| 
 Assistant Secretary Boucher: Good Afternoon ladies and 
gentlemen. It�s a pleasure to be here with you. It�s a pleasure to be here again 
in Sri Lanka. I had good meetings this morning with President Rajapakse and 
Foreign Minister Samaraweera in which we discussed a whole range of issues, most 
notably, of course, the political and security situation in the country. We also 
discussed with the Foreign Minister some of the areas of bilateral cooperation 
and in fact our international cooperation on issues such as Iran and other 
things coming up in the area. 
  I told the President that we welcome the 
restraint that the government has shown in the face of many provocations by the 
Tamil Tigers. I told him that we stood squarely behind the government in its 
struggle to combat terror. As you all know, our position on the Tamil Tigers is 
that they have to renounce terror in both word and deed and commit themselves to 
a negotiated settlement if they are to have any dealings with the United States. 
I also told the President that the government needs to do everything possible to 
maintain law and order and to ensure the full respect of human rights in the 
areas that are under the government�s control. There are groups that are 
committing violent crimes in those areas. We take the government at its words 
that it will investigate those crimes thoroughly and bring people to justice. 
  
Also, I reiterated our support, as I did in my speech today, for Norway�s 
facilitation mission and for the Sri Lankan Monitoring Mission. We talked about 
economic development. We talked about the tremendous potential and economic 
opportunity of this nation. We talked about the desire of the United States to 
assist Sri Lanka with its political and economic development. We all know that 
development can only happen in an environment where peace is coming, or peace is 
improving, and that to achieve its full potential Sri Lanka needs a final 
political settlement. We think it�s time for all the parties to think about that 
solution: to put forward proposals and face the hard choices that are needed to 
end the suffering. 
  Those of us who are outside this process cannot 
impose a settlement. That has to come about through direct talks with the 
parties. We will do everything we can to help, but we urge the LTTE and the 
government to get back to the negotiating table and to create the climate for 
de-escalation of the violence and solution of the problems. As one of the 
co-chairs, the United States will do all we can to support that effort. Now I�d 
be happy to take any questions you have. Who wants to start? 
  
Question: This is Simon Gardner from Reuters. The European Union statement 
also was fairly, well it had a criticism for the government too, as you just 
mentioned, that the government should fulfill its pledges that were made to 
disarm armed groups. However, the government doesn�t feel there was any 
criticism intended at all and it was purely aimed at the LTTE. Is the government 
missing the message? 
  Assistant Secretary Boucher: You�re asking 
an American to explain a European statement that the government has reacted to. 
I think I really have to decline the honor. I�m not a member of the EU. I�m not 
really in a position to explain the European Union�s statement. 
  
Question: I am Arun from Virakesari. In your speech in the late afternoon 
you said that if the Tigers give up terrorism the U.S. will be able to consider 
dealing with them. Does this mean there are possibilities to release the ban?
  Assistant Secretary Boucher: Our listings of terrorist 
organizations are based on the behavior of those organizations. We�d like 
nothing nicer than to be able to say that an organization or a government has 
ended its terrorist activities. But you need to see that happen not only in 
statements, but in deeds, and unfortunately the Tamil Tigers have not done that 
in any way. In fact, they�ve continued their provocative acts. They�ve 
accelerated their provocative acts and the fact is this is a terrorist 
organization and continues to be one. So what they are in terms of their 
activities, their terrorism is a matter of continuing concern. If they were to 
stop that, we could consider a different policy towards them. But frankly, it�s 
their behavior and their actions that have made it most difficult.
 
	I think we all understand that the Tamil community in Sri 
	Lanka has certain rights and certain needs and certain grievances that need 
	to be addressed. I met this morning with a number of representatives of the 
	Tamil community and just talked to them about how things are here and what 
	they felt and what they faced. 
	 Although we reject the methods that the Tamil Tigers have 
	used, there are legitimate issues that are raised by the Tamil community and 
	they have a very legitimate desire, as anybody would, to be able to control 
	their own lives, to rule their own destinies and to govern themselves in 
	their homeland; in the areas they�ve traditionally inhabited so I don�t want 
	to confuse the issue of talking to Tamils and understanding legitimate 
	grievances and legitimate aspirations of the Tamil community with not 
	talking to the LTTE. 
  
Whether to talk to the Tigers or not is based upon their 
behavior and if they continue terrorism we won�t. If they abandon terrorism and 
one�s able to say they are no longer a terrorist organization, then we would 
find opportunities to consider [dealing with them].  
 
