Sri Lanka General Elections - European Union Observer Team & Real Politick

Comments by Cordula Reinmann

The Sinhala owned Sri Lanka Sunday Island reported on 7 January 2001: " Cordula Reimann of the Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford, West Yorkshire, who was a member of the team of election observers from the European Union covering the recently concluded parliamentary elections, in an open letter to the MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) of all member states participating in the said exercise, roundly condemned the final report of the observation mission for "not naming explicitly and addressing the violence organized and committed by the ruling party, the PA under Chandrika Kumaratunga".

Reimann criticised the report for its vagueness and charged that the EU was engaged in nothing less than a strategic manoeuvre in order to give some kind of stability and legitimacy to the PA government and expressed that as a result "it is not surprising that many Sri Lankans may be very suspicious and critical of Norway entering the political arena as a third party facilitator".

Excerpts from the statement follow:

"I am writing to you in my role as short-term election observer with the EU elections observation mission to Sri Lanka in October.

"I am afraid that the trust many Sri Lankans put in the EU observation mission were shattered with the press statement on October 12 and the publication of the final report on November 2

"Many Sri Lankans feel and felt betrayed, especially as the EU did not explicitly name and address the violence organized and committed by the ruling party, the PA under Chandrika Kumaratunga.

"By calling the elections neither free and fair nor unfair, the EU mission followed a double but tricky strategy. On the one hand it aimed at strengthening the ruling but shaky Sri Lankan government. I highly doubt that the mission achieved it own goal of '(restoring) popular confidence in the legitimacy of the electoral process and the institutions of representative democracy' (point 3.2 of the EU Project Proposal). It was foreseeable that if the EU mission does not explicitly call these elections NOT free and fair, the local, especially the pro-government, media will turn around, pick and choose what they want to hear and write 'British and EU monitors say free and fair elections'. (see Daily News of October 13)

"I understand the EU was thus vague to serve the strategic interest of giving stability and legitimacy to the PA-government. And given the pre-election violence and massive vote-rigging in previous elections this line of argument would make some good sense. However, if you argue along those lines, you have to call into question the very rationale of international elections monitoring in particular.

"These days the local and diaspora Sri Lankans think the whole EU presence was indeed a political 'farce' and another form of dirty politics. It was expected that the EU mission would call a spade a spade. In fact, most of the pre-election violence for example in Anuradhapura and Kandy was initiated by the PA. And these were not isolated, single cases - one may well speak of some kind of pattern. We collected a great body of evidence which all testify the very harassment and open intimidation of for example UNP supporters by PA supporters, both before and on the polling day.

"All these records went to our core team. In terms of the pre-election period, the PA did not stick to the 48 hours of silence, but went on campaigning, even the night before the elections. The road and buildings on the way to the polling stations were covered by fresh PA posters, political campaign material etc.

"I am confident that you as MEP (Members of the European Parliament) will make sure that some of my concerns will be heard in the relevant EU Commission's and Parliament's committees."

Sri Lanka previously known, as Ceylon is an island of approximately 20 million people, located just off the southeastern coast of India. Occupied by the Portuguese in the sixteenth century and the Dutch in the seventeenth century it became a British colony in 1802. It achieved its independence in 1948. Tensions between the Sinhalese majority and Tamil separatists erupted in violence in the 1980�s. Since 1983 there has been a violent conflict between successive governments and the Tamil Tigers who have been seeking independence for the North and Eastern parts of the Island resulting in over 60,000 deaths.

Unlike other countries to which the International Community send Election Observers, Sri Lanka has enjoyed universal suffrage since 1931 and has a long history of changing government through elections. Regrettably past elections have been marred by violence and intimidation most of it attributable to the two main political parties, the Peoples Alliance (PA) and the United National Party (UNP). The Provincial and Presidential elections last year were particularly bad. The problems caused by violence were further exacerbated by serious electoral malpractice. Not surprisingly these factors are undermining the integrity of the electoral process resulting in a loss of faith in the democratic process itself and undermining the legitimacy and credibility of the political system.

It was against this background that the European Commission decided to send a seventy- seven strong team of E.U. Observers to observe the current parliamentary elections over a period of approximately one month. Given the scale of the problems and violence that existed, it was a formidable challenge. By the end of the election campaign, over fifty people had been murdered and hundreds more have been injured and this violence has continued into the post election period.

The remaining victims who were either murdered or injured were casualties of violence between the supporters of the two main parties and on some occasions as a result of internal party rivalry. There was a significant level of violence on polling day itself resulting in at least five murders. The most serious election violence was concentrated in the Central Province region particularly the district of Kandy.

As well as the problems of violence, our observation team witnessed significant abuse of public resources by the government during the campaigning period. This included the use of government vehicles and government employees in the campaigning process, threats to withdraw social security payments and unequal access to government controlled media especially during the concluding days of the campaign.

Although previous elections had experienced major electoral fraud it was minimized in these elections thanks to the integrity and commitment of the Election Commissioner Mr Dayananada Dissanayake and his staff. Although like his predecessors he was a political appointment, he exercised his mandate independently of pressure from the government. He introduced many new measures, which considerably tightened up election procedures, and he also rendered null and void votes and polling stations where there were serious problems on polling day.

In delivering a verdict on the election two fundamental issues need to be addressed. Firstly, did the violence and the malpractice prevent the people of Sri Lanka from exercising their franchise.

Secondly, did these factors distort the election result?

In answer to the first question the answer is no. Over seventy five percent of the people of Sri Lanka voted despite these problems.

In relation to the second question it would have been difficult to conclude that the election was �free and fair� in all districts. However due to the prompt actions of the Election Commissioner (and not withstanding the serious problems that did exist) it would be fair to conclude that the overall result did to a reasonable degree reflect the will of the electorate. (see also 'double but tricky strategy')

Recommendations are made in the conclusions of the report as to what measures should be taken to prevent a continued reoccurrence of the problems that were witnessed and reported to the EU mission.

Certain party activists did not respect the law following the close of campaigning at midnight on Saturday 7 October. Campaign activities of various types were observed in some areas. Campaign Violence