamil 
				civilians have been interned. 
				
				Navi Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, insisted 
				that there still needed to be an inquiry into "very serious 
				abuses", yet Sureen Surendiram, of the British Tamils Forum, 
				said that the UN was paying lip service to the civilised world, 
				again. Human Rights Watch and leaked UN documents recently 
				suggested the death toll was closer to 20,000, with many of the 
				dead women and children, he said. "And now the Sri Lankan 
				government is holding our loved ones in massive internment 
				camps, the likes of which we haven't seen since the Second World 
				War." He added: "The fighting may be over, but retribution 
				killings are being carried out in the camps. Our people are also 
				starving and dying from lack of medical help."
				
				The Lonely Planet guidebook says the beach at Uppuveli is the 
				most beautiful on Sri Lanka's east coast. As the sun sets it 
				certainly looks like an island paradise, a curve of white sand 
				with palm trees and deep emerald water. If you drive through the 
				jungle in the east, you can see errant herds of wild elephants 
				crossing the road. Long-tailed monkeys watch nervously from the 
				trees. At night, fireflies hang by the roadside. This is the Sri 
				Lanka tourists flock from around the world to see, but along the 
				road to the town, hundreds of soldiers line the road, looking 
				nervously into the jungle. Despite the war coming to an end, 
				fear of last-gasp Tamil Tiger suicide attacks cuts to the core 
				of every soldier here in the northeast. On closer inspection, 
				Uppuveli's beach is littered with sewage and rubbish, its hotels 
				boarded up. No tourists come here any more. The jungle, long 
				burned by government soldiers trying to clear the roads of 
				hiding places for Tamil Tiger guerrillas, is a twisted and 
				charred wasteland. 
				
				Here in the Sivananda Thaovanam Orphanage, more than 100 
				children huddle together against the pounding rain outside. The 
				children's eyes betray the tragedies they could not easily put 
				into words. Each child has his or her own story, but they all 
				have one thing in common: their parents were killed in the war. 
				Four-year-old Mohanapriya's eyes light up as she speaks about 
				her parents, telling us how she is waiting for them to come and 
				take her home. "She is too young to understand they are gone," 
				says one of the orphanage directors. "What can we say to her?"
				
				The orphanage is threadbare, like its inhabitants. The room 
				which serves as their bedroom, a communal hall with peeling 
				paint and a few lockers with broken locks, overflows with 
				second-hand clothes and toys that have seen better days. The 
				only bed is piled high with mats, sheets and pillows. Despite 
				its woeful lack of facilities, Sivananda Thaovanam has been a 
				safe haven for 240 children for four years. Twelve-year-old 
				Theverajah Kajenthini cries as she remembers the day she lost 
				her mother. Trapped on the frontline of the war, a Sri Lankan 
				government shell ripped through their home, killing her sister, 
				her aunt and her mother. Several months later her father, 
				accused of being a Tamil Tiger sympathiser, was executed by 
				"unknown forces". "I don't understand what has happened to me," 
				she says. "Like the other children in here we don't talk about 
				the past. I am old enough to know my parents are gone but the 
				younger children laugh and play and tell us their mums and dads 
				are coming back. Many of the children in my village became 
				orphans during the fighting. I can't deny what happened to me. I 
				saw my mother's body. She was on fire after the shelling and 
				died of burns to her face and neck. Her head was black, it was 
				the last I saw of her." 
				
				Across the north of Sri Lanka, hundreds of orphanages such as 
				this house are the legacy of Sri Lanka's 30-year civil war, the 
				orphans cast adrift like flotsam. Most remain traumatised. With 
				no funding for rehabilitation or counselling, their fates seem 
				to be sealed at a tragically young age. Most are introverted and 
				prone to intense periods of grief and depression. They all live 
				a bleak and meagre existence. 
				
				"The camps to the north of here are full of children like me, I 
				am told," says 11-year-old Mahetevan Suganya. "Tamil boys and 
				girls like me who cannot escape. At least I have my friends here 
				in the orphanage and I can walk in the garden and play with my 
				toys. The director tells us all we are fortunate to be here and 
				to be protected from the war. I don't feel particularly lucky. I 
				feel angry and upset at what is happening to me." 
				
