CONTENTS
OF THIS SECTION
17/06/09 |
"I attended a press
conference where SriLanka Defence Minister Ranjan
Wijeratne told the press that there had been no civilian
casualties despite heavy bombing. When I volunteered that I had
seen many bomb-blasted bodies, and many hundreds of people
injured by helicopter strafing and more, the Defence Minister
told me it was a pity I had not been shot."
Deanna Hodgin, Insight Magazine, to Congressman Gus
Yatron,Subcommittee on Human Rights,Washington
7 November 1990 |
"You cannot do things under normal law. It takes a
lot of time. By the time my good friends who are lawyers take time
to solve these things, the match will be over. We have finished the
first eleven and the second eleven. Now we are tackling the under
fourteen fellows.",
Sri
Lanka's Deputy Defence Minister, Ranjan Wijeratne
(Sri Lanka Hansard, Volume 62, Column 1249, proceedings of 25 January
1990) |
"...The time has come for
the whole Sinhala race which has existed for 2500 years,
jealously safeguarding their language and religion, to fight
without giving any quarter to save their birthright... I
will lead the campaign..."
J.R.Jayawardene, Sinhala Opposition Leader in Sri
Lanka Tribune, 30 August 1957 |
"If there is
discrimination in this land which is not their (Tamil) homeland,
then why try to stay here.Why not go back home (India) where
there would be no discrimination.
There are your kovils and Gods.There you have your culture,
education, universities etc. There you are masters of your own
fate....
If the sleeping Sinhalese wake up to see the
Tamils trying to establish a Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka, then
things may not be quite calm. It would be advisable for the
Tamils not to disturb the sleeping Sinhala brother. Everybody
knows that lions when disturbed are not peaceful." -
Mr.W.J.M. Lokubandara, M.P. in Sri Lanka's Parliament, July 1981
|
"Since yesterday morning,
we have heard in this honourable House about the various types
of punishment that should be meted out to them (Tamil
Parliamentary leaders).
The MP for Panadura (Dr Neville Fernando) said there was a
punishment during the time of the Sinhalese kings, namely, two
arecanut posts are erected, the two posts are then drawn toward
each other with a rope, then tie each of the feet of the
offender to each post and then cut the rope which result in the
tearing apart the body. These people also should be punished in
the same way..
...some members suggested that they should
be put to death on the stake; some other members said that their
passports shouldbe confiscated; still other members said that
they should be stood at the Galle Face Green and shot. The
people of this country want and the government is prepared to
inflict these punishments on these people."
- Mr. G.V.Punchinilame, Sinhala M.P. for Ratnapura in Sri Lanka's
Parliament, July 1981.
|
"Now, Sir... what should we
do to this so called leader of the Tamils?
If I were given the power, I would tie him to the nearest concrete
post in this building and horsewhip him till I raise him to his
wits. Thereafter let anybody do anything he likes - throw
him into the Beire (lake) or into the sea, because he will be so
mutilated that I do not think there will be life in him. That is
war." -
Mr.D.M. Chandrapala, Sinhala M.P. for Kundasale in Sri Lanka's
Parliament, July 1981 |
" We are born as
Sinhalese and as Buddhists in this country.
Though we are in a majority, we have been surrendering to the
minority community for four years. Let us rule as a majority
community". - Mrs. Wimala Kannangara M.P., Minister for Rural
Development, in Sri Lanka's Parliament, July 1981 |
"I have tried to be effective for sometime but cannot. I am
not worried about the opinion of the Jaffna (Tamil) people now... The more
you put pressure in the north, the happier the Sinhala people will be here..
really, if I starve the Tamils out, the Sinhala people will be happy.."" July
1983,
President Jayawardene, in the London Daily
Telegraph: |
|
INDICTMENT
AGAINST SRI LANKA
Impunity: Crime & No Punishment
Impunity means freedom from punishment.
During the past five decades and more the Sri Lankan security forces,
para military groups and
Sinhala goondas have violated the rights of the Tamil people, have
killed,
tortured,
raped and
massacred with impunity, free from any fear of punishment. The
pattern of behaviour established by the Sinhala Sri Lanka
government's refusal to adequately investigate the crimes committed
against the Tamil people and the overt statements made by Sinhala
politicians from time to time expose the true nature of the assimilative
agenda of
Sinhala Buddhist governments.
|
Public Statement
by International Independent Group of Eminent Persons, 30 April 2008
|
"..It is lamentable that the
Government of Sri Lanka continues to divert attention from the
central truth in this matter – that is,
the problem of impunity for serious human rights violations and
the need for the Commission to get to the bottom of that
impunity..."
