| 
          Caste & the Tamil Nation
           On Dalit Phobia 
          Chandra Babu Prasad 
          6 June 2006 
           
          Book Note by the Publishers -
          Vitasta Publishing Pvt Ltd: 
          Chandra Bhan Prasad is one of the leading
          Dalit intellectuals in the country. He has been writing
          regularly for various newspapers and magazines on
          Dalit-related issues. He believes in confounding readers
          with new ideas and challenging them to think afresh away
          from the traditional paradigm. 
           
          One may not agree with him, but one will find it
          difficult to brush aside his arguments. While India is
          marching ahead through the shopping malls and Express
          National Highways, the average Dalit has not moved
          forward. He is subjected to same tyranny or humiliation,
          which his forefathers faced, if he dares to walk the road
          not trodden by his predecessors. 
           
          1958-born Chandra Bhan comes from Azamgarh district of
          Uttar Pradesh. The urge to rebel and fight for justice
          took him to the CPI-ML in 1983. He was a research scholar
          at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi,
          where he specialised in Chinese Science and Technology.
          He began the Dalit Shikhsa Andolan (Dalit Education
          Movement), which has since spread to many districts of
          Uttar Pradesh. 
           
          Excerpt from Dalit Phobia: 
          Sapru related to Mahatma Gandhi the whole
          story. Malaviya put the Hindu point of view. Then in a
          soft, slow flow Dr Ambedkar began. He said in low voice:
          "Mahatmaji, you have been very unfair to us. It is always
          my lot to appear to be unfair." Replied Mahatma Gandhi:
          "I cannot help it." Then Dr Ambedkar explained the whole
          situation and his viewpoints. The sober Biblical language
          had its visible effect upon Mahatma Gandhi. He was
          convinced of the justice of Dr Ambedkar's demands. At
          length, Mahatma Gandhi replied: "You have my fullest
          sympathy. I am with you, Doctor, in most of the things
          you say. But you say you are interested in my life." "Yes
          Mahatmaji, in the hope that if you would devote solely to
          the cause of my people, you would become our hero, too,"
          said Dr Ambedkar in reply. (pp130-131) 
           
          Dalits have faced social ostracism of a peculiar kind.
          Centuries-old prejudices pushed them to the southernmost
          corner of traditional Indian villages almost invariably.
          How was this possible, all over the country, unless there
          was a design or a conspiracy? Dalits constitute the same
          proportion of the total population throughout the
          country. Chandra Bhan enumerates the history behind this
          unique phenomenon and argues that this is not possible
          unless there was a colossal shifting of humankind. He
          draws profusely from Dr B. R. Ambedkar. Hindutva forces
          may not take kindly to him for saying that Dalits were
          outside the Varna hierarchy and that they worshipped
          different gods and goddesses than the Varna followers. He
          talks of history's longest fought war between the Dalits
          and the non-Dalits in the process of adjustment. Is the
          Varna peoples' hate for Dalits a manifestation of hatred
          of the victor for the defeated and the fear that the
          Dasas of the Vedic times may assert themselves and
          challenge the old Order? 
           
          Chandra Bhan calls this Dalit Phobia and argues that this
          gets passed on genetically through generations.
          Otherwise, how does one explain that the chief executive
          of an MNC, the editor of a newspaper and the fishermen at
          Nagapattinam (Tamil Nadu) share the same disdain when it
          comes to dealing with Dalits. It must be pathological and
          hence the treatment must also be so. He suggests Dalit
          therapy and demands international action to cure the
          disease while describing this as more vicious and
          pervading than Apartheid. Is it after the Poona Pact with
          Dr Ambedkar that Mahatma Gandhi realised the need to work
          among the Harijans (Dalits)? The author argues it is
          indeed so and points out to the bold arguments Dr
          Ambedkar had with the Mahatma. The book also reflects why
          an average Dalit holds Dr Ambedkar in such a high esteem.
          He could stand up and resist the Varna Order. It must
          have needed a massive courage to face the Mahatma and
          tell him about the centuries of injustices meted out to
          Dalits. Those who blame Macaulay for ills of `India's
          education system are in for a shock as the book finds him
          as a liberator of Dalits. Chandra Bhan is an ardent
          Macaulay fan. Macaulay liberated India from the
          Brahmin-oriented traditional education system and Varna
          jurisprudence, he argues. He also holds Macaulay Party
          every year to celebrate the man and his ideas. 
           
          While trying to analyse how Dalits gained importance and
          social recognition, the book concludes the 1942 Quit
          India Movement to be a Vedic reaction to the British who
          had dared to induct Dr Ambedkar in the Viceroy's Council
          and thus the Council's ruling elite. 
          A must-read for anyone trying to analyse
          Dalit psychology and the hate sense of the Varna Order
          for these deprived groups. People often confuse Dalits
          with the Backward Castes. The book describes the Backward
          Castes as a part of the Varna Order unlike Dalits who are
          still treated as untouchables. This may help understand
          why the same yardstick of reservation was not applied for
          two different social categories by the Constitution
          makers.
  
         |