Uganda: First ever arrest warrants
by International Criminal Court
Amnesty Press Release
14 October 2005
Arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal
Court (ICC) for five senior leaders of the Lord's
Republican Army charged with crimes against humanity and
war crimes committed in Uganda since 1 July 2002,
presents an important opportunity to address impunity for
crimes that, over almost two decades, have caused the
unimaginable suffering of thousands of people in northern
Uganda.
The five arrest warrants were issued by Pre-Trial Chamber
II of the ICC on 8 July 2005 under seal, a technique that
has been effective for international courts to improve
the chances that the accused persons can be arrested
before they flee and which was used in this case to
"ensure the safety or physical or psychological
well-being or" and to "prevent the disclosure of the
identity or whereabouts of any victims, potential
witnesses and their families".
Unfortunately, certain persons who were informed of
the existence of the warrant disclosed this information
to the general public, thus increasing the risk that the
accused will flee and dangers to victims and witnesses.
On the evening of 13 October 2005, Pre-Trial Chamber II
decided to unseal the warrants after being assured by the
Prosecutor and the Victims and Witnesses Unit that
"necessary and adequate protective measures for all
concerned at this stage" had been taken.
The accused are Joseph Kony, Vincent Otti, Okot Odhiambo,
Dominic Ongwen and Raska Lukwiya. The charges of crimes
against humanity and war crimes are annexed to this
briefing.
All governments must ensure that those charged are
arrested and surrendered to the ICC immediately.
The government of Uganda, as a state party to the Rome
Statute, must take immediate steps to end the impunity it
has imposed on the country by bringing to justice
thousands of others accused of such crimes, including
Ugandan government forces and their civilian superiors.
The failure of the Prosecutor to seek arrest warrants
against Ugandan government forces and their civilian
superiors is a matter of deep concern because the Ugandan
prosecutors have failed to investigate and prosecute such
crimes during the 19-year conflict.
The importance of ICC arrest warrants
The killing, maiming, abduction, forced recruitment
and sexual slavery of thousands of civilians, including,
in many cases children, has had a devastating impact on
the local population, who over 18 years after the
conflict began, continue to live in daily fear.
Bringing to justice some of the leaders accused of
orchestrating and conducting the crimes before the ICC is
an important step that shows the international community
will not tolerate such crimes.
The decision by the Prosecutor to proceed with issuing
arrest warrants and, in doing so, resisting calls to
suspend the investigation in favour of further political
negotiations sends a clear message that without justice,
there can be no prospect of a lasting peace for the
region.
Trials of those accused will enable victims of the crimes
prosecuted to obtain justice and apply for reparation in
proceedings which observe the highest international
standards of fair trial, which does not impose the death
penalty.
Cooperation is essential to arrest and surrender the
accused to the ICC
Amnesty International has called on all states to
cooperate in arresting and surrendering all persons
charged by the ICC.
Although the persons charged are believed to be in Sudan,
Uganda or the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC),
they could flee anywhere in Africa or elsewhere in the
world. States where accused persons are found, or where
their assets are located, or where important evidence of
the crimes exist have a responsibility to cooperate with
the ICC. In most cases, however, national law requires
that states must enact new legislation expressly
providing for such cooperation. Unfortunately, neither
Sudan, Uganda nor the DRC has enacted the necessary
legislation expressly authorizing arrest and surrender or
defining crimes against humanity and war crimes as crimes
under national law.
Amnesty International has made detailed recommendations
to all states on how to enact effective legislation
implementing the Rome Statute of the International
Criminal Court in The International Criminal Court:
Checklist for Effective Implementing Legislation, AI
Index: IOR 40/011/2000, July 2000, and recommendations
for improvements of draft implementing legislation in
Uganda: IJP commentary on Uganda's draft legislation
implementing the Rome Statute of the ICC, AI Index:
IOR 59/005/2004, 27 July 2004, and in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo: Comments and recommendations on
the July 2003 draft law implementing the Rome Statute of
the International Criminal Court, AI Index: AFR
62/008/2004, 28 May 2004.
Amnesty International today renewed its call to the
governments and parliament of each state to implement the
organization's recommendations immediately for effective
legislation permitting cooperation with the ICC and
trials of any other persons responsible for such crimes
in their own national courts.
The full cooperation from the United Nations (UN), in
particular, in countries where UN missions have been
established, is also essential to work with the ICC and
the states where they are located to arrest and surrender
the charged persons.
Addressing broader impunity for the thousands of
crimes committed in northern Uganda
Although the steps taken by the ICC are to be
supported, it must be noted that ICC trials will only
cover a handful of the thousands of persons responsible
for crimes against humanity and war crimes in northern
Uganda and only members of the LRA, but none of the
members of the government armed forces or their civilian
superiors.