The IIGEP consists of the
following 11 Eminent Persons: Justice P.N. Bhagwati (India)
(Chairman), Judge Jean-Pierre Cot (France), Mr. Marzuki Darusman
(Indonesia), Mr. Arthur E. “Gene” Dewey (USA), Prof. Cees Fasseur
(Netherlands), Dr. Kamal Hossain (Bangladesh), Prof. Bruce Matthews
(Canada), Mr. Andreas Mavrommatis (Cyprus), Prof. Sir Nigel Rodley
(UK), Prof. Ivan Shearer (Australia) and Prof. Yozo Yokota (Japan).
|
Impunity
Making Mockery of Addressing Extrajudicial Executions -
Special Rapporteur to UN's Third Committee, 29 October 2007 |
Mass
Acquittal in Bindunuwewa Massacre Case, June 2005 |
"At no time there were any incidents among the detainees
and the management. There were no incidents with the neighbours either…. It
is clear from the information now received by the authorities that
provocation from external forces had led to this situation," - thus
spoke President Chandrika Kumaratunga immediately following the Bindunuwewa
massacre. The acquittal of the accused in the Bindunuwewa massacre was
foretold...The ethnic biases have plagued the administration of justice in
Sri Lanka. It has been almost impossible for the ethnic minority Tamils
to obtain justice.
The impunity accorded by the Sri Lankan government to the
perpetrators of racial violence has increased the alienation of the ethnic
minority Tamils. The judgement of 27 May 2005 which established the fact
that not a single person could be held guilty for the mass murder of 28
Tamils in the protective custody of the State at Bindunuwewa will further
increase the distrust of even the moderate Tamil minorities with the
democratic institutions of Sri Lanka..."
|
Amnesty International Calls on the Sri Lankan Government to Prosecute Security
Forces Responsible for Disappearances in Sri Lanka, 2004 |
In Sri Lanka, the security forces have been responsible for
tens of thousands of "disappearances" ... "Disappearance" appeared to be
used for two purposes: it facilitated
torture
without accountability and it concealed the killing of
prisoners. In the overwhelming majority of these cases, there have been
virtually no reported prosecutions or convictions.
Impunity for these
crimes continues. .."
|
Sinhala
dominated Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission closes file on rape of Sarathambaal,
June 2001 |
"..Since the government of President Chandrika is
indifferent to crimes committed by members of the armed forces in a
pervasive climate of immunity from punishment, such state sponsored
terrorism is on the rise. The long arm of the law simply refuses to catch
the rapists and murders, except in very rare cases, when the victims are
Tamils!.."
|
Appeal submitted by the Tamil Centre for Human Rights to UN Commission on Human
Rights, March 2000 |
"..Impunity remains a serious concern, and has been
consistently noted in reports on human rights fact finding missions to Sri
Lanka over many years. .. Impunity reigns, cutting deeper and deeper wounds
into the Tamil people in the Island of Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan security
forces continue to arrest, torture, rape, murder and dispose of bodies with
impunity..."
|
Written
statement by the Asian Legal Resource Centre at UN Commission on Human
Rights, February 2000 |
"The major obstacle to the prosecution of the
perpetrators is that
there had been no
criminal investigations into the disappearances when they occurred. The
criminal investigations were prevented by special emergency regulation laws,
the passage of which created the background for large-scale disappearances.
The provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code relating to criminal
investigations were suspended through special laws. The bodies were allowed
to be disposed of without any report being filed before the courts or
without any inquest. As most of the bodies were burnt there is no
possibility of examining them during belated inquiries. Further, as the
alleged perpetrators are the law enforcement officers themselves, there is
no possibility of conducting a credible inquiry into disappearances by the
normal process of criminal investigations through the agencies of the
police. The demand for the appointment of a special agency for investigating
disappearances has not been heeded."
|
No action
taken against soldiers committing human rights violations...reports British
Refugee Council, January 2000 |
"..Batticaloa people are concerned that no action is
being taken against soldiers committing human rights violations.