				In the corridors of power in Colombo, the hard-won victory over 
				the Tamil Tigers would have been savoured by one family above 
				all: that of the Sri Lankan president, Percy Mahinda Rajapaksa, 
				who carved out victory with the help of his brothers, Gotabaya, 
				the defence secretary, and Basil, who largely masterminded the 
				political and diplomatic strategies that accompanied the war 
				effort. The brothers, members of a prominent political family of 
				Sri Lanka's Buddhist Sinhalese majority, won through utter 
				ruthlessness. In contrast to previous Oxbridge-educated leaders, 
				they had no links to the English-speaking elite of Colombo and 
				showed few qualms in severing Sri Lanka's ties with the west in 
				favour of strengthening relations with China and Russia - 
				countries that supplied sophisticated military hardware and 
				diplomatic muscle. 
				
				In giving the cold shoulder to Britain and the United States, 
				the president also won the approval of ultra-nationalist 
				Buddhist monk MPs, who had demanded victory at any cost over the 
				Tigers and on whom Rajapaksa depends for his parliamentary 
				majority. In 2006, a year after he became president, air, sea 
				and ground assaults were launched against rebel strongholds in 
				the north and east. The army nearly doubled in size to 180,000 
				men in two years and began to adopt guerrilla tactics, using the 
				Tigers' own methods - sending in death squads to kill rebel 
				leaders. Now the president, a lawyer who worked as a film actor 
				and library clerk before entering politics, enjoys 
				messianic-like status in the country he rules with an iron fist. 
				Many Sri Lankans feel he has deliberately blurred the genuine 
				grievances of the Tamil minority - a community that has been 
				oppressed since it lost its favoured status with the end of 
				British rule - with the atrocities carried out by the terrorist 
				Tigers over 26 years. They also suspect that a new period of 
				persecution and oppression of the Tamils will emerge with a 
				victorious Sinhalese government. 
				
				As I travelled across Sri Lanka, President Rajapaksa, basking in 
				victory, declared the final defeat of the Liberation Tigers of 
				Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in a speech to his parliament on 19 May. But 
				more than 30 opposition chairs in the 225-seat chamber were 
				vacant. Members of the Tamil National Alliance, the largest 
				group of parties representing the Tamil minority in the north 
				and east of the island, had refused to take their seats. It was 
				a reminder of an unhappy and uncomfortable truth: the Tamil 
				Tigers may be finished as a fighting force, but the bitter 
				ethnic divisions that fuelled the 26-year war live on. 
				
				Some hours later, as I walked the streets of the Sri Lankan 
				capital, state television aired footage of the dead Tamil Tiger 
				supremo, Velupillai Prabhakaran, the back of his head missing 
				from what was undeniably a summary execution, a cloth covering 
				the top of his skull, which appeared to have been blown off. 
				Prabhakaran's Tamil Eelam once existed as an unofficial nation 
				within a nation, a state that ran on a different time zone 
				(Indian time), had its own police force, jails, judicial system, 
				and semi-extortionate system of tax collection. Everywhere 
				across Tamil Elam flew the Tamil Tiger flag: a roaring tiger 
				backed by a pair of crossed Kalashnikovs, pouncing with claws 
				bared from a cartoonish explosion. Walking through Wellawetta, a 
				predominately Tamil district of Colombo, nationalist Sinhalese 
				flags flutter from every Tamil home for fear of Government 
				reprisals. In a dark corner of the slum suburb a scrawl of 
				graffiti quotes an adapted Indian proverb: "Do not blame God for 
				having created the tiger, thank him for not giving it wings."
				
				"You can't go down that road. You shouldn't have come this way," 
				the soldier bellows, first in Sinhalese and then in English, his 
				hand menacingly stroking the nuzzle of the rifle splayed across 
				his chest. I look at his bony black fingers - he is pointing 
				east towards the coastal town of Pulmoddai and the road we have 
				just travelled down. 
				
