Index of
Seminar Papers |
Session 1: Causes of the Conflict &
Factors leading to Ceasefire
The three
basic insights in Conflict Transformation
practice and theory are -
address the root causes of conflict; do not
indulge in the hierarchy of assigning blame
on each other as to who did what to whom and
acknowledge that in an asymmetric conflict,
the recognition of the past is crucial for
moving forward. It is also crucial to
understand the factors leading to CFA and
evaluate if they are still valid.
|
Paper 1 - Prof. Jayadeva Uyangoda -
Sri Lanka�s Ethnic Conflict: �Root Causes� |
Paper 2 - Dr. Rajan
Sriskandarajah -
Sri Lanka: State of the country before the CFA |
Paper 3- Prof. Sumanasiri Liyanage -
What led to the Cessation of Hostilities? |
Paper 4- Prof. A.J.V.
Chandrakanthan - A Century of Sinhala-Tamil Conflict and
Peace-making in Retrospect |
Session 2:
Analysis of CFA & its Implementation
This being the focal point of
Geneva talks in
February 2006
and its follow-up, it is essential now more than ever before. Has there
been a change in the balance of power since 2001? (If it is no longer
valid, then, what are the factors that may create equality?)
|
Paper 1 - Dr. Kumar Rupesinghe -
Analysis of the Implementation of the Ceasefire Agreement |
Paper 2 - Rev. A.I. Bernard -
Analysis of the Ceasefire Agreement and its Implementation |
Session 3:
Tsunami Disaster Response - Politics of Aid � SIHRN- PTOMs
The basic assumption
of the peace process in 2002/2003 was that the �politics of
normalization� can build a bridge between the CFA and the core political
issues. This however, has completely failed to take place, even in the
case of the Tsunami response.
|
Paper 1 Ms. Nimalka Fernando
-
Tsunami disaster response and its relevance for
peace process |
Paper 2 Prof. Georg Frerks
-
The Politics of Post-tsunami Reconstruction in War-torn Sri Lanka |
Paper 3 Mr. Ana Pararajasingham -
The Failure of Joint Mechanisms � Causes,
Consequences and Conclusions |
Session 4:
Dynamics of the Peace Process
One of the basic
insights in the assessment of peace efforts in Sri Lanka has been the
policy of �ethnic outbidding and out-maneuvering� used on the southern
polity. Right now, there is a realignment of ethno-nationalistic forces.
These in turn, have an impact on the dynamics within the Tamil and
Muslim polity. Hence, to make progress, these internal dynamics and
reinforcing tendencies, need to be addressed.
|
Paper 1 Dr. Jehan Perera -
Southern Dynamics in Peace Process |
Paper 2 Ms. Jezima Ismail -
Why a Muslim Perspective to the Peace Process? |
Paper 3 Mr. David Rampton -
Nationalism in the Southern Polity
and the 2002-2005 Peace Process |
Paper 4 Hon. G.G. Ponnambalam
MP -
Northern Dynamics of the Peace Process |
Session 5:
Process Analysis of the Peace Process
Beyond internal
dynamics, the other key factor would be the lack of interaction between
the parties; the relationship between the GoSL and the LTTE
|
Paper 1 Mr. Tyrol Ferdinands
- Thoughts on Process |
Paper 2 Prof. Kristian Stokke
- State Formation and Political Change in LTTE-controlled Areas in Sri Lanka |
Paper 3 Mr. Visuvanathan
Rudrakumaran - LTTE�s Flexibility in the Current Peace Process |
Session 6:
Strategies of the Parties in the Peace Process - Net impact for the people
Two main topics were
highlighted in this session: The factors that led to the lack of a
tangible peace dividend for the people and the broader strategies
pursued by the negotiating parties to maximize their BATNA (Best
Alternative to Negotiated Agreement)
|
Paper 1 Prof. Vijitha
Nanayakara - Strategies of the Parties in the Peace Process � Net impact for the
People |
Paper 2 Prof. Peter Schalk - War
of Words - An Obstacle to Peace |
Paper 3 Prof. Palanisamy Ramasamy -
Strategies for Peace: Comparing Acheh with Sri Lanka |
Paper 4 Mr. Brian Smith -
Strategies of Parties in the Peace Process and Net Impact for the People |
Session 7:
International Frame - Norway as facilitator -
Regional factors - Concept of Co-chairs - Politics of Sanctions and Incentives
The �international�
component of the peace process is of significant importance, especially
given the discourse that the peace process is being
�over-internationalized�. With the creation of an �international safety
net�, the international community is perceived to be another stakeholder
to the conflict in Sri Lanka. Moreover, the international component
encompasses the involvement of Norway as the facilitator, the role of
the co-chairs, the regional factors and the ensuing politics of
sanctions and incentives.