Local
(Tamil) MP Joseph Pararajasingham says that security forces fired
indiscriminately while celebrating the New Year and killed R Suriyaprakash, 18,
of Iruthayapuram. On 17 January, the Kalmunai court ordered the police to
appoint a senior officer and submit a special progress report in the case of
student S Sanjayan who allegedly died of torture in custody. The order was made
after lawyers complained that the police had not made any progress in the
investigation for the last three months..."
|
Asian
Human Rights Commission Statement, September 1999 |
....The Sri Lankan Foreign Minister,
Lakshman Kadirgamar in his speech to the United Nations failed to touch on
the main issue of the debate, which is the gross abuse of human rights by
the State.
Does sovereignty give the right to a State to engage in gross abuse of human
rights? Can those States, which have failed to redress gross abuse of
human rights, say "we are sovereign, we do not need to redress to gross
abuse of human rights." Can a
state protect
those who have committed crimes against humanity? Former Chilean dictator
General Augusto Pinochet tried to use the same defence but failed.
Sri Lankan record of gross abuse of human rights is much worse than that
of the Chile during the rule of Pinochet....."
|
Sri
Lanka's pervasive climate of impunity a source of concern says Human Rights
Watch, January 1999
|
"..In several prominent human rights
cases before the courts, security personnel accused of gross violations
remained on active duty.. No progress was
made in reopening the
notorious Bolgoda Lake
case
despite government vows in 1997 to expedite it. The case implicated
twenty-two Special Task Force (STF) commandos in the 1995 murders of
twenty-three Tamil youths whose bodies were found floating in bodies of
water near Colombo. The suspects were released on bail in 1996 and resumed
their duties..... Sri Lanka's pervasive climate of impunity was a
source of concern for both the
U.N. Working Group on Disappearances and
Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions Bacre
Waly Ndaiye..."
|
A culture of impunity has developed says
International Commission of Jurists, September 1998 |
"Between 1983 and the present day the security forces in Sri
Lanka (including the armed forces, the police, and local militia units armed
by the Government) have been responsible for thousands of murders and
disappearances, the vast majority of the latter involving deliberate
killings... a great many murders and disappearances have ... occurred in the
course of the struggle against the LTTE. After a welcome decline in 1994 and
1995, there was a significant recurrence in 1996.... The fact is that not
a single member of the security forces had at the date of the Mission, been
convicted of murder. .."
|
Professor Jordan J. Paust
in the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, May 1998 |
"The pattern of behavior
established by the government’s refusal to allow non-governmental and HRTF
investigations, as well as the refusal to adequately investigate denials of
human rights, coupled with evidence of government impunity, constitute
circumstantial evidence of the policy of denial of rights .."
|
Report of the Special
Rapporteur, Mr. Bacre Waly Ndiaye, on Extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary
executions - March 1998 |
"...Effective impunity encourages
political violence and is a serious destabilizing element in all contexts of
the Sri Lankan sociopolitical system. Respect for the rule of law is
essential to maintain order and stability and to protect human rights in any
country. Impunity perpetuates the mass violation of human rights. There have
been periodical extrajudicial executions, but few perpetrators have been
brought to justice. Furthermore, impunity is an obstacle to democratic
development and peace negotiations, and makes reconciliation difficult. This
culture of impunity has led to arbitrary killings and has contributed to the
uncontrollable spiralling of violence. The systematic absence of
investigation, either civil or military, into violations of the right to
life facilitates impunity. Investigations are rarely conducted, and when
they are, they do not lead to the appropriate convictions or penalties. .."
|
Tamil M.P. Joseph Pararajasingham on Impunity & Human Rights Violations in
Batticaloa, Appeal to United States, August 1997 |
"..the
Emergency Regulations and the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) has
given wide arbitrary powers to the security forces which results in the
impunity enjoyed by them by usage of these obnoxious regulations, including
through murder, torture and intimidation of witnesses. Also, the Government
seems unable or unwilling to punish the perpetrators. Directives and
statements by Government leaders, including the President, are not
implemented by the military in the field. Since they are not punished, more
violations are committed.
