*  
The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation
* indicates link to 
			amazon.com
			bookshop on line
			
				[see also
				
				"You Can't Lump All Terrorists Together" - Hillary Clinton 
				speaking to
				
				Michael Tomasky about Iraq, the legacy of the Cold War, 
				Mukasey and ceding executive powers ]
			
			
			
				
				
				
Editorial 
				Reviews
				
				Bill Clinton - "This is the most interesting, informative 
				book on politics I've read in many years...you have to read this 
				book." 
				
				Howard Dean - "Drew Westen is a must read...we will win the 
				Presidency if our candidate reads and acts on this book." 
			
			Review by
			
			Annabel Moorman at Amazon.com
Though there is nothing entirely 
			new here, in this large well researched book Westin manages to draw 
			together several ideas that have been part of our intellectual 
			discourse for some time in an engaging and informative way. 
			
Westin uses 4 themes throughout the book. First, he explains how 
			our human brain evolved over millions of years to make decisions 
			first with our emotions and only secondarily with our logical 
			faculties. This is because we evolved out of other life forms that 
			had a simpler brain structure. The first uses of the brain were for 
			sensation and perception, uses that would tend to keep the primitive 
			forms that were the first conscious creatures alive. 
			
Second, he uses this model of the brain to explain why emotional 
			intelligence controls absolutely every decision that people make, 
			and that this is no where more true than in electoral politics. The 
			dominance of the emotional brain predates and supersedes the thin 
			human veil of reason, and this has proved to be a successful 
			adaptation over thousands of years. 
			
Third, he shows that with the exceptions of FDR and Bill Clinton 
			the democrats have been consistently emotionally tone deaf in their 
			national campaigns, and that they will not be able to win until this 
			is addressed. 
			
Finally, he explores the importance of a consistent emotionally 
			appealing story or narrative to present to the voting public about 
			the values of the party and the candidate. Only after voters 
			understand and resonate with these two things do they care about the 
			issues. The right wing understood this when they supplanted the 
			winning narrative of the new deal with their own narrative of small 
			government and individual hard work. Westin writes this story well, 
			and then shows how the democratic leadership could damage the power 
			of this story and create one of their own that would be just as 
			emotionally compelling or more so. 
			
Throughout the book Westin offers detailed accounts of both 
			successful and unsuccessful campaign strategies. He also describes 
			some major flubs made by democratic candidates and describes what 
			they could have said and done to win the hearts of the people. 
			Westin tells us that a good story will speak directly to the 
			emotional brains of the left wing and moderates alike, but if it 
			does not anger the 30% on the hard right it has not been entirely 
			successful. This is because a good story must knock down the 
			antagonist as it builds up the protagonist. At the same time the 
			democrats appeal only to reason they are also much too timid in 
			defending the very real values that the party stands for. 
			
If Westin is right the democrats need to nominate a truly 
			charismatic candidate and then speak directly to the American heart. 
			It's not enough that the republicans have made a colossal mess. To 
			win, the democrats must offer an emotionally compelling alternative 
			and not be afraid to shout it from the rooftops. Every democrat 
			should read this book.