The statement issued by the Royal Norwegian Government at 
				the conclusion of the third session of peace talks between the 
				Government and the LTTE in Oslo - 
				VIDAR HELGESEN:
				
				The third session of peace talks between the Government of Sri 
				Lanka (GOSL) and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) was 
				held in Oslo, Norway 2nd to 5th December 2002. In a frank, open 
				and constructive manner, the parties focused on three major 
				areas: 
				First, Consolidation of the Ceasefire Agreement
				Secondly, humanitarian and rehabilitation action and
				Thirdly, Political matters.
				
				On the political matters, the parties agreed on a working 
				outline defining the objective as well as a number of 
				substantive political issues for negotiation. Responding to a 
				proposal by the leadership of the LTTE, the parties have agreed 
				to explore a political solution founded on the principle of 
				internal self-determination in areas of historical habitation of 
				the Tamil-speaking peoples, based on a federal structure within 
				a united Sri Lanka. The parties acknowledged that the solution 
				has to be acceptable to all communities. 
				
				Guided by this objective, the parties agreed to initiate 
				discussions on substantive political issues such as, but not 
				limited to:
				
				- Power-sharing between the centre and the region, as well as 
				within the centre, 
				- Geographical region, 
				- Human Rights protection, 
				- Political and administrative mechanism, 
				- Public finance and 
				- Law and order 
				
				The parties recognised that progress on political issues must be 
				supported by the continued consolidation of the Ceasefire 
				Agreement. New concrete measures will be taken to facilitate 
				further de-escalation and to improve normalcy:
				
				- The GOSL will shortly return one of the hotels in Jaffna to 
				its original use 
				- The LTTE will ensure that all future transportation of area 
				commanders will take place under the supervision of the Sri 
				Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM) 
				- The LTTE will accept the right of political groups to carry 
				out political work, including in the Jaffna peninsula and the 
				islands, provided that they are unarmed, as stipulated by the 
				Ceasefire Agreement 
				- The GOSL will, in consultation with all relevant parties and 
				groups, evolve a solution to the problems arising from recent 
				developments in the Delft Island 
				- The parties will facilitate restoration and rehabilitation of 
				places of worship in the north and the east belonging to all 
				religious communities. 
				
				On the basis of their firm conviction that the maintenance of 
				law and order in the North and East is of paramount importance, 
				the parties agreed to request the Sub-Committee on De-escalation 
				and Normalization to propose a common approach to settling cases 
				involving the disputed use of private property, where such use 
				has been impeded by the conflict.
				
				Furthermore, the LTTE will ensure that the activities of their 
				law and order mechanisms will not be extended beyond the areas 
				dominated by the LTTE. 
				The parties strongly underlined the need to move rapidly on 
				humanitarian and rehabilitation efforts in the North and East. 
				For this purpose, the early establishment of the North-East 
				Reconstruction Fund will be critical. The parties agreed that 
				the custodian of the fund should be selected and modalities for 
				its operation agreed at the next meeting of the Sub-Committee on 
				Immediate Humanitarian and Rehabilitation Needs. The parties 
				expressed their appreciation of the strong support extended to 
				the peace process by several governments at the Sri Lanka 
				Support Meeting held in Oslo on 25 November, and urged these 
				governments to rapidly release funds needed for humanitarian and 
				rehabilitation efforts. 
				
				The parties agreed that a committee of women will be instituted 
				to explore the affects and conclusions of gender issues in the 
				peace process. This committee will also on a regular basis, 
				submit proposals relating to women’s interests to the sessions 
				of negotiations and to the sub-committees of the peace process. 
				The committee will consist of four representatives of each 
				party. 
				
				As a priority area identified by the parties for humanitarian 
				action, the parties stressed the need to improve the situation 
				for children affected by armed conflict. Inspired by the 
				international norms protecting the rights of the child, the 
				parties underlined that children belong with their families or 
				other custodians and not in the workplace, whether civilian or 
				military. The LTTE will engage in a partnership with the United 
				Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to draw up an action plan for 
				restoring normalcy to the lives of children, and the parties 
				called on the international community to provide financial 
				support for such an action plan. 
				
				The GOSL will, in order to arrive at the broadest possible 
				consensus, establish an appropriate mechanism for consultation 
				with all segments of opinion as part of the ongoing peace 
				process. 
				
				And finally, the parties agreed to accept the kind invitation of 
				the Royal Thai Government to host the two next sessions of talks 
				at the Rose Garden in Thailand in January and February 2003.
				
				Thank You.
				
				ERIK SOLHIEM
				
				Thank you Vidar. I now give the floor to Dr. Anton Balasingham 
				chief negotiator of the LTTE to make some initial remarks on 
				behalf of the LTTE and this important document.
				
				
				ANTON BALASINGHAM
				
				My dear friends, you would have observed in the statement read 
				by Mr. Helgesen that both the parties have made an unprecedented 
				historic decision to work out a political formula for the 
				solution of the protracted ethnic conflict. The decision as far 
				as the LTTE is concerned is in line with the policy that we have 
				been advocating for the last two decades or more. That is, a 
				regional autonomous model based on the right to internal 
				self-determination of our people in the historical areas where 
				the Tamil and the Muslim people live. So, with this autonomous 
				model or model of self-government that we were referring to, has 
				to be couched or properly conceptualised within an appropriate 
				concrete constitutional form. That is what we decided, that we 
				will opt for a federal model. This federal model will be within 
				united Sri Lanka which will be appreciated by the Sinhalese 
				people I suppose. 
				