				"How did you get here from there? It is a dangerous route and 
				you are a target for terrorists." Behind our interrogator I 
				recognise a parked Alvis Saracen personnel carrier, its adapted 
				gun turret trained on our minivan. As we speak three other 
				soldiers come out of a small hut. The tallest flourishes a 
				revolver and demands we hand over our passports. He then 
				disappears to make a call. I'm convinced after a series of close 
				shaves we will finally be arrested, possibly beaten, certainly 
				deported. 
				
				"We are tourists and we are lost," I explain, without prompting. 
				In the back of the van, in the stitching of the carpet, we have 
				hidden digital memory cards and a small notebook, the only 
				record we have of a refugee camp we stumbled across 20 miles to 
				the north. Our presence there, to witness the incarceration of 
				around 6,000 Sri Lankan refugees, had sent the camp directors 
				running for their satellite phones. On Sri Lankan radio, 
				government-sponsored adverts have called on the nation to 
				effectively "finger" foreigners trying to head north.
				
				Behind the barbed-wire fence at the Pulmoddai camp, tiny 
				children had stared out at us, open-mouthed, their eyes sunken 
				and hollow, the first signs of malnutrition. Around the camps, 
				scarcely functioning mothers and grandmothers waited patiently 
				for brown trickles of water to emerge from the earth. The 
				inmates were surrounded by a cordon of steel: dozens of Sri 
				Lankan soldiers sitting at 10-yard intervals around the 
				perimeter of the compound, their weapons cocked and trained on 
				their captives. 
				
				It had taken a 13-hour drive along dangerous roads and past a 
				dozen heavily militarised checkpoints to get this far. At every 
				corner the Sri Lankan military, which has effectively created a 
				border across the entire country, cutting off the north of the 
				island to foreigners, tried to intimidate and stop us, 
				brandishing weapons and forcing us back at each turn. 
				
				Brought down by ship from the frontline 50 miles to the north, 
				the Pulmoddai refugees before us are effectively prisoners of 
				war - their plight among the first evidence of an attempt by the 
				Sri Lankan authorities to inter stricken refugees in dozens of 
				camps across the north of the island. To the north, hundreds of 
				thousands more share a similar fate, and the looming threat of 
				deadly disease and malnutrition.
				
				Along the hard road to the Pulmoddai refugee camp is heard the 
				sound of hammering and the clink of metal. Before our eyes Sri 
				Lankan soldiers hammer huge wooden stakes into the ground to 
				create another perimeter fence to "imprison more refugees". 
				Beside the road lies thousands of yards of razorwire fencing. 
				"More are coming," says a locally recruited engineer drafted in 
				to help build an access road. "They are coming from the front, 
				perhaps tens of thousands more, for the long term. Each hole in 
				the ground stretching into the far distance over there is 
				another stake to imprison them."
				
				It is closing in on midnight. A police siren breaks the 
				stillness of the summer evening as a handful of weary Tamil 
				protesters begin packing up for the night, folding banners and 
				neatly packing flyers and posters with red elastic bands. Their 
				organisation and attention to detail is meticulous; there is 
				little money for more flyers, and those they have left over for 
				another day are precious - each thin piece of paper a witness 
				statement from their families and loved ones. 
				
				A young Tamil student returns to the square after scouring the 
				bins in the streets around Westminster, retrieving the crumpled 
				and folded flyers nonchalantly discarded by passers-by. "Did 
				they stop to look at these?" he cries, pointing to a crudely 
				photocopied photograph of a dead child cradled in his father's 
				arms.
				
				Some of the protesters will take the trundling night bus to 
				Neasden and Wembley, and home to their extended families. 
				Others, who have come down from the Midlands, will share hostel 
				rooms or sleep rough in the backstreets sweeping down towards 
				the Embankment, avoiding CCTV cameras and police patrols, before 
				returning to their placards and rainbow banners at dawn, 
				tramping bleary-eyed over the grassy heart of democratic 
				Britain.
				
				Many of the Tamils here have abandoned their jobs to make their 
				stand. Karunakaran, 28, files through a shoe box of belongings 
				and pulls out a dog-eared passport photo of his younger brother. 
				He nervously fingers the Kavala, the sacred Hindu red string 
				wrapped twice around his wrist. 
				