The LRA have committed thousands of crimes including
arbitrary killings, maimings, abductions, forced
recruitment and use of children as soldiers and, in
particular, using them as sex slaves.
Members of government forces have been responsible for
forcing children returning from the LRA, voluntarily or
as a consequence of military action, to join government
armed forces to the fight against the LRA, as well as the
massive forcible displacement of civilians and other
crimes against humanity and war crimes.
Most of these crimes committed are covered by a national
amnesty law adopted by the Ugandan government that
prevents prosecutions in Ugandan courts, although
amnesties for crimes against humanity and war crimes are
prohibited under international law.
The ICC in addition to prosecuting the accused, has a
major role to play in working together with the
government of Uganda and other governments to ensure that
national courts investigate and, where there is
sufficient admissible evidence, prosecute all persons
suspected of such crimes including members of Ugandan
government forces and their civilian superiors. In
particular, Uganda must revoke its unlawful national
amnesty seeking to protect perpetrators of the worst
possible crimes from justice and begin comprehensive
national investigations and prosecutions as soon as
possible.
Background
The new ICC established in The Hague has jurisdiction
over crimes committed after its Statute entered into
force on 1 July 2002. Since then, the ICC has commenced
three investigations into crimes committed in northern
Uganda, the DRC and Darfur, Sudan. Uganda referred the
situation in northern Uganda to the ICC Prosecutor on 29
January 2004 and he announced on 29 July 2004 that he had
opened an investigation.
ANNEX: LIST
OF CHARGES OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND WAR CRIMES
AGAINST THE FIVE ACCUSED
The warrant of arrest for Joseph Kony lists
thirty-three counts on the basis of his individual
criminal responsibility (Articles 25(3)(a) and 25(3)(b)
of the Statute) including:
- Twelve counts of crimes against humanity (murder -
Article 7(1)(a); enslavement - Article 7(1)(c); sexual
enslavement - Article 7(1)(g); rape - Article 7(1)(g);
inhumane acts of inflicting serious bodily injury and
suffering - Article 7(1)(k)), and;
- Twenty-one counts of war crimes (murder - Article
8(2)(c)(i); cruel treatment of civilians - Article
8(2)(c)(i); intentionally directing an attack against a
civilian population - Article 8(2)(e)(i); pillaging -
Article 8(2)(e)(v); inducing rape - Article
8(2)(e)(vi); forced enlisting of children -
8(2)(e)(vii)).
The warrant of arrest for Vincent Otti lists
thirty-two counts on the basis of his individual criminal
responsibility (Article 25(3)(b) of the Statute)
including:
- Eleven counts of crimes against humanity (murder -
Article 7(1)(a); sexual enslavement - Article 7(1)(g);
inhumane acts of inflicting serious bodily injury and
suffering - Article 7(1)(k)), and;
- Twenty-one counts of war crimes (inducing rape -
Article 8(2)(e)(vi); intentionally directing an attack
against a civilian population - Article 8(2)(e)(i);
forced enlisting of children - 8(2)(e)(vii); cruel
treatment of civilians - Article 8(2)(c)(i); pillaging
- Article 8(2)(e)(v); murder - Article
8(2)(c)(i)).
The warrant of arrest for Okot Odhiambo lists ten
counts on the basis of his individual criminal
responsibility (Article 25(3)(b) of the Statute)
including:
- Two counts of crimes against humanity (murder -
Article 7(1)(a); enslavement - Article 7(1)(c)),
and;
- Eight counts of war crimes (murder - Article
8(2)(c)(i ); intentionally directing an attack against
a civilian population - Article 8(2)(e)(i); pillaging -
Article 8(2)(e)(v); forced enlisting of children -
8(2)(e)(vii)).
The warrant of arrest for Dominic Ongwen lists seven
counts on the basis of his individual criminal
responsibility (Article 25(3)(b) of the Statute)
including:
- Three counts of crimes against humanity (murder -
Article 7(1)(a); enslavement - Article 7(1)(c);
inhumane acts of inflicting serious bodily injury and
suffering - Article 7(1)(k)), and;
- Four counts of war crimes (murder - Article
8(2)(c)(i)); cruel treatment of civilians - Article
8(2)(c)(i); intentionally directing an attack against a
civilian population - Article 8(2)(e)(i); pillaging -
Article 8(2)(e)(v)).
The warrant of arrest for Raska Lukwiya lists four
counts on the basis of his individual criminal
responsibility (Article 25(3)(b) of the Statute)
including:
- One count of crimes against humanity (enslavement -
Article 7(1)(c)), and;
- Three counts of war crimes (cruel treatment of
civilians - Article 8(2)(c)(i); intentionally directing
an attack against a civilian population - Article
8(2)(e)(i); pillaging - Article 8(2)(e)(v)).
|