				And I wish to reiterate that our struggle was based on the 
				concept of self-determination as articulated in the UN Charter 
				and other resolutions and instruments of the United Nations. I 
				am surprised because … what has happened is… I had a meeting in 
				London where I clearly exemplified the concept of internal 
				self-determination and also the external self-determination and 
				argued that our leadership is prepared to workout a formula 
				within the principle – internal self-determination. This speech 
				has been totally distorted by the Sunday Island. I am surprised 
				that they claim that Balasingham has said that the LTTE favours 
				two independent states… or something like that. I haven’t read 
				the report fully but I can assure you that it is a total 
				distortion of what I have announced at the London Martyrs’ Day 
				Conference. I have to read out for your clarification what Mr. 
				Prabhakaran said in his Martyrs’ Day message. 
				
				He has said, “We are prepared to consider favourably a political 
				framework that offers substantial regional autonomy and 
				self-government in our homeland on the basis of our right to 
				internal self-determination”. It is on this basis… it is on the 
				basis of the proposals made by the LTTE leadership both the 
				parties have formulated a framework that a federal structure 
				would be the suitable model to realise the principle of internal 
				self-determination. So I think this is, as Prof. Peiris always 
				have said (sic), a paradigm shift. Its not only a paradigm shift 
				on our part, it is also a paradigm shift on the part of the Sri 
				Lankan Government to accommodate the Tamil and the Muslim people 
				within a federal framework in a united country. 
				
				So, I don’t want to give you a lecture here but I wanted to make 
				these three comments before letting you raise questions. 
				
				I will now leave it to Prof. Peiris to make his comments.
				
				G L PEIRIS
				
				Well, I think Dr. Balasingham is exactly correct when he speaks 
				of paradigm shift because that is neither more nor less than has 
				occurred in Oslo during these last three days of intensive 
				discussions. It is necessary to understand the sequence, how 
				this has progressed and reached its present very positive 
				position. There was the explicit statement by Mr. Velupillai 
				Prabhakaran on the 27th of November in his Heroes’ Day speech in 
				which he said that the LTTE is no longer insisting on a separate 
				state but the LTTE is looking at a different concept in earnest 
				and that is internal self-determination. And he went on to 
				explain what he meant. This was power sharing, extensive power 
				sharing within the framework of one country. No question of 
				cessation, no question of separation but power sharing within 
				the framework of one country. It is fair to say that this 
				statement was foreshadowed in many respects by comments which 
				were made at the conclusion of the Sattahip session in Thailand 
				from the 16th to the 18th of September and also in the second 
				session in Nakhon Pathom Thailand by Dr. Anton Balasingham. He 
				foreshadowed much of what was said in his speech and it received 
				the final authoritative articulation by the leader of the LTTE 
				on the 27th of November.
				
				So that was the point of departure. They are now talking about 
				power sharing within one country. Now immediately that provided 
				us with a coherent framework within which to evolve a negotiated 
				political solution because the position of the Government of Sri 
				Lanka is also that it stands for substantial power sharing 
				within one country. 
				
				Now the break through yesterday the importance of which cannot 
				be over-estimated, Erik Solhiem’s so called “something 
				unprecedented and historic”, indeed it was. And the development 
				was this - the explicit identification of a federal structure as 
				the basis on which this political solution is going to be 
				evolved. So we now have a very clear indication of the nature of 
				the political solution that the parties are working towards in 
				order to bring peace back to our troubled country, to put the 
				war behind us and to put Sri Lanka the on path to peace and 
				prosperity. So, we are talking of a federal solution. It is not 
				separatism, it is not confederation… it is a federal model. Now, 
				if we believe in a political solution, if we are renouncing war… 
				if we believe in a political solution… there could not be any 
				other rural tribal except power sharing – except the basis, the 
				character of a federal solution. Now this means that we will be 
				able to make substantial progress in the next two rounds of 
				discussions in Thailand. We have identified on this occasion 
				some of the specific matters which will need to be focused upon 
				such as the power sharing between the centre and the region and 
				also power sharing within the centre. Matters relating to law 
				and order, matters relating to territory… we have enumerated the 
				specific matters which will receive attention I the next two 
				sessions all within the framework of the federal structure that 
				we have referred to. So that is one part of it. 
				
				Then very briefly the other achievement was the solid 
				consolidation of the Ceasefire Agreement. Because that is the 
				source from which all these benefits flow. The parties discussed 
				the problems which have arisen with regard to the Ceasefire 
				Agreement. We identified the potential source of these tensions 
				and we figured out ways and means of addressing these problems 
				in order to prevent these tensions from escalating. 
				
				Then, we also talked about the money part of it – the need to 
				engage in development oriented and humanitarian activity (that 
				is going to be finalised in the next session). Then a women’s 
				committee that is to focus on problems which are particularly 
				acute in the case of women and children in the war affected 
				areas. And also a decision on the part of the…. of both parties 
				to work towards the restoration of the religious heritage of all 
				religions in those parts of the country.
				
				So all in all it was a very substantial achievement which 
				straddled all the different areas that we are talking about. 
				Three major areas – one is the political matter, the second is 
				the Ceasefire consolidation and the third is the humanitarian 
				and rehabilitation matters. So it was indeed a very satisfying 
				occasion.
				
				Thank You.