Question: I�m Kumuda from the Sunday Leader. The Co-chairs have called 
upon the government and the LTTE to recommit to the agreements reached in the 
2003 and 2004 talks including the Oslo Communiqu� and the Geneva Talks recently. 
Do you expect this to happen? And, if not, what will your stance be?  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: I don�t know if it will happen. I think 
whatever negotiations you try to have have to build on what has gone before. 
There is a history there, there�s a lot of work that has been done, there is 
progress that has been made before. So we would hope that progress would be used 
by both sides and that people would build on that and that�s what the Co-chairs 
said. If they don�t do that, I think it will be very hard to move forward. I 
think everybody is interested in moving forward. We want to take what has been 
done before and try to build on that.  
 
Question: I�m Ravindran from Oliden Radio. 
The donor�s conference asked 
for drastic political changes from the government of Sri Lanka. Can you please 
elaborate on that?  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: Sorry, who asked?  
 
Question: The donor�s conference.  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: You mean the Tokyo meeting?  
 
Question: Yes.  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: I don�t know if I can elaborate much more 
than what was in the statement. When you look at the situation now and the forms 
of government and the way things are structured now, and what it would take to 
involve the Tamil community politically in a new arrangement -- that does 
require a great deal of change. A radical change in terms of movement. Now 
that�s a change that can be considered. A vision needs to be put out and needs 
to be elaborated by the parties themselves and then negotiated by the parties 
themselves. But whatever you call it, it is quite a different governing 
structure than what you have now and one that�s designed to give an enhanced 
political role to all the people of Sri Lanka but particularly to take into 
account the desire of Tamils and Muslims to have more control over their own 
destinies and over their own areas.  
 
Question: Mr. Boucher, I am Vijay Dissanayake from the National 
Television. You have said that the United States Government is in active dialog 
with India on the developments in Sri Lanka. What role do you think India should 
play to bring about a lasting solution to the crisis in Sri Lanka?  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: That�s an interesting question. In the end 
it�s going to be a question the Indian government has to answer for itself. What 
we�ve found so far in just talking, we find their insights useful. We find it 
useful to compare notes and understandings with them. I think the Co-chairs have 
been in the habit of regularly talking to India, representatives of the Indian 
government, so they understand what we�re doing and we can understand what 
they�re doing. I think ultimately what part any of us from the outside play, 
whether it�s India, the United States, Norway, or anybody else, depends on the 
parties themselves. We�ll see what role India might think it could take in this 
process, but we will all see, more importantly I think, whether the parties find 
a useful role that they think India should be playing with them.  
 
Question: I�m Raj Balabanaike from the Sunday Times, I mean Sunday 
Observer in Colombo. Mr. Boucher, you said�.  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: You applying to a new organization? 
(laughter)  
 
Question: Mr. Boucher, you talked repeatedly about Tamil Tiger 
provocations and in this light, I was wondering whether by implication, what 
would you say of the Sri Lankan government�s prerogative to meet these 
provocations by way of retaliatory action, etc?  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: I don�t think its matter of prerogatives. 
Every government, every military has a right to defend themselves. The question 
is what is going to move forward towards the government�s goals; towards the 
goals of finding a peaceful solution on this island. I think the policy the 
government has basically followed of restraint has been a good one in that 
regard. (inaudible) they have followed a policy of restraint. We also, in our 
Co-chairs statement, said we thought there were things the government can and 
should be doing, both in terms of presenting a vision to show a way forward, and 
also then working to ensure that the human rights violations are investigated 
and stopped and the human rights of all the citizens were respected. One can 
look at this from a theoretical point of view and say to so-and-so, I have a 
right to do this and to do that, but I think so far the government has taken a 
practical approach in terms of trying to move forward and has exercised 
restraint. We think there are other things that they can do indeed that would 
help move forward as well.
 
 
Question: Mr. Boucher, I�m Keith Noyher from the Nation. It�s� I think it 
will be three years since the Co-chairs met in the donor conference in Tokyo. 
Nothing much has happened since then. The LTTE has skipped that meeting. Now 
this sort of created a sense of frustration among the Co-chairs meeting time and 
again but nothing has happened, and the peace process hasn�t moved an inch 
forward. How do you react to that?  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: Well, I think that there are two things that 
the Co-chairs tried to do. One, is to make sure that the assistance to Sri Lanka 
was well spent. I think you saw in our Co-chairs statement that, indeed, $3.4 
billion dollars has been spent and that we thought that money had gone to good 
purposes here in Sri Lanka. It�s helped a lot with building infrastructure, 
creating schools, creating parks, a variety of developments needs. In fact, more 
than 20% of that money has gone into the North and East. So we know� We think 
it�s contributing to the needs of all the people in Sri Lanka, including the 
Tamil community in the North and East. So that was one: make sure the money is 
well spent. We�ve probably done a better job on that than on number two, which 
is to support and shepherd and assist with the peace process. It�s hard to 
assist with a peace process if there is not a lot of negotiation and peace 
process going on. We also have to look at the situation and say what can we try 
to do next to move things forward.  
 