The military is also encouraged by the regular denials by
the Government of the violations, ignoring results of independent inquiries,
the government censorship and restrictions on outside observers and NGOs,
and by the support that the Government and the military receives from the
international community. Of special significance is the U.S. support in arms
sales and Green Beret training to the Sri Lankan Army. .."
|
De facto impunity for security forces - Bolgoda Trial Collapses, March 1997 |
" When the case against 22 members of the Special Task Force
including senior officers of the Intelligence Unit for involvement in
dumping of bodies in the Bolgoda Lake was taken up in Courts on March 13,
the judge commented that the relevant parties were not present in Court and
that the absence of representatives of the Attorney General's Department in
such a situation was an obstruction to justice. Saying that continuing with
the trial in such a case was a waste of time, he added that he would not
sit again in this case..."
|
Justice has
fled the entire system - Sinhala paper Sunday Leader - December 1996 |
"..The national newspaper pages pathetically record ever
increasing stories of rape, murder, beatings, political killings and
counter-killings, and suicides apparently motivated through fear or mental
inability to contend with the fear of an unrestrained violent reprisal.
..This is the tragic and true state of affairs as far as law and justice
are concerned in Sri Lanka. ... Ultimately, even rape and murder in some
remote place is tainted with either political intervention or protection
that ensures the rapist, the murderer, the killer, the political assassin,
the arsonist, freedom to strut free and terrorise society.
The basic texture of political intervention negates social justice and
the rule of law.."
|
Impunity
remains a serious concern says Amnesty, August 1996 |
"...Impunity for those responsible for human rights
violations remains a serious concern.
Progress in a few court cases against members of the security forces charged
in connection with "disappearances" and extrajudicial executions is slow; as
are investigations into many other cases. Relatives of tens of thousands of
people who were killed or "disappeared" over the last 13 years or so are
still waiting for justice to be done...."
|
Report by an
independent international law group on impunity in Sri Lanka, May 1985 |
"..The international community has repeatedly
urged the Government of Sri Lanka to prevent further violence
and to prosecute security force members committing
extra-judicial killings. In 1983, the Government assured the
United Nations that it intended to protect the fundamental
rights of all Sri Lankan nationals. In February of 1984, Sri
Lanka's Permanent Mission to the United Nations reiterated this
commitment, assuring the United Nations' Commission on Human
-Rights that the rash of Tamil killings during 1983 would be
investigated and that the security forces responsible would be
punished. To date, however,
no security force personnel
have been prosecuted. The only sanction meted out has
been the discharge of some officials guilty of gross human
rights violations. On one occasion, for example, the Government
discharged 149 navy and army personnel implicated in killing 51
innocent civilians in the Jaffna district between July 23 11 and
27, 1983. Even this relatively minor sanction has been rarely
utilized. In the majority of cases, the Government has failed to
discipline responsible security force members at all, despite
assurances to the contrary. The failure to punish security
force personnel implicated in violence and the weak sanctions
meted out in rare instances of punishment seriously compromise
Sri Lanka's international obligations and its domestic law.
...This study recounts repeated incidents for which the
Government has accepted responsibility for violent acts by
security force personnel and for which legal or administrative
remedies have neither been pursued nor provided redress.
"
|
Paul Sieghart: Sri
Lanka: A Mounting Tragedy of Errors - Report of International Commission of
Jurists 1984 |
"...the Government's lack of respect for the rule of law
was evident in three cases in which a mantle of protection was thrown over
officials who had exceeded or abused their powers.
|
Senator S.Nadesan
Q.C., Sri Lanka Senate Hansard, 4 June 1958 |
"Shops were looted... but the police did nothing... Why
did that happen? All that happened because specific instructions had been
given to the police that they should not shoot, should not arrest, should
not deal with the lawlessness and disorder that was let loose... rowdies and
hooligans were given a free hand to assault, humiliate and rob any innocent
Tamil walking the roads on that day. That was the attitude taken up by a
Cabinet composed of Sinhalese Ministers... These (hooligans) were instigated
by some members of Parliament... they were heading the gang of hooligans.
The Prime Minister made a remarkably wonderful speech on that occasion. He
came, he smiled and he told the crowd, "Don't do that. Rain is coming down.
They will be cooled in no time." That was the type of appeal he made. If
Sinhalese men were being thrashed by Tamils and their ears bitten, I wonder
whether the Prime Minister would have adopted the same attitude."
-
|
|