all towns are one, all men our kin.
|Home||Whats New||Trans State Nation||One World||Unfolding Consciousness||Comments||Search|
Selected Writings by Sachi Sri Kantha
Arthur C. Clarke, Mrs. B and My Fan Letter
15 April 2008
The multi-talented science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke, the most renowned foreign resident in Sri Lanka, passed away on March 19th, at the age of 90. I had a one-letter interaction with him in 1976. It may not be inappropriate to bring this to light now, since considering its brevity and the unusual format (also most probably without any copies kept in his files!) in which it was sent to me, I believe that his short response to my fan letter will have a miniscule chance of appearing in any of Arthur Clarke’s future anthologies.
First to the setting and circumstances: In January 1976, I had just completed four years as an undergrad at the University of Colombo. As I had indicated recently in my obituary notes to late Anura Bandaranaike [vide, Anura Bandaranaike – A Candid, Contra View], the Time magazine had published the infamous ‘Bandaranaike family tree’ in its December 15, 1975 issue.
This particular issue was banned in Sri Lanka, since that one page feature showed the then prime minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike and her courtiers in a not so favorable light. In response to this feature, the Colombo Daily Mirror of January 1, 1976 carried a short front page pro-SLFP item.
In this box-feature, Arthur Clarke had been quoted as having made an objection to the Time magazine’s expose of Bandaranaike ‘Family Tree’. Clarke had noted that nepotism was prevalent in the United National Party as well, and that its pejorative moniker is ‘Uncle Nephew Party’.
The bottom line of this pro-Sirimavo spin was that, at that time Anura Bandaranaike was in the Director’s panel of Daily Mirror’s then publisher. Thus, it became apparent that the Daily Mirror’s rebuttal to the Time magazine’s expose, by using Arthur Clarke’s name as a vehicle, was sponsored by the retainers of Bandaranaike family.
Having read this pro-Sirimavo spin in the Daily Mirror, I thought that I would better send a letter to Arthur Clarke, expressing my disappointment in getting his name enmeshed in the local political propaganda. So, I wrote him a fan letter (a copy or details of which I haven’t preserved!). But I still remember the thrust of my epistle. I had made a request to Arthur Clarke, not to allow his name to be used for local partisan politics, and not to allow his name become tainted because of this.
According to my diary entry for 7 Jan 1976 (Wed), on that day I received this letter from Arthur Clarke, in response to my letter to him, sent on 3 Jan 1976 (Sat). His letter (carrying the date 6 Jan 76) was typed in red ink, in the two page form letter he had then used to side-step and disengage the usual horde of autograph hunters, and assorted help seekers. I was pleased that (1) he didn’t consider my brief letter as belonging to this horde, (2) he thought that my letter deserved a response and (3) he had placed his signature at the end, in the somewhat unconventional letter typed in red ink.
On page 1 of his form letter, he had typed in red “Dear Mr Sri Kantha – pl see over”. Then, in page 2 (where some space was available), he had typed his response. To quote the details (with the words in large case font, underlined, and within parenthesis and dots, as well as the typo- error in ‘reason’, as in the original):
For the uninitiated who may wonder about the identities of the Sri Lankan politicians noted by initials/first name, here are the details: Mrs. B (Sirimavo Bandaranaike, the then leader of ruling SLFP), J.R. (J.R. Jayewardene, the then leader of opposition UNP), Pieter (Pieter Keuneman, the then leader of Communist Party) and N.M. (N.M. Perera, the then leader of Trotskyist LSSP).
For the curiosity-minded, I provide the scans of the two original pages from Arthur Clarke’s letter, since the details provided in his form letter also make interesting reading about how he handled his mails from fans and other publicity seekers who wished a sip from his cup of reputation. I should add, that this one and only letter I received from Arthur Clarke was not preserved properly due to some lack in my foresight. It had got smudged from a cycle of ‘pasting-retrieval-pasting-retrieval’ in my autograph books and files. But still it’s form and contents remain preserved. I regret now that I had disposed the envelope which carried this letter to me from Colombo 7 to Colombo 4, where I resided then.
Though I treasure this 1976 postal letter from Arthur Clarke, it is ironic that some of the advances in telecommunication science prophesied by him in mid-20th century had made the postal letters somewhat obsolete now. The only letters that I eagerly wait to receive now via regular post comes only from my mother and a few aged kins for whom computer is not an essential item.