We have supported the Norwegian role as facilitator. We very much supported the 
role of the Co-chairs to try to help with assistance, but also on the peace 
process. I think we are looking at other efforts that we can take with other 
governments, either to push the parties or to help the parties move forward. The 
fact that we haven�t gotten far in the last couple of years is not a sign that 
we should abandon our efforts. We think it�s an important enough task for all of 
us that we need to keep to trying and we need to keep trying for ways forward 
and that�s what we will keep doing.  
 
Question: Shimali Sennanayake for the New York Times. Your Co-Chair 
statements spoke about deep isolation for the LTTE if it does not renounce 
violence. If the LTTE escalates its attacks further, is it only deep isolation 
that the LTTE faces, or will they face something more? Are you looking at 
further supporting the government in a military sense?  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: We are looking at supporting the government 
as a good partner in many areas, and we obviously consider this a democratically 
elected government. We have assistance programs that go here. We have programs 
like the Millennium Challenge Account program that we�re working on with the 
government to provide more assistance for their programs, particularly when it 
comes to rural development and agricultural things. We do have military 
exchanges and programs with the government, including some military sales. Those 
are all legitimate and important aspects of our work with the government. So I 
think that�s already something that�s ongoing. I don�t know how much that might 
change depending on the actions of the LTTE. But, certainly, we�re trying to 
support the people of Sri Lanka through their democratic government. What that 
refers to, as well, though, is that the deepening isolation of the LTTE has been 
caused by their terrorist acts. You have, now, other governments listing them, 
trying to cut off the financial flows. We are talking to other governments about 
their sources of finance and their sources of arms, and how we can squeeze that 
more and try to keep that from flowing in to fuel the conflict. I think, 
inevitably, if they continue on the path of terrorism instead of the path of 
negotiation, they will find more and more people turned against them and more 
and more people who are actively looking to cut off their sources of support.
 
 
Question: [You just mentioned arms. What kind measures and strategies can 
you take since much of the weaponry is coming in from Southeast Asia?]  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: Well, I think, first of all we need to raise 
the profile of this. This is a danger: that this funneling of arms into areas 
controlled by the Tamil Tigers and their acquisition of weapons is a danger to 
this island and a danger to the people here, and that other governments need to 
do what they can to stop it. So I think we�ll be talking to governments 
multilaterally and then talking to individual governments as we discover and 
find out where these flows are coming from and how they�re occurring. 
Governments, I�m sure, don�t want this to occur on their territory. But it�s a 
matter of finding out more closely how it�s happening and where it�s coming from 
and how the shipments go, and then looking for ways that the government can 
intervene to stop.  
 
Question: Sorry, I wonder if I might follow up? It�s on a slightly 
different issue, actually. It�s on this issue of truce monitors suspecting that 
some elements of the military are colluding with a breakaway group � this Karuna 
group that�s killing the Tigers.  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: Yeah.  
 
Question: Do you feel the government is doing enough to curb that?  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: The government took a commitment in Geneva 
to cut off the activities of groups that were operating independently. I think 
we all feel that that commitment has not been fulfilled at this point, that 
there is, indeed, more action that the government could take in that regard. We 
talk about the standards that we expect of the government because they are a 
democratically elected government. They need to, first of all, prevent human 
rights abuses, and to prevent the operations of paramilitaries or other armed 
groups on their territory. But second of all, to establish what you might call 
"positive control" over all the people that work for them, all the people that 
are associated with them, all the people in government territories to make sure 
that nobody is supporting that sort of activity by armed groups. I think that�s 
where we do look for them to do more to carry out the pledge they made in 
Geneva.  
 
Question: Amal Jayasinghe, Agence France-Presse. You mentioned the 
gifting of a Coast Guard cutter as a sign of tangible support to the government 
in its fight against the Tigers. So, does it stop at that or is there any more 
cooperation and active support or any more tangible things [that might be 
gifted]?  
 
Assistant Secretary Boucher: That gets back to the question before. We 
are working with the government in any number of areas. We�re working with the 
government diplomatically on some aspects of the problem; we�re working with the 
government directly on economic development questions. I cited the Millennium 
Challenge Corporation funding as one of the aspects. We�re working with the 
government on military aspects, including training and exchanges as well as some 
matters of equipment. So I think we want to continue to work with the government 
in all these areas. We want to make sure we have a positive relationship with 
Sri Lanka, with the people of Sri Lanka, and the government of Sri Lanka in the 
political area, in the economic area, and in the security area in a variety of 
ways. So we�ll continue to be involved in very tangible ways with the government 
and with the people of Sri Lanka, from all the communities, for that matter. 
Thank you. 
 
   |