|
Paper 1 Mr. Viraj Mendis -
Building a genuine pro-peace tendency in the �international community� regarding
Sri Lanka |
Paper 2 Mr. M.H.M. Salman -
The Muslim Perspective |
Paper 3 Dr. Jonathan Goodhand -
Internationalization of the Peace Process |
Paper 4 Ms.Vinothiny
Kanapathippillai - Too much, too
fast or a peace trap? |
Session 8:
Re-envisioning Sri Lanka - Lessons-learned & Challenges and Opportunities
The Seminar
examined the lessons learned and explored the challenges and
opportunities that lay ahead. Among the matters discussed was the
question whether a resolution of the conflict may be secured by
a. an unitary constitution with extensive devolution; or
b. a federal constitution with a thick framework of power sharing; or
c. a confederation of states; or
d. an association of states on the lines of the European Union
The Seminar
recognized the historical nature of the Ceasefire Agreement concluded
between Sri Lanka and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in February
2002 and the international recognition accorded to the Ceasefire
Agreement. The Seminar was mindful that legal frameworks directed
to resolve the conflict will need to accord with the political reality
on the ground and take into account the national identities of the
peoples in the island, their aspirations as peoples and more importantly
their fears and concerns.
|
Paper 1 Prof. John P Neelsen -
New Trajectories for Peace in Sri Lanka -
Re-Envisioning Sri Lanka |
Paper 2 Dr. Jayampathy
Wickramaratne - Re-envisioning Sri Lanka |
Paper 3 Mr. Suthaharan Nadarajah -
Re-envisioning Sri
Lanka: the present, not the past matters most |
Paper 4 Prof. M. Sornarajah -
Envisioning Sri Lanka |
Paper 5 Ms. Karen Parker -
Re-Envisioning Sri Lanka |
Paper 6 Prof. Navaratna
Bandara - The Peace Process of 2002-2005 - Lessons
learned, challenges and opportunities |
Paper 7 Mr.Victor Ivan -
The Crisis of the State of Sri Lanka calls for a Re-creation
of the State rather than Adhoc Reforms |
Paper 8 Dr. Sachithanandam
Sathananthan - Re-envisioning Sri Lanka: ways
forward and breaking the dead-lock |
Paper 9 Dr.Brian
Senewiratne - Trajectories
for Peace in Sri Lanka |
Paper 10 Mr. Vasu Gounden -
Ways Forward & Breaking the Deadlock |
Paper 11 Dr.Roshan de Silva
Wijeratne -
States of Mind and States of History:
The Future in Sri Lanka Can Be Decentered
|
Paper 12 Ms.Madura
Rasaratnam - Re-envisioning Sri Lanka�s Ethno-Nationalisms |
Additional Short Papers on
�Re-envisioning Sri Lanka - Way Forward by
1.Father
A.I. Bernard, 2.
Professor Joseph Chandrakanthan, 3.Mr.
Victor Ivan, 4.Mr.Ana
Pararajasingham, 5.Dr.Jehan
Perera, 6.Hon.
G.G. Ponnampalam MP, 7.Mr.David
Rampton, 8.Mr.Brian
Smith, 9.Prof.
Kristian Stokke and 10
Prof. Jayadeva Uyangoda. (in
alphabetical order) |