Sathyam Commentary
18 February 2007
On
Nicholas Burns,
Mangala Samaraweera,
US Foreign Policy
& Terrorism
"You have accused me that the Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka
to the United Nations was absent and did not vote when 158 countries
voted with Palestine. This was a special resolution
brought to the
UN by the Palestinian Authority against Israel for its abuses of the
Palestinian people. United States and several other countries were
campaigning against this resolution. As the Foreign Minister, it was
a great challenge for me to decide how we should use our vote.
On the one hand, I am fully aware that we should not abandon the
cause of the Palestinian people who have maintained close ties with
Sri Lanka since Mrs. Bandaranaike's reign. ... On the other hand, Sri Lanka can not
afford to antagonize America, an ally who has helped us in our
struggle against terrorism, not only in words but also in deed.
Having held lengthy discussions with Foreign Ministry officials, we
reached a decision. Sri Lanka is the President of the Israel
Practice Committee (IPC), which investigates abuses committed by
Israel against the Palestinians. I was of the opinion that it would
be more productive for Sri Lanka to protect its integrity and
impartiality in the IPC. Therefore, on the vote held on 17 November
2006, Sri Lanka, as Chairman of the IPC, was not present at the
vote...
.... two days after the vote, US
Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns telephoned me. The decision
taken by us regarding the vote went a long way in building trust and
strengthening US-Sri Lanka ties. Few days afterwards,
at the
Co-Chairs Meeting in Washington DC, Nicholas Burns expressed
America's fullest support to the Government of Sri Lanka in
defeating the menace of LTTE terrorism. After the meeting
he also
held a press conference that was very encouraging to the Government
and the people of Sri Lanka.
It is a victory when we can win the goodwill and trust of both
parties in such a complex international dispute... We should be proud that a
developing country like Sri Lanka, while facing a myriad of
challenges, possesses such a pragmatic and effective foreign policy."
Res ipsa loquitur - the record speaks for itself. We are reminded again of
the words of
Velupillai
Pirabakaran in his 1993 Maha Veera Naal Address -
"...We are fully aware that the world is not rotating on the axis of
human justice. Every country in this world advances its own interests. It is the economic
and trade interests that determine the order of the present world, not the moral law of
justice nor the rights of people.
International relations and
diplomacy between countries are determined by such interests. Therefore we cannot
expect an immediate recognition of the
moral legitimacy of our cause by the international
community..."
And, perhaps, that which we said some months ago in
Black Pebbles & White Pebbles, bears
repetition -
"...Sometimes ..it seems that we avoid... seeking an
open dialogue with the international community on its own strategic
imperatives and the true rationale for its actions. ...We confuse our people by
leading them to believe that all that needs to be done is to wake up the
international community to the facts and the justice of our cause and
all will be well. This is the
limitation of our discourse. It is a limitation that we need to
transcend.......there is a clear need to expose to the scrutiny of the Tamil
people (yes, the Tamil people and not some other people) the
stated claim of the international community
that it seeks the 'best solution in human rights terms' and
explore the unstated interests which the stated claim is
directed to secure. Such an exploration will help us to secure solid
ground under our own feet. In Subhas Chandra Bose's words, it is
only then that we can stand
perpendicular - anywhere..."
|