Sathyam Commentary
18 February 2007
On Nicholas Burns, Mangala Samaraweera,
US Foreign Policy & Terrorism
"You have accused me that the Permanent
Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations
was absent and did not vote when 158 countries
voted with Palestine. This was a special resolution
brought to the UN by the Palestinian Authority
against Israel for its abuses of the Palestinian
people. United States and several other countries
were campaigning against this resolution.
As the Foreign Minister, it was a
great challenge for me to decide how we should use
our vote.
On the one hand, I am fully aware that we should
not abandon the cause of the Palestinian people who
have maintained close ties with Sri Lanka since
Mrs. Bandaranaike's reign. ... On
the other hand, Sri Lanka can not afford to
antagonize America, an ally who has helped us in
our struggle against terrorism, not only in words
but also in deed.
Having held lengthy discussions with Foreign
Ministry officials, we reached a decision. Sri
Lanka is the President of the Israel Practice
Committee (IPC), which investigates abuses
committed by Israel against the Palestinians. I was
of the opinion that it would be more productive for
Sri Lanka to protect its integrity and impartiality
in the IPC. Therefore, on the vote held on 17
November 2006, Sri Lanka, as Chairman of the IPC,
was not present at the vote...
.... two days after the vote, US
Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns telephoned
me. The decision taken by us regarding
the vote went a long way in building trust and
strengthening US-Sri Lanka ties. Few days
afterwards,
at the Co-Chairs Meeting in Washington DC,
Nicholas Burns expressed America's fullest support
to the Government of Sri Lanka in defeating the
menace of LTTE terrorism. After the meeting
he also held a press conference that was very
encouraging to the Government and the people of
Sri Lanka.
It is a victory when we can win the goodwill and
trust of both parties in such a complex
international dispute... We should be proud that a
developing country like Sri Lanka, while facing a
myriad of challenges, possesses such a pragmatic and effective foreign
policy."
Res ipsa loquitur - the record speaks for itself.
We are reminded again of the words of Velupillai
Pirabakaran in his 1993 Maha Veera Naal Address
-
"...We are fully aware that the world is not
rotating on the axis of human justice. Every
country in this world advances its own interests.
It is the economic and trade interests that
determine the order of the present world, not the
moral law of justice nor the
rights of people. International relations and
diplomacy between countries are determined by
such interests. Therefore we cannot expect an
immediate recognition of the
moral legitimacy of our cause by the
international community..."
And, perhaps, that which we said some months ago
in Black Pebbles &
White Pebbles, bears repetition -
"...Sometimes ..it seems that we avoid...
seeking an open dialogue with the international
community on its own strategic
imperatives and the true rationale for its
actions. ...We confuse our people by leading them
to believe that all that needs to be done is to
wake up the international community to the facts
and the justice of our cause and all will be
well. This is the limitation of our discourse. It
is a limitation that we need to
transcend.......there is a clear need to expose
to the scrutiny of the Tamil people (yes, the
Tamil people and not some other people) the
stated claim of the international community that
it seeks the 'best
solution in human rights terms' and explore
the unstated interests which the stated claim is
directed to secure. Such an exploration will help
us to secure solid ground under our own feet. In
Subhas Chandra
Bose's words, it is only then that we can
stand perpendicular - anywhere..."
|