| When do we see soldiers in action? During war of
          course. Even a child knows that. But in Sri Lanka there
          are grown-up people seeing child soldiers everywhere
          although there has been no war for more than three years.
          Is it an optical illusion or some kind of mental
          disorder? How does one differentiate a child from a child
          soldier ? How does one differentiate a child from an
          adult? It all depends either on the fair-mindedness or
          the inbuilt prejudices of the onlooker.
 UNICEF's agenda
 
 UNICEF, an organisation that has been long playing
          anti-LTTE politics in Sri Lanka had according to a report
          counted 3516 cases of child soldiers since the war
          stopped in February 2002. One does not know how they did
          the counting. Obviously by using a telescope and a
          calculator. A drunken man soaked in liquor can sometimes
          see a pink elephant. But other mortals, however hard they
          try can never see a pink elephant. To the UNICEF man in
          Colombo, to Kadirgamar, to the columnists of the Island
          newspaper, neither of whom had ever set eyes on the
          suffering orphan Tamil children in the Vanni taken care
          by the LTTE and TRO, every child there must look like a
          child soldier. Have they ever shown one ounce of concern
          for the little children who lost their father or their
          mother or lost both by indiscriminate bombing from the
          air or shelling from land?
 
 There was a fat, glossy magazine called " marie claire"
          (April 2005) meant for idle affluent women mad about
          clothes and fashions that had an article written by a
          woman named Jane White. She went to the Vanni and she
          says she saw child soldiers. Who were those child
          soldiers?
 
 Karate lessons
 
 One picture showed young girls taking karate lessons "at
          a Tamil Tigers orphanage" Many white children in this
          country go for karate lessons. That does not make them
          child soldiers. There was another picture of a little
          child, around three or four years old wearing the uniform
          of a Tamil Tiger. Some proud parent had obviously felt
          happy in seeing him in such a dress. In Britain, any
          child of three and four can buy in a toy shop the uniform
          of a policeman, helmet, walkie-talkie etc. That doesn't
          make him a policeman.
 Another picture shows small children with the caption
          that says "An armed soldier stands guard over children at
          a temporary relief camp". Only the soldier's legs and
          boots are shown , but no mention of the fact that he is a
          Sri Lankan soldier. The writer asks a little child in his
          innocence to pose for a picture covering his face with
          fresh flowers, and the caption says "fresh flowers are
          used to protect the identity of former child soldiers"
          Wasn't that a piece of diabolical journalism? So what was
          the motive of that stupid woman carrying such pictures to
          prove the existence of child soldiers? There was only one
          motive: to demonise the Tamil Tigers in the eyes of the
          world.
 Loaded headline
 
 The very headline of the article is loaded for a purpose.
          It says "From tsunami orphans to SUICIDE BOMBERS" . Even
          photos of innocent-looking, suffering children are given
          mischievous captions. It is obvious that the woman called
          Jane White (if that is her real name) was sent there by
          the UNICEF man in Colombo to look after his own agenda.
          It is a pity that when she was herself a small child Jane
          White's parents never taught her - Tell No Lies.
 
 There is no point in writing to the magazine protesting
          the publication of such mischievous rubbish because the
          editor of the magazine will never publish it. Her duty is
          to stand by her contributor, not, repeat NOT, TO STAND BY
          THE TRUTH. We had a look at the magazine's so-called
          Letters Page. There were just five letters from readers,
          none of which was of any consequence.
 
 There is no point in the LTTE trying to offer
          explanations to such people whose sole agenda is to pull
          out this allegation of child soldiers like a magician
          pulling out rabbit from inside a top hat. These are
          people who cannot bear the sight of the LTTE earning
          recognition and prestige in the eyes of the international
          community.
 
 Denials won't help
 
 Denials and explanations are not going to change the
          mind-set of these detractors. The only way to shut them
          up is to get about five hundred children of the ages of
          three and four, dress them up in the uniforms of Tamil
          Tigers, and parade them in web sites and newspapers with
          the bold caption - LTTE's child soldiers. Send copies of
          those photographs to the UNICEF office in Colombo and to
          the Island newspaper requesting publication. If the
          Island does not publish it, the editor will at least get
          the message. If he publishes it, he will look foolish in
          the eyes of the world.
 |