				"He is dead, my brother; this is what my head says, but there is 
				still hope in me that he is lying in a hospital somewhere, 
				fighting for his life, making it through for me and my mother. 
				There are so many trapped in the camps and they are unable to 
				get messages to the outside world. People are scouring websites 
				and the news for a glimpse of their parents or their brothers. 
				It's the uncertainty that kills you slowly. You see their faces 
				in your sleep, you wake up at night and cry, wondering where 
				they are, if they are suffering, if they are starving to death, 
				if they are in prison being tortured or cast out to sea in a 
				boat."
				
				As he speaks Karunakaran produces a pile of paperwork from a 
				file. At the head of the most recent document from Eaton House 
				Immigration Service in London the words "Liability to Detention" 
				glare out bleakly from the page. "I've been in Britain for 10 
				years but the immigration authorities are now telling me it is 
				safe for me to go back to Sri Lanka," he says. "My sister was 
				killed, my brother and cousin are missing. They are telling me 
				to go back, and I'm not the only one. Your country gives me the 
				right to protest here on Parliament Square, but your government 
				is also intent on sending me back to a land where those same 
				protests will lead to my death."
				
				Taming the Tigers
				
				1972 Armed with just a revolver, Velupillai Prabhakaran forms a 
				Tamil militant group, which eventually becomes the Liberation 
				Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
				
				23 JULY 1983 LTTE ambushes an army patrol, killing 13 soldiers 
				in the Jaffna peninsula and sparking anti-Tamil riots elsewhere 
				that leave around 600 people dead
				
				8 JULY 1985 Sri Lanka opens first direct talks with Tamil 
				guerrillas. They fail
				
				29 JULY 1987 India and Sri Lanka reach agreement on the 
				deployment of an Indian peacekeeping force
				
				24 MARCH 1990 India loses 1,200 troops at the hands of the LTTE, 
				and withdraws to leave the Tigers in control of large parts of 
				northern Sri Lanka
				
				21 MAY 1991 Indian prime minister Rajiv Gandhi is assassinated 
				by a Tamil Tiger suicide bomber
				
				1 MAY 1993Sri Lankan president Ranasinghe Premadasa is 
				assassinated by a Tiger suicide bomber
				
				2 DECEMBER 1995 The Sri Lankan army captures the Jaffna 
				peninsula
				
				8 OCTOBER 1997 The United States declares the LTTE a foreign 
				terrorist organisation 
				
				25 JANUARY 1998 An LTTE suicide bomber devastates Sri Lanka's 
				holiest Buddhist shrine, the Temple of the Tooth, killing 17 
				people
				
				FEBRUARY 2001 Britain outlaws the LTTE as a terrorist 
				organisation, followed in 2006 by Canada and in 2007 by 
				Australia
				
				DECEMBER 2002 At peace talks in Norway, the government and 
				rebels agree to share power, with the minority Tamils enjoying 
				autonomy in the mainly Tamil-speaking north and east
				
				3 MARCH 2004 Renegade Tamil Tiger commander, V. Muralitharan, 
				known as Karuna, leads a damaging split from the main rebel 
				movement 
				
				2 NOVEMBER 2007 The head of the Tamil Tigers' political wing, SP 
				Thamilselvan, is killed in a government air raid
				
				2 JANUARY 2008 Sri Lanka withdraws
				from a ceasefire deal and steps up attacks against the Tigers
				
				
				2 JANUARY 2009 Sri Lankan forces capture Kilinochchi, leaving 
				the Tigers only the jungle district of Mullaittivu
				
				14 APRIL 2009 The Tamil Tigers say they are ready to negotiate a 
				ceasefire and restart peace talks. The government refuses, 
				ordering them to surrender 
				
				20 APRIL 2009 Tens of thousands of trapped civilians manage to 
				flee from the shrinking area still under rebel control
				
				13 MAY 2009 For the first time, the United Nations Security 
				Council asks the warring parties to spare civilians 
				
				16 MAY 2009 President Mahinda Rajapakse says the rebels have 
				been defeated
				
				17 MAY 2009 The Tamil Tigers concede that the battle "has 
				reached its bitter end" and that they have "decided to silence 
